Gelsomino Sandro, Tetta Cecilia, Matteucci Francesco, Del Pace Stefano, Parise Orlando, Prifti Edvin, Dokollari Aleksander, Parise Gianmarco, Micali Linda Renata, La Meir Mark, Bonacchi Massimo
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht - CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Cardiac Surgery Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 5;8:622480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.622480. eCollection 2021.
Ischemic stroke after coronary artery bypass (CABG) has been often linked to aortic manipulation during surgery. The objective of the study was to estimate the rate of postoperative ischemic stroke within 30 days from CABG by surgical risk factors alone or in combination. The multinomial propensity score for multiple treatments was used to create six models with a total of 16,255 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG. For each model, a different classification variable was used to stratify patients. Balance achieved in all models was substantial, enabling unbiased estimation of the treatment estimand. Both off-pump techniques with (0.009; 95% CI 0.006-0.011) or without proximal anastomoses (0.005; 0.005-0.003), and surgery performed on the beating heart using cardiopulmonary bypass with (0.009; 0.006-0.011) or without proximal anastomoses (0.024; 0.021-0.029) showed a mean stroke estimate significantly lower than the other techniques. Off-pump surgery and on-pump surgery without an aortic cross-clamp yielded nearly equal incidences of stroke (0.012; 0.008-0.015 and 0.018; 0.012-0.023, respectively). Using an aortic cross-clamp significantly increased the stroke estimate (0.075; 0.061-0.088), whereas using a side-biting clamp did not (0.039; 0.033-0.044). The number of aortic touches (0.029; 0.026-0.031) and the number of proximal anastomoses (0.044; 0.035-0.047) did not significantly increase the incidence of stroke. Aortic cross-clamping was found to be the primary cause of post-CABG ischemic stroke. Instead, additional aortic manipulation from a side-biting clamp, on-pump surgery, multiple aortic touches, number of proximal anastomoses, and aortic cannulation were found not to increase the estimate of stroke significantly. Further research on this topic is warranted.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的缺血性卒中常与手术期间的主动脉操作有关。本研究的目的是单独或联合使用手术风险因素来估计CABG后30天内的术后缺血性卒中发生率。采用多治疗多项倾向评分法,对16255例连续接受单纯CABG的患者建立了6个模型。对于每个模型,使用不同的分类变量对患者进行分层。所有模型均实现了显著的平衡,从而能够对治疗估计值进行无偏估计。采用带近端吻合(0.009;95%CI 0.006 - 0.011)或不带近端吻合(0.005;0.005 - 0.003)的非体外循环技术,以及采用带近端吻合(0.009;0.006 - 0.011)或不带近端吻合(0.024;0.021 - 0.029)的体外循环在心脏跳动时进行手术,其平均卒中估计值均显著低于其他技术。非体外循环手术和无主动脉阻断的体外循环手术的卒中发生率几乎相等(分别为0.012;0.008 - 0.015和0.018;0.012 - 0.023)。使用主动脉阻断钳显著增加了卒中估计值(0.075;0.061 - 0.088),而使用侧咬钳则未增加(0.039;0.033 - 0.044)。主动脉触碰次数(0.029;0.026 - 0.031)和近端吻合次数(0.044;0.035 - 0.047)并未显著增加卒中发生率。发现主动脉阻断是CABG后缺血性卒中的主要原因。相反,侧咬钳的额外主动脉操作、体外循环手术、多次主动脉触碰、近端吻合次数和主动脉插管并未显著增加卒中估计值。有必要对该主题进行进一步研究。