Suppr超能文献

三维导航与传统透视在骨盆后环固定中的应用比较。

Use of 3D Navigation Versus Traditional Fluoroscopy for Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation.

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(4):229-234. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20210621-04. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

Abstract

Unstable pelvic ring disruption is most commonly treated with closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation. Traditional methods involve screw placement under fluoroscopic imaging, but with recent technologic advances, intraoperative 3D navigation can now be used to help with the insertion of sacroiliac screws. Various cadaver studies have shown that placement of sacroiliac screws under 3D navigation is more accurate than placement under traditional fluoroscopic guidance. This retrospective review of 134 patients evaluated the clinical use of 3D navigation vs traditional fluoroscopy for sacroiliac screw insertion at an urban level I trauma center. Analysis of surgical data showed a significantly longer imaging time with the conventional method compared with the more experimental 3D navigation (204.06 seconds vs 66.90 seconds, <.01). Further, a significantly larger radiation dose to both the patient and the staff was seen with traditional fluoroscopy (80.1 mGy for each) compared with that of 3D navigation (39.0 mGy and 25.1 mGy, respectively). No statistically significant difference was seen for outcome or follow-up variables between the 2 extrapolated groups. These variables included length of hospital stay, infection, nerve injury, and hardware breakage. The authors advocate that 3D navigated sacroiliac screws are safe and effective for pelvic ring stabilization; this method may be especially applicable in certain difficult imaging situations, such as morbid obesity, bowel gas interference, and overlapping pelvic structures that make the sacral corridor difficult to discern with traditional 2D fluoroscopy. Safe placement of transiliac-transsacral screws (<.01) occurred with 3D navigation, and there was a statistically significant increase in adequate screw placement in multiple sacral segments compared with single-level stabilization (<.01). [. 2021;44(4):229-234.].

摘要

不稳定骨盆环骨折脱位最常采用闭合复位和经皮螺钉固定治疗。传统方法是在透视成像下放置螺钉,但随着最近技术的进步,术中 3D 导航现在可用于帮助骶髂螺钉的插入。各种尸体研究表明,在 3D 导航下放置骶髂螺钉比传统透视引导下放置更准确。本回顾性研究对 134 例患者进行了评估,比较了在城市一级创伤中心使用 3D 导航与传统透视引导进行骶髂螺钉插入的临床效果。对手术数据的分析显示,传统方法的影像学时间明显长于更具实验性的 3D 导航(204.06 秒比 66.90 秒,<.01)。此外,与 3D 导航(分别为 39.0 mGy 和 25.1 mGy)相比,传统透视会导致患者和医务人员受到更大的辐射剂量(每次 80.1 mGy)。两组之间在结果或随访变量上没有统计学上的显著差异。这些变量包括住院时间、感染、神经损伤和硬件断裂。作者主张 3D 导航骶髂螺钉是安全有效的骨盆环稳定方法;这种方法在某些困难的成像情况下可能特别适用,例如病态肥胖、肠气干扰和重叠的骨盆结构,这些结构使得骶骨通道难以用传统的 2D 透视识别。3D 导航下安全置入髂骨-骶骨螺钉(<.01),与单节段稳定相比,多个骶骨节段的螺钉置入足够的比例显著增加(<.01)。[2021;44(4):229-234。]。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验