Suppr超能文献

急诊科等待时间和住院时间指标的调查

Investigating Indicators of Waiting Time and Length of Stay in Emergency Departments.

作者信息

Al Nhdi Nojoud, Al Asmari Hajar, Al Thobaity Abdulellah

机构信息

Nursing Department, Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Nursing Department, Health directorate in Jeddah, East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 16;13:311-318. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S316366. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate potential indicators of patients' waiting time and length of stay in emergency departments (ED) at the Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in order to determine the causes of delayed patient care and to recommend clinical implications to achieve a better ED system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This exploratory study was conducted in the EDs at four tertiary hospitals of MOH. A random sample of 1360 people was tested from December 2019 to February 2020. Data included patient Canadian Triage Acuity and System (CTAS) level, registration time, triage time, physician examination time, decision time, and disposition time. Descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation were used according to SPSS (version 24).

RESULTS

The findings showed that 89.6% of total emergency patients were categorized as levels 3, 4 and 5. Around 73.5% of emergency patients stayed less than 4 hours due to registration or triage to disposition, while 26.5% of those patients stayed more than 4 hours.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients' total stay in EDs was less than 4 hours. According to ED international standard of length of stay, this is appropriate. The highest effective indicator in total length of stay was the decision to disposition time in EDs.

摘要

目的

调查卫生部医院急诊科患者等待时间和住院时间的潜在指标,以确定患者护理延迟的原因,并提出临床建议以建立更好的急诊系统。

材料与方法

本探索性研究在卫生部的四家三级医院急诊科进行。2019年12月至2020年2月对1360人进行了随机抽样测试。数据包括患者的加拿大分诊 acuity 和系统(CTAS)级别、登记时间、分诊时间、医生检查时间、决策时间和处置时间。根据SPSS(版本24)进行描述性统计、多变量分析、多元线性回归分析和Pearson相关性分析。

结果

结果显示,89.6%的急诊患者被归类为3、4和5级。约73.5%的急诊患者从登记或分诊到处置的停留时间少于4小时,而26.5%的患者停留时间超过4小时。

结论

大多数患者在急诊科的总停留时间少于4小时。根据急诊科住院时间的国际标准,这是合适的。总住院时间中最有效的指标是急诊科的决策到处置时间。

相似文献

1
Investigating Indicators of Waiting Time and Length of Stay in Emergency Departments.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 16;13:311-318. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S316366. eCollection 2021.
8
Predictive validity of a computerized emergency triage tool.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;14(1):16-21. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.021.
9
Flow impacts of hot/cold zone infection control procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the emergency department.
CJEM. 2022 Jun;24(4):390-396. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00278-0. Epub 2022 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic contagion potential framework for optimizing infection control in healthcare.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;13:1566854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566854. eCollection 2025.
3
Identifying the Main Bottlenecks in the Workflow of Saudi Arabian Emergency Departments (EDs).
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Feb 24;2025:4239274. doi: 10.1155/jonm/4239274. eCollection 2025.
4
Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department in public hospital, Padang, Indonesia.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2025 Jan-Feb;81(1):52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.11.009. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
5
Obstacles and Challenges Affecting Quality Indicators in a Complex Tertiary Emergency Center.
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Jul 31;7(4):162-174. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-10. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Overcoming challenges in nursing disaster preparedness and response: an umbrella review.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 14;23(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02226-y.
10
Strategies to Measure and Improve Emergency Department Performance: A Review.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):e52879. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52879. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Length of Stay in the Emergency Department and Its Associated Factors at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 9;12:227-235. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S254239. eCollection 2020.
2
Long emergency department length of stay: A concept analysis.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;53:100930. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100930. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Emergency medicine in Saudi Arabia: a century of progress and a bright vision for the future.
Int J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul 8;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0232-0.
4
Causes of Prolonged Emergency Department Stay; a Cross-sectional Action Research.
Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb 15;2(2):e18. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.58. eCollection 2018 Spring.
6
The National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) and the 4-hour rule: time to review the target.
Med J Aust. 2016 May 16;204(9):354. doi: 10.5694/mja15.01177.
7
Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia.
Int J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;8(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0080-5. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Hospital factors impact variation in emergency department length of stay more than physician factors.
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;15(2):158-64. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.12.6860.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验