Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Apr;31(7-8):869-877. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15939. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
The purpose of this study was to report the psychometric properties, including validity and reliability, of the decision fatigue scale (DFS).
Decision fatigue may impair nurses' ability to make sound clinical decisions and negatively impact patient care. Given the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being and the workplace environment, decision fatigue may be even more apparent among clinical nurses. Valid assessment of this condition among clinical nurses may inform supportive interventions to mitigate the negative sequelae associated with states of decision fatigue.
This study was a secondary analysis of a parent study using a cross-sectional descriptive design.
A convenience sample of 160 staff nurses was recruited online from across the United States. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and subjective measures of decision fatigue, nursing practice environment scale and traumatic stress. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), correlation coefficients and internal consistency reliability coefficients were computed to examine the DFS's validity and reliability within this sample.
The EFA yielded a single factor, 9-item version of the DFS. The DFS scores were strongly correlated with traumatic stress and moderately correlated with the nursing practice environment, and the scale displayed appropriate internal consistency.
This is the first known study to provide evidence of the DFS's validity and reliability in a sample of registered nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study provide evidence of a reliable and valid assessment instrument for decision fatigue that can be used to measure the burden of decision-making among registered nurses.
Given the relationship between traumatic stress and the nursing work environment, decision fatigue may be a modifiable target for interventions that can enhance the quality of decision-making among clinical nurses.
本研究旨在报告决策疲劳量表(DFS)的心理测量学特性,包括有效性和可靠性。
决策疲劳可能会损害护士做出正确临床决策的能力,并对患者护理产生负面影响。鉴于 COVID-19 大流行对心理健康和工作场所环境的负面影响,临床护士的决策疲劳可能更为明显。对临床护士进行这种情况的有效评估可以为支持性干预措施提供信息,以减轻与决策疲劳状态相关的负面后果。
这是一项使用横断面描述性设计的母研究的二次分析。
从美国各地在线招募了 160 名工作人员护士作为方便样本。参与者完成了人口统计学问卷以及决策疲劳、护理实践环境量表和创伤应激的主观测量。进行探索性因素分析(EFA)、相关系数和内部一致性可靠性系数,以检验该样本中 DFS 的有效性和可靠性。
EFA 产生了 DFS 的单一因素、9 项版本。DFS 得分与创伤应激强烈相关,与护理实践环境中度相关,并且该量表显示出适当的内部一致性。
这是在 COVID-19 大流行期间工作的注册护士样本中首次提供 DFS 有效性和可靠性证据的研究。本研究的结果为决策疲劳提供了可靠有效的评估工具,可用于衡量注册护士的决策负担。
鉴于创伤应激和护理工作环境之间的关系,决策疲劳可能是可以增强临床护士决策质量的干预措施的可修改目标。