Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena,190, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, 30130-090, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Professor Alfredo Balena,190, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, 30130-090, Brazil.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 21;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01501-7.
Food deserts are neighborhoods with little or no access to healthy food, whereas food swamps are neighborhoods where unhealthy food options prevail over healthy ones. The main aims of the current study are to feature and compare the neighborhoods of food deserts and food swamps based on social inequality.
Ecological study carried out in Belo Horizonte City, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Information about commercial food establishments derived from two different databases. It was measured by secondary governmental databases, which were virtually conferred in the present study. Census tracts were considered as analysis units and classified as food deserts and food swamps, based on the Brazilian methodology. Take into consideration the density of establishments classified as selling fresh or minimally-processed food, mixed establishments, and establishments selling ultra-processed food. The Brazilian methodology evaluates food deserts by the density of healthy establishments (establishments classified as mostly selling fresh or minimally-processed food and mixed establishments) per 10 thousand inhabitants. And the metric to evaluate food swamps considers the density of unhealthy establishments (establishments mostly selling ultra-processed food) per 10 thousand inhabitants. Information about social inequalities comprised aspects such as income, population count, number of households, number of literate individuals, race, water and energy supply, and garbage collection. The Health Vulnerability Index (HVI) was used as a synthetic social vulnerability indicator.
Neighborhoods of food deserts presented worse essential service availability, lower income per capita, and smaller mean number of literate individuals. Census tracts classified as food swamps presented better socio-demographic conditions than those areas food deserts. Neighborhoods simultaneously classified as food deserts and food swamps presented lower income per capita and were more often observed in census sectors presenting medium and high HVI.
The food environment in Belo Horizonte was featured by the strong presence of food deserts and food swamps. However, the potential influence of these areas on food intake has changed depending on social inequalities.
食品荒漠是指获取健康食品的机会很少或没有的社区,而食品沼泽则是指不健康食品选择超过健康食品的社区。本研究的主要目的是根据社会不平等来突出和比较食品荒漠和食品沼泽的社区。
这是在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州贝洛奥里藏特市进行的一项生态研究。商业食品场所的信息来自两个不同的数据库。通过二级政府数据库进行测量,这些数据库在本研究中被实际引用。将普查地段视为分析单位,并根据巴西方法将其分类为食品荒漠和食品沼泽。考虑到出售新鲜或低加工食品、混合食品和超加工食品的机构密度。巴西方法通过每 10000 名居民健康机构(主要销售新鲜或低加工食品和混合机构的机构)的密度来评估食品荒漠。评估食品沼泽的指标考虑了每 10000 名居民中不健康机构(主要销售超加工食品的机构)的密度。社会不平等信息包括收入、人口数量、家庭数量、识字人数、种族、供水和供电以及垃圾收集等方面。健康脆弱性指数(HVI)被用作综合社会脆弱性指标。
食品荒漠社区的基本服务可用性较差,人均收入较低,识字人数较少。被归类为食品沼泽的普查地段的社会人口状况优于食品荒漠地区。同时被归类为食品荒漠和食品沼泽的社区的人均收入较低,并且更常见于中高 HVI 的普查部门。
贝洛奥里藏特的食品环境以食品荒漠和食品沼泽的大量存在为特征。然而,这些地区对食物摄入的潜在影响因社会不平等而发生了变化。