• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前锥形活检与根治性子宫切除术后复发的关系。

Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06145-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-021-06145-0
PMID:34291339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8782799/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate association of preoperative cone biopsy with the probability of recurrent disease after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study. Patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with LVSI to IIA2 and squamous, adenosquamous and adenocarcinoma subtype were included. Patients were analyzed for general characteristics and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

In total, of 480 patients with cervical cancer, 183 patients met the inclusion criteria (117 with laparoscopic and 66 with open surgery). The median tumor diameter was 25.0 mm (range 4.6-70.0 mm) with 66 (36.2%) patients having tumors smaller than 2 cm. During median follow-up of 54.0 months (range 0-166.0 months), the RFS for the laparoscopic cohort was 93.2% and 87.5% at 3 and 4.5 years, and 79.3% for the open cohort after 3 and 4.5 years, respectively. In total, 17 (9.3%) patients developed recurrent disease, 9 (7.3%) after laparoscopic, and 8 (12.1%) after open surgery. No preoperative cone biopsy (OR 9.60, 95% CI 2.14-43.09) as well as tumor diameter > 2 cm (OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.20-24.25) were significantly associated with increased risk for recurrence. In multivariate analysis, only missing preoperative cone biopsy was significantly associated with increased risk for recurrence (OR 5.90, 95% CI 1.11-31.29) CONCLUSION: There appears to be a subgroup of patients (preoperative cone biopsy, tumor diameter < 2 cm) with excellent survival and low risk for recurrence after radical hysterectomy which might benefit from the advantages of laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

目的

评估术前宫颈锥切术与宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后疾病复发的概率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究。纳入了 IA1 期伴有 LVSI 至 IIA2 期且为鳞癌、腺鳞癌和腺癌亚型的宫颈癌患者。分析患者的一般特征和无复发生存率(RFS)。

结果

在总共 480 例宫颈癌患者中,有 183 例符合纳入标准(117 例行腹腔镜手术,66 例行开腹手术)。肿瘤的中位直径为 25.0mm(范围 4.6-70.0mm),其中 66 例(36.2%)患者的肿瘤直径小于 2cm。在中位随访 54.0 个月(范围 0-166.0 个月)期间,腹腔镜组的 RFS 分别为 93.2%和 87.5%,3 年和 4.5 年时分别为 79.3%,开腹组分别为 3 年和 4.5 年时分别为 9.3%和 8.1%。总共有 17 例(9.3%)患者出现复发疾病,9 例(7.3%)发生在腹腔镜手术后,8 例(12.1%)发生在开腹手术后。术前无宫颈锥切术(OR 9.60,95%CI 2.14-43.09)以及肿瘤直径>2cm(OR 5.39,95%CI 1.20-24.25)与复发风险增加显著相关。在多变量分析中,只有缺失术前宫颈锥切术与复发风险增加显著相关(OR 5.90,95%CI 1.11-31.29)。

结论

似乎有一小部分患者(术前宫颈锥切术、肿瘤直径<2cm)在根治性子宫切除术后具有极好的生存和低复发风险,他们可能受益于腹腔镜手术的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/8782799/d15dba5ffd84/404_2021_6145_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/8782799/242b6cfd1344/404_2021_6145_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/8782799/d15dba5ffd84/404_2021_6145_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/8782799/242b6cfd1344/404_2021_6145_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddf1/8782799/d15dba5ffd84/404_2021_6145_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy.术前锥形活检与根治性子宫切除术后复发的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06145-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.术前锥切术与 FIGO 2018 期 IB1 宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术术后复发的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1901-1909. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06816-6. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后复发的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
4
Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌患者术前锥切与复发风险的多中心研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
5
Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).经阴道根治性子宫切除术:来自阿根廷意大利医院的肿瘤学结果分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):863-868. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000323.
6
Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌患者的复发模式:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jul;30(7):987-992. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001381. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的长期肿瘤学结局及复发模式:挪威镭医院的经验
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Aug;162(2):284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.028. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
8
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
9
Carcinomatosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated with Robotic Radical Hysterectomy: Recurrence Patterns, Risk Factors, and Survival.机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的癌转移:复发模式、危险因素和生存。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):2006-2013. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11052-4. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.微小浸润性宫颈癌的外科治疗:对根治性有影响的病理特征分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):694-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000416.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure.早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的结局,无论是否进行过先前的宫颈切除术。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 29;16(11):2051. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112051.
2
Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Surgical Therapy for Patients with Stage IA2-IIB1 Cervical Cancer.妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)子宫委员会关于IA2-IIB1期宫颈癌患者手术治疗的声明。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Oct 5;83(10):1199-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2160-3279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.腹腔镜与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗可见或不可见肿瘤的ⅠB1 期和肿瘤直径<2 cm 的宫颈癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(2):e17. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e17. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.全腹腔镜与传统开腹腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗宫颈癌的临床、手术、肿瘤学和功能结局:301 例宫颈癌患者的研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;32(1):e10. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e10. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
术前锥切术与 FIGO 2018 期 IB1 宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术术后复发的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1901-1909. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06816-6. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking is associated with development of platinum-refractory or -resistant disease.新辅助化疗和间隔减瘤术之后行 HIPEC 与铂类耐药或难治性疾病的发展相关。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Apr;161(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.035. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
4
Time to accept a new old standard of care in cervical cancer.是时候接受宫颈癌护理的一种新的旧标准了。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1278-1279. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001870. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.SUCCOR 研究:一项国际欧洲队列观察性研究,比较了微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB1 期宫颈癌患者的效果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的比较:基于肿瘤直径的肿瘤学结局。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1308-1316. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001504. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后复发的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与开放性根治性子宫切除术的生存比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1019-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694.
9
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.早期宫颈癌患者行腹式或腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的生存情况:全国性队列研究及文献复习。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.全国范围内采用机器人微创手术治疗早期宫颈癌后的生存情况 - 一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Mar 5.