Department of Psychology.
Psychol Assess. 2021 Nov;33(11):1038-1049. doi: 10.1037/pas0001052. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
Despite being multifaceted in nature, positive emotional (PE) experiences often are studied using only global PE ratings, and measures assessing more specific PE facets do not converge in their assessment approaches. To address these issues, we examined hierarchical factor structures of ratings of positive emotionality, which reflect propensities toward experiencing PE, in both online community adult ( = 375) and undergraduate ( = 447) samples. Preregistered analyses indicated (a) a broad distinction between tendencies to experience social affection and other PE types, and that (b) PE ratings can be differentiated by as many as four replicable factors of Joviality, . These PE dimensions were associated with distinct personality and psychopathology profiles. Examples of these distinctive associations included Joviality displaying robust positive associations with grandiosity and exhibitionism; conversely, although Social Affection and Joviality were strongly correlated, Social Affection showed associations in the opposite direction with grandiosity and exhibitionism. Other notable results include Serenity (e.g., feeling relaxed) showing negative associations with negative emotionality at a magnitude indicating that Serenity may reflect low levels of negative emotionality to a considerable degree. Collectively, these results highlight the need to consider distinct PE facets in addition to global PE ratings when assessing PE, as important nuance may be lost otherwise. Furthermore, our results indicate the need for additional research clarifying PE structure at different levels of abstraction to inform future measure development efforts and assessment approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管积极情绪(PE)体验具有多面性,但通常仅使用全球 PE 评分来研究积极情绪体验,而评估更具体的积极情绪体验的方法在评估方法上并不一致。为了解决这些问题,我们在在线社区成年人(n=375)和大学生(n=447)样本中检验了积极情感倾向的评分的层次因素结构。预先注册的分析表明:(a)体验社会情感和其他 PE 类型的倾向之间存在明显区别;(b)PE 评分可以通过多达四个可复制的因素(Joviality、Elation、Positive Valence、Serenity)来区分。这些 PE 维度与不同的人格和精神病理学特征相关。这些独特关联的例子包括:Joviality 与浮夸和表现欲呈强烈正相关;相反,尽管社会情感和 Joviality 相关性很强,但社会情感与浮夸和表现欲的关联方向相反。其他值得注意的结果包括:宁静(如感到放松)与负性情绪呈负相关,关联程度表明宁静在很大程度上可能反映了低水平的负性情绪。总的来说,这些结果强调了在评估积极情绪时,除了全球积极情绪评分外,还需要考虑不同的积极情绪维度,否则可能会失去重要的细微差别。此外,我们的结果表明需要进一步研究,以澄清不同抽象层次的积极情绪结构,为未来的测量发展工作和评估方法提供信息。