Verma Renu, Kim Eugene, Martínez-Colón Giovanny Joel, Jagannathan Prasanna, Rustagi Arjun, Parsonnet Julie, Bonilla Hector, Khosla Chaitan, Holubar Marisa, Subramanian Aruna, Singh Upinder, Maldonado Yvonne, Blish Catherine A, Andrews Jason R
Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 11;8(7):ofab310. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab310. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Given the persistence of viral RNA in clinically recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) have been reported as potential molecular viability markers for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, few data are available on their longitudinal kinetics, compared with genomic RNA (gRNA), in clinical samples.
We analyzed 536 samples from 205 patients with COVID-19 from placebo-controlled, outpatient trials of peginterferon Lambda-1a (Lambda; n = 177) and favipiravir (n = 359). Nasal swabs were collected at 3 time points in the Lambda (days 1, 4, and 6) and favipiravir (days 1, 5, and 10) trials. N-gene gRNA and sgRNA were quantified by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. To investigate the decay kinetics in vitro, we measured gRNA and sgRNA in A549 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, following treatment with remdesivir or dimethylsulfoxide control.
At 6 days in the Lambda trial and 10 days in the favipiravir trial, sgRNA remained detectable in 51.6% (32/62) and 49.5% (51/106) of the samples, respectively. Cycle threshold (Ct) values for gRNA and sgRNA were highly linearly correlated (marginal = 0.83), and the rate of increase did not differ significantly in the Lambda trial (1.36 cycles/d vs 1.36 cycles/d; = .97) or the favipiravir trial (1.03 cycles/d vs 0.94 cycles/d; = .26). From samples collected 15-21 days after symptom onset, sgRNA was detectable in 48.1% (40/83) of participants. In SARS-CoV-2-infected A549 cells treated with remdesivir, the rate of Ct increase did not differ between gRNA and sgRNA.
In clinical samples and in vitro, sgRNA was highly correlated with gRNA and did not demonstrate different decay patterns to support its application as a viability marker.
鉴于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)临床康复患者体内病毒RNA持续存在,亚基因组RNA(sgRNA)已被报道为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)潜在的分子存活标志物。然而,与基因组RNA(gRNA)相比,临床样本中关于其纵向动力学的数据较少。
我们分析了来自205例COVID-19患者的536份样本,这些样本来自聚乙二醇化干扰素λ-1a(λ;n = 177)和法匹拉韦(n = 359)的安慰剂对照门诊试验。在λ试验(第1、4和6天)和法匹拉韦试验(第1、5和10天)的3个时间点采集鼻拭子。通过定量逆转录聚合酶链反应对N基因gRNA和sgRNA进行定量。为了研究体外衰变动力学,我们在用瑞德西韦或二甲基亚砜对照处理后,测量感染SARS-CoV-2的A549细胞中的gRNA和sgRNA。
在λ试验的第6天和法匹拉韦试验的第10天,分别有51.6%(32/62)和49.5%(51/106)的样本中sgRNA仍可检测到。gRNA和sgRNA的循环阈值(Ct)值高度线性相关(边缘= 0.83),并且在λ试验(1.36个循环/天对1.36个循环/天;= 0.97)或法匹拉韦试验(1.03个循环/天对0.94个循环/天;= 0.26)中增加率没有显著差异。在症状出现后15 - 21天采集的样本中,48.1%(40/83)的参与者中sgRNA可检测到。在用瑞德西韦处理的感染SARS-CoV-2的A549细胞中,gRNA和sgRNA的Ct增加率没有差异。
在临床样本和体外,sgRNA与gRNA高度相关,并且没有表现出不同的衰变模式来支持其作为存活标志物的应用。