• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国全国队列研究:肝细胞癌监测的效果和最佳监测间隔。

Effectiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and an Optimal Surveillance Interval: Nationwide Cohort of Korea.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Big Data Strategy Department, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):758-766. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.758.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.758
PMID:34296554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8298874/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess associations between surveillance intervals in a national hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance program and receiving curative treatment and mortality using nationwide cohort data for Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the National Health Insurance Service Database of Korea, we retrospectively identified 3201852 patients, the target population of the national HCC surveillance program, between 2008 and 2017. After exclusion, a total of 64674 HCC patients were divided based on surveillance intervals: never screened, ≤6 months (6M), 7-12 months (1Y), 13-24 months (2Y), and 25-36 months (3Y). Associations for surveillance interval with the chance to receive curative therapy and all-cause mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 6M group (51.9%) received curative therapy more often than the other groups (1Y, 48.3%; 2Y, 43.8%; 3Y, 41.3%; never screened, 34.5%). Odds ratio for receiving curative therapy among the other surveillance interval groups (1Y, 0.87; 2Y, 0.76; 3Y, 0.77; never screened, 0.57; <0.001) were significantly lower than that of the 6M group. The hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality were 1.07, 1.14, and 1.37 for 2Y, 3Y, and never screened groups. The HR for the 1Y group (0.96; =0.092) was not significantly different, and it was lower (0.91; <0.001) than that of the 6M group after adjustment for lead-time bias. Curative therapy was associated with survival benefits (HR, 0.26; <0.001).

CONCLUSION

HCC surveillance, especially at a surveillance interval of 6 months, increases the chance to receive curative therapy.

摘要

目的

利用韩国全国性队列数据评估国家肝癌(HCC)监测计划中的监测间隔与接受根治性治疗和死亡率之间的关系。

材料和方法

利用韩国国家健康保险服务数据库,我们回顾性地确定了 2008 年至 2017 年间 3201852 名符合国家 HCC 监测计划目标人群的患者。排除后,共 64674 例 HCC 患者根据监测间隔分为:从未筛查、≤6 个月(6M)、7-12 个月(1Y)、13-24 个月(2Y)和 25-36 个月(3Y)。分析了监测间隔与接受根治性治疗机会和全因死亡率之间的关系。

结果

6M 组(51.9%)接受根治性治疗的比例高于其他组(1Y 组为 48.3%;2Y 组为 43.8%;3Y 组为 41.3%;从未筛查组为 34.5%)。其他监测间隔组(1Y 组,0.87;2Y 组,0.76;3Y 组,0.77;从未筛查组,0.57;<0.001)接受根治性治疗的比值比明显低于 6M 组。全因死亡率的危险比(HRs)分别为 2Y 组 1.07、3Y 组 1.14 和从未筛查组 1.37。1Y 组的 HR(0.96;=0.092)无显著差异,且经领先时间偏倚校正后低于 6M 组(0.91;<0.001)。根治性治疗与生存获益相关(HR,0.26;<0.001)。

结论

HCC 监测,特别是 6 个月的监测间隔,增加了接受根治性治疗的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/48645de29802/ymj-62-758-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/d55bd0dbc1fb/ymj-62-758-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/dbe2f1338017/ymj-62-758-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/48645de29802/ymj-62-758-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/d55bd0dbc1fb/ymj-62-758-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/dbe2f1338017/ymj-62-758-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba28/8298874/48645de29802/ymj-62-758-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and an Optimal Surveillance Interval: Nationwide Cohort of Korea.韩国全国队列研究:肝细胞癌监测的效果和最佳监测间隔。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):758-766. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.758.
2
Association between ultrasonography screening and mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a nationwide cohort study.超声筛查与肝细胞癌患者死亡率的关联:一项全国性队列研究。
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):693-701. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308786. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
Association of Metformin Use With Cancer-Specific Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.根治性切除术后肝细胞癌患者使用二甲双胍与癌症特异性死亡率的关联:一项基于全国人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(17):e3527. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003527.
4
Intensity of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma determines survival in patients at risk in a hepatitis B-endemic area.在乙型肝炎高发地区,对肝细胞癌的监测强度决定了高危患者的生存情况。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jun;47(11):1490-1501. doi: 10.1111/apt.14623. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Changes in real-life practice for hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Republic of Korea over a 12-year period: A nationwide random sample study.韩国 12 年间肝细胞癌患者实际诊疗变化:全国随机抽样研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223678. eCollection 2019.
6
Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated With Entecavir vs Tenofovir for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.恩替卡韦与替诺福韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的肝细胞癌风险:一项韩国全国队列研究。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):30-36. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4070.
7
Impact of follow-up interval on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative ablation.根治性消融治疗后肝癌患者随访间隔的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):1186. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5069-z.
8
Application of surveillance programs for hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific Region.亚太地区肝细胞癌监测计划的应用。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jun;24(6):955-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05805.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
9
Factors affecting screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.影响肝细胞癌筛查的因素。
Ann Hepatol. 2014 Mar-Apr;13(2):204-10.
10
Effect of statin on hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes: A nationwide nested case-control study.他汀类药物对2型糖尿病患者肝细胞癌的影响:一项全国性巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;140(4):798-806. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30506. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal surveillance intervals for hepatocellular carcinoma screening in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C infection: a Taiwanese national cohort study.丙型肝炎感染的肝硬化患者肝细胞癌筛查的最佳监测间隔:一项台湾全国队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):1141. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14551-9.
2
Evolving trends in treatment patterns for hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea from 2008 to 2022: a nationwide population-based study.2008年至2022年韩国肝细胞癌治疗模式的演变趋势:一项基于全国人口的研究。
J Liver Cancer. 2024 Sep;24(2):274-285. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2024.08.13. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Similar recurrence after curative treatment of HBV-related HCC, regardless of HBV replication activity.

本文引用的文献

1
Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: hurdles, advances and prospects.肝细胞癌治疗:障碍、进展与前景
Hepat Oncol. 2018 Sep 28;5(2):HEP08. doi: 10.2217/hep-2018-0002. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.2018 韩国肝癌协会-韩国国家癌症中心肝细胞癌管理实践指南。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jul;20(7):1042-1113. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0140.
3
The Impact of National Surveillance for Liver Cancer: Results from Real-World Setting in Korea.
HBV 相关 HCC 经治愈性治疗后,无论 HBV 复制活性如何,均有相似的复发。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0307712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307712. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison between Nivolumab and Regorafenib as Second-line Systemic Therapies after Sorafenib Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.纳武利尤单抗与regorafenib 作为索拉非尼治疗失败后肝癌二线系统治疗的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2024 Jul;65(7):371-379. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0263.
5
DGAT2 Plays a Crucial Role to Control ESRRA-PROX1 Transcriptional Network to Maintain Hepatic Mitochondrial Sustainability.DGAT2 在控制 ESRRA-PROX1 转录网络以维持肝线粒体可持续性方面发挥着关键作用。
Diabetes Metab J. 2024 Sep;48(5):901-914. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2023.0368. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Performance and effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma screening in individuals with HBsAg seropositivity in China: a multicenter prospective study.中国 HBsAg 阳性个体的肝细胞癌筛查的性能和效果:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Nat Cancer. 2023 Sep;4(9):1382-1394. doi: 10.1038/s43018-023-00618-8. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
7
Gaps in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among insured patients with hepatitis B infection without cirrhosis in the United States.美国未发生肝硬化的乙型肝炎感染保险患者中肝细胞癌监测的差距。
Hepatol Commun. 2022 Dec;6(12):3443-3456. doi: 10.1002/hep4.2087. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
国家肝癌监测的影响:来自韩国真实世界设定的结果。
Gut Liver. 2020 Jan 15;14(1):108-116. doi: 10.5009/gnl18522.
4
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan as a World-Leading Model.日本肝细胞癌的管理作为全球领先模式
Liver Cancer. 2018 May;7(2):134-147. doi: 10.1159/000484619. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.欧洲肝脏研究学会临床实践指南:肝细胞癌的管理
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Current and Future Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Comprehensive Review.肝细胞癌的当前及未来治疗:最新全面综述
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Mar 28;6(1):69-78. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00031. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
9
Impact of tumor size on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who underwent liver resection.肿瘤大小对接受肝切除术的肝细胞癌患者预后的影响。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 Feb;81(2):155-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.2015 年全球疾病负担研究:1990 年至 2015 年全球、区域和国家一级原发性肝癌及相关病因负担。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1683-1691. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055.