Department of Orthodontics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Angle Orthod. 2013 Mar;83(2):230-8. doi: 10.2319/043012-354.1. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
To investigate whether resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is suitable to measure orthodontic mini-implant stability. Implant size significantly affects the level of resonance frequency. Regarding the operating mode of RFA, it has to be proven whether the resonance frequency of mini-implants in bone fits the range of frequency emitted by the Osstell ISQ device.
For this purpose the SmartPegs in the Osstell ISQ device were modified to fit with the inner screw thread of orthodontic mini-implants, and 110 mini-implants were inserted into porcine pelvic bone. RFA was performed parallel and perpendicular to the run of superficial bone fibers. A suitability test, Periotest, was also performed in the same directions. Compacta thickness was measured using cone-beam computed tomography. Correlation tests and linear regression analysis were carried out between the three methods.
The RFA showed a mean Implant Stability Quotient value of 36.36 ± 2.67, and the Periotest mean value was -2.10 ± 1.17. The differences between the two directions of measurement were statistically significant (P > .001) for RFA and the Periotest. There was a high correlation between RFA and the Periotest (r = -0.90) and between RFA and compacta thickness (r = 0.71). The comparison between the Periotest and compacta thickness showed a correlation coefficient of r = -0.64.
The present results suggest that RFA is feasible as a measurement method for orthodontic mini-implant stability. As a consequence, it could be used for clinical evaluation of current stability and allow stability-related loading of mini-implants to reduce the failure rate.
研究共振频率分析(RFA)是否适用于测量正畸微型种植体的稳定性。种植体的尺寸会显著影响共振频率的水平。鉴于 RFA 的操作模式,需要证明骨内微型种植体的共振频率是否符合 Osstell ISQ 设备发射的频率范围。
为此,对 Osstell ISQ 设备中的 SmartPegs 进行了修改,以适应正畸微型种植体的内螺纹,并将 110 个微型种植体植入猪骨盆骨中。RFA 沿与浅层骨纤维平行和垂直的方向进行。同样的方向也进行了 Periotest 适用性测试。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量皮质骨厚度。对三种方法之间进行了相关性检验和线性回归分析。
RFA 的平均种植体稳定性指数值为 36.36 ± 2.67,Periotest 的平均数值为-2.10 ± 1.17。两种测量方向的 RFA 和 Periotest 之间的差异均具有统计学意义(P >.001)。RFA 与 Periotest 之间(r = -0.90)以及 RFA 与皮质骨厚度之间(r = 0.71)具有高度相关性。Periotest 与皮质骨厚度之间的相关性系数为 r = -0.64。
本研究结果表明,RFA 是一种可行的正畸微型种植体稳定性测量方法。因此,它可用于临床评估当前稳定性,并允许基于稳定性的微型种植体加载,以降低失败率。