Jose Toney, Rajesh P S
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Surg J (N Y). 2021 Jul 19;7(3):e127-e131. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731446. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Appendicitis is a common differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain. Clinical evaluation alone results in high negative appendicectomy rates. Alvarado scoring is the most commonly used clinical prediction rule. The study aimed to compare the recently developed appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score with the Alvarado score. This cross-sectional observational study included patients who underwent appendicectomy for clinical suspicion of appendicitis. The clinical and laboratory parameters required for obtaining Alvarado score and AIRS were gathered. Area under ROC curve was calculated for both Alvarado score and AIRS. The study included 130 patients (77 males and 53 females). The negative appendicectomy rate was 10.7%. The perforation rate was 10.3%. The area under ROC for Alvarado score was 0.821 and for AIR score was 0.901. The Alvarado score had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 79% at score ≥6. The appendicitis inflammatory response score had a sensitivity of 98% for scores ≥5 and a specificity of 97% for score ≥6. The C-reactive protein (CRP) value was the best performing individual parameter with an area under ROC of 0.789, followed by WBC count with an area under ROC of 0.762. Appendicitis inflammatory response score is a recently developed score that outperforms the Alvarado score. AIR score has a higher specificity. The sound construction, gradation of parameters, the inclusion of CRP, and avoidance of subjective parameters make the AIR score an attractive clinical prediction rule which can decrease the rate of negative appendicectomy.
阑尾炎是右下象限疼痛常见的鉴别诊断疾病。仅依靠临床评估会导致阑尾切除术的阴性率较高。阿尔瓦拉多评分是最常用的临床预测规则。本研究旨在比较最近开发的阑尾炎炎症反应(AIR)评分与阿尔瓦拉多评分。这项横断面观察性研究纳入了因临床怀疑阑尾炎而接受阑尾切除术的患者。收集了获取阿尔瓦拉多评分和AIR评分所需的临床和实验室参数。计算了阿尔瓦拉多评分和AIR评分的ROC曲线下面积。该研究纳入了130例患者(77例男性和53例女性)。阑尾切除术阴性率为10.7%。穿孔率为10.3%。阿尔瓦拉多评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.821,AIR评分的ROC曲线下面积为0.901。阿尔瓦拉多评分在≥6分时敏感性为72%,特异性为79%。阑尾炎炎症反应评分在≥5分时敏感性为98%,在≥6分时特异性为97%。C反应蛋白(CRP)值是表现最佳的单个参数,ROC曲线下面积为0.789,其次是白细胞计数,ROC曲线下面积为0.762。阑尾炎炎症反应评分是最近开发的一种评分,其表现优于阿尔瓦拉多评分。AIR评分具有更高的特异性。合理的构建、参数分级、CRP的纳入以及主观参数的避免,使得AIR评分成为一种有吸引力的临床预测规则,可降低阑尾切除术阴性率。