• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同技术测量牙种植体稳定性。

Measurement of dental implant stability by two different techniques.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Private Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;24(7):973-977. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_220_20.

DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_220_20
PMID:34290171
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To measure dental implant stability by two noninvasive methods which are vibration characteristics of the periodontium Periotest® and resonance frequency analysis Osstell. The objective of this comparative study was to assess the correlation of these 2 techniques in clinic. Materials and Methods: Implant stability of 54 clinically stable unloaded implants in 10 males and females (mean age: 52.05 ± 8.42) was measured in triplicate by Osstell and Periotest. The measurements were taken first in the same day of the surgery and the second was 4 weeks later. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 (P < 0.05). Results: The mean values were 75.90 ± 5.13 ISQ for the resonance frequency analysis and - 4.31 ± 1.43 PTVs for Periotest. There was no significant difference in first and the second measurements accordance with gender. However, a significant difference was shown in ratio of percentage change for both PTV and ISQ values in female patients. There was a positive strong correlation between mean percentage changes of PTV and ISQ values (P = 0.811, P = 0.001). The only significant difference between ISQ values and implant length was observed at 4 weeks (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Although Periotest values appear to be more susceptible to clinical conditions, both measuring techniques are applicable in the assessment of implant stability.

摘要

目的

使用两种非侵入性方法(牙周组织的振动特性 Periotest® 和共振频率分析 Osstell)来测量种植牙的稳定性。本研究的目的是评估这两种技术在临床中的相关性。

材料与方法

对 10 名男性和女性(平均年龄:52.05 ± 8.42)的 54 个临床稳定、未负重种植体进行三次 Osstell 和 Periotest 测量。第一次测量在手术当天进行,第二次测量在 4 周后进行。使用 SPSS 22.0 进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。

结果

共振频率分析的平均数值为 75.90 ± 5.13 ISQ,Periotest 的平均数值为-4.31 ± 1.43 PTVs。性别方面,第一次和第二次测量的平均值没有显著差异。然而,女性患者的 PTV 和 ISQ 值的百分比变化比值存在显著差异。PTV 和 ISQ 值的平均百分比变化之间存在正强相关(P = 0.811,P = 0.001)。仅在第 4 周时观察到 ISQ 值与种植体长度之间存在显著差异(P = 0.037)。

结论

虽然 Periotest 值似乎更容易受到临床条件的影响,但这两种测量技术均可应用于评估种植牙的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Measurement of dental implant stability by two different techniques.两种不同技术测量牙种植体稳定性。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;24(7):973-977. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_220_20.
2
A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.两种评估种植体稳定性的非侵入性技术的比较研究:Periotest和Osstell Mentor
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Apr;107(4):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.026. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
3
Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.通过共振频率分析和阻尼能力评估测量牙种植体稳定性:两种技术在一项临床试验中的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):525-30.
4
Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment.种植体稳定性测量的临床研究,使用 Periotest 和 Osstell mentor 与骨质量评估之间的关系。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Mar;113(3):e35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.003.
5
Correlation of Implant Stability Between Two Noninvasive Methods Using Submerged and Nonsubmerged Healing Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial.两种非侵入性方法(淹没式愈合与非淹没式愈合)在种植体稳定性方面的相关性:一项随机临床试验。
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Dec 1;46(6):571-579. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00130.
6
The Evaluation of the Reliability of Periotest for Implant Stability Measurements: An In Vitro Study.用于种植体稳定性测量的Periotest可靠性评估:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):e90-5. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00303. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
7
Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study.利用敲击响应验证种植体稳定性测量设备:一项临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0.
8
Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.基于共振频率和阻尼能力的种植体稳定性测量参数:比较有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):532-9.
9
Measurement of mini-implant stability using resonance frequency analysis.采用共振频率分析测量微型种植体稳定性。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):230-8. doi: 10.2319/043012-354.1. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
10
Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.共振频率分析:两种临床仪器比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):308-312. doi: 10.1111/cid.12598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Stability of dental implants using AnyCheck and Osstell devices.使用AnyCheck和Osstell设备的牙种植体稳定性
Bioinformation. 2025 Mar 31;21(3):305-308. doi: 10.6026/973206300210305. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effect of Photobiomodulation Therapy on the Stability of Orthodontic Mini-implants in Human and Animal Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.光生物调节疗法对人类和动物研究中正畸微型种植体稳定性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Jun 14;13:e27. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.27. eCollection 2022.