Suppr超能文献

近视错误在学校视力筛查不合格学生中的发现。

Refractive Error Findings in Students Who Failed School-based Vision Screening.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;29(4):426-434. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1954664. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report refractive error findings in Baltimore City schoolchildren who failed school-based vision screenings.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis, students pre-kindergarten through 8 grade who failed screenings during school years 2016-2019 received an eye examination, including non-cycloplegic autorefraction and visual acuity (VA) measurements. Refractive error was identified when there was at least: -0.50 diopter (D) spherical equivalent (SE) myopia, +0.50D SE hyperopia, 1.00D astigmatism, or 1.00D anisometropia in either eye. Generalized estimating equation models were used to identify factors associated with clinically significant refractive error, defined as decreased VA and more severe refractive error.

RESULTS

Of 7520 students who failed screening, 6627 (88%) were analyzed. Clinically significant refractive error and any refractive error were found in 2352 (35.5%) and 5952 (89.8%) students, respectively. Mild myopia (45%, -0.50 D to <-3.00 D SE) and low astigmatism (47%, 1.00 D to <3.00 D cylinder) were the most prevalent types of refractive error. Proportions of students with myopia increased with higher grade levels (P<0.001). Myopia and astigmatism were more common in black and Latinx. Risk factors for clinically significant refractive error included higher grades (odds ratios [OR] ranged from 1.30 to 2.19 compared with 1 grade, P < .05) and Latinx ethnicity (OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.08-1.59).

CONCLUSION

A Baltimore school-based vision program identified a substantial number of students with refractive error in a high-poverty urban community. Over 1/3 students who failed vision screening had clinically significant refractive error, with black and Latinx students at higher risk of having myopia and astigmatism.

摘要

目的

报告在巴尔的摩市学校视力筛查中失败的学童的屈光不正发现。

方法

在这项横断面分析中,2016-2019 学年在学校筛查中失败的幼儿园至 8 年级学生接受了眼部检查,包括非睫状肌麻痹自动折射和视力(VA)测量。当至少一只眼睛存在以下情况时,确定为屈光不正:-0.50 屈光度(D)球镜等效(SE)近视、+0.50D SE 远视、1.00D 散光或 1.00D 屈光参差。使用广义估计方程模型来确定与临床显著屈光不正相关的因素,定义为视力下降和更严重的屈光不正。

结果

在 7520 名筛查失败的学生中,有 6627 名(88%)进行了分析。2352 名(35.5%)和 5952 名(89.8%)学生分别发现临床显著屈光不正和任何屈光不正。最常见的屈光不正类型是轻度近视(45%,-0.50 D 至<-3.00 D SE)和低度散光(47%,1.00 D 至<3.00 D 散光)。随着年级水平的升高,近视学生的比例增加(P<0.001)。黑人和拉丁裔学生中近视和散光更为常见。临床显著屈光不正的危险因素包括较高年级(与 1 年级相比,比值比[OR]范围为 1.30 至 2.19,P<0.05)和拉丁裔种族(OR=1.31,95%CI:1.08-1.59)。

结论

巴尔的摩市学校视力计划在一个高贫困的城市社区中发现了大量的屈光不正学生。超过 1/3 的视力筛查失败的学生有临床显著的屈光不正,黑人和拉丁裔学生患近视和散光的风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验