Shinoda Yasutaka, Ohashi Kengo, Matsuoka Tomoko, Arai Kaori, Hotta Nao, Usami Eiseki
Department of Pharmacy, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024 Nov 28;10(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40780-024-00399-x.
Aminoglycosides are crucial for treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections and endocarditis. However, aminoglycosides are associated with significant risks of nephrotoxicity, necessitating careful dose selection and therapeutic drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential for minimizing risk; however, few institutions routinely perform it. This study aimed to assess the impact of a pharmacist-driven therapeutic drug monitoring intervention on aminoglycoside usage trends and clinical outcomes.
This retrospective cohort study included 263 patients treated with aminoglycosides between 2014 and 2023. A pharmacist-led therapeutic drug monitoring intervention began in 2017, focusing on monitoring renal function, documenting patient weight, and closely managing aminoglycoside concentrations. Trends in aminoglycoside use and renal outcomes were analyzed.
Over the study period, appropriate use of aminoglycosides at the time of initial prescription increased from 49 to 82% (P < 0.01). Pharmacist dosing design at initial prescription increased significantly from 21% pre-intervention to 60% post-intervention (P < 0.01). The proportion of pharmacist intervention in initial dosing design increased over time. The proportion of patients with measured aminoglycoside blood concentrations significantly increased from 53% pre-intervention to 72% post-intervention (P < 0.01). The proportion of patients who were able to manage target blood concentrations from the initial aminoglycoside dose without dose adjustments increased from 31% pre-intervention to 42% post-intervention, although the results were not significantly different (P = 0.07). The incidence rate of renal impairment remained similar (11% vs. 12%; P = 0.85), although the annual average number of cases decreased from 4.3 before the intervention to 2.5 after. Similarly, there were no significant differences in clinical efficacy before and after the intervention (65% vs. 71%; P = 0.35). Furthermore, aminoglycoside stewardship led to a 56% cost saving.
Pharmacist-led aminoglycoside stewardship significantly improved the appropriate use of aminoglycosides and decreased the associated costs. Thus, pharmacist involvement is essential for the proper use of aminoglycosides. However, many patients required aminoglycoside dose reductions despite the pharmacist's guideline-based dosing design. Therefore, further accumulation of information on the management of aminoglycoside blood concentration may be necessary for the revision of these guidelines.
氨基糖苷类药物对于治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染和心内膜炎至关重要。然而,氨基糖苷类药物具有显著的肾毒性风险,因此需要谨慎选择剂量并进行治疗药物监测。治疗药物监测对于将风险降至最低至关重要;然而,很少有机构常规开展此项工作。本研究旨在评估药师主导的治疗药物监测干预对氨基糖苷类药物使用趋势和临床结局的影响。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年至2023年间接受氨基糖苷类药物治疗的263例患者。2017年开始了由药师主导的治疗药物监测干预,重点是监测肾功能、记录患者体重以及密切管理氨基糖苷类药物浓度。分析了氨基糖苷类药物使用趋势和肾脏结局。
在研究期间,初始处方时氨基糖苷类药物的合理使用率从49%提高到了82%(P < 0.01)。初始处方时由药师进行剂量设计的比例从干预前的21%显著增加到干预后的60%(P < 0.01)。药师在初始剂量设计中的干预比例随时间增加。测量氨基糖苷类药物血药浓度的患者比例从干预前的53%显著增加到干预后的72%(P < 0.01)。在不调整剂量的情况下,能够通过初始氨基糖苷类药物剂量维持目标血药浓度的患者比例从干预前的31%增加到干预后的42%,尽管结果无显著差异(P = 0.07)。肾功能损害的发生率保持相似(11%对12%;P = 0.85),尽管年均病例数从干预前的4.3例降至干预后的2.5例。同样,干预前后的临床疗效无显著差异(65%对71%;P = 0.35)。此外,氨基糖苷类药物管理导致成本节省了56%。
药师主导的氨基糖苷类药物管理显著改善了氨基糖苷类药物的合理使用并降低了相关成本。因此,药师的参与对于氨基糖苷类药物的合理使用至关重要。然而,尽管药师依据指南进行剂量设计,但仍有许多患者需要减少氨基糖苷类药物剂量。因此,可能需要进一步积累氨基糖苷类药物血药浓度管理方面的信息,以修订这些指南。