• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与骨关节炎全髋关节和膝关节置换术相比,退行性腰椎滑脱症微创手术相对于保守治疗失败的终生增量成本-效用比。

Lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios for minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis relative to failed medical management compared with total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Crawford Eric J, Ravinsky Robert A, Coyte Peter C, Rampersaud Y Raja

机构信息

From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Crawford, Rampersaud); the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Crawford, Coyte); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Ariz. (Ravinksy); the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud); the Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud); and the Spinal Program, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;64(4):E391-E402. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015719.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.015719
PMID:34296707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8410474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) relative to failed medical management with the cost-effectiveness of hip and knee arthroplasty for matched cohorts of patients with osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with DLS undergoing MIS procedures with decompression alone or decompression and instrumented fusion between 2008 and 2014 was matched to cohorts of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and knee OA undergoing total joint replacement. Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated from the perspective of the Ontario Ministry of Health, using prospectively collected Short Form-6 Dimension utility data. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients met the inclusion criteria for the DLS cohort (n = 35 for decompression alone), with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year (mean 1.7 yr). The mean age of patients in the DLS cohort was 64.76 years, and 45 patients (68.2%) were female. For each cohort, utility scores improved from baseline to follow-up and the magnitude of the gain did not differ by group. Lifetime ICURs comparing surgical with nonsurgical care were Can$7946/QALY, Can$7104/QALY and Can$5098/QALY for the DLS, knee OA and hip OA cohorts, respectively. Subgroup analysis yielded an increased ICUR for the patients with DLS who underwent decompression and fusion (Can$9870/QALY) compared with that for the patients with DLS who underwent decompression alone (Can$5045/QALY). The rank order of the ICURs by group did not change with deterministic or probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Lifetime ICURs for MIS procedures for DLS are similar to those for total joint replacement. Future research should adopt a societal perspective and potentially capture further economic benefits of MIS procedures.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较退行性腰椎滑脱症(DLS)患者微创手术(MIS)相对于药物治疗失败的成本效益,以及匹配的骨关节炎患者队列进行髋关节和膝关节置换术的成本效益。

方法

将2008年至2014年间接受单纯减压或减压加器械融合的MIS手术的DLS患者队列与接受全关节置换的髋关节骨关节炎(OA)和膝关节OA患者队列进行匹配。从安大略省卫生部的角度计算增量成本-效用比(ICUR),使用前瞻性收集的简式6维效用数据。成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)按3%进行贴现,并进行敏感性分析。

结果

66例患者符合DLS队列的纳入标准(单纯减压35例),最短随访时间为1年(平均1.7年)。DLS队列患者的平均年龄为64.76岁,45例患者(68.2%)为女性。对于每个队列,效用评分从基线到随访均有所改善,且改善幅度在组间无差异。比较手术治疗与非手术治疗的终身ICUR分别为:DLS队列7946加元/QALY,膝关节OA队列7104加元/QALY,髋关节OA队列5098加元/QALY。亚组分析显示,接受减压融合的DLS患者的ICUR(9870加元/QALY)高于单纯减压的DLS患者(5�45加元/QALY)。通过确定性或概率敏感性分析,各组ICUR的排序未发生变化。

结论

DLS的MIS手术终身ICUR与全关节置换术相似。未来的研究应从社会角度进行,并可能捕捉到MIS手术的更多经济效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/72e05f4b513c/064e391f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/5e3993c4b5ea/064e391f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/bdafbccd7c11/064e391f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/3fc928dec481/064e391f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/72e05f4b513c/064e391f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/5e3993c4b5ea/064e391f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/bdafbccd7c11/064e391f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/3fc928dec481/064e391f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/893e/8410474/72e05f4b513c/064e391f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios for minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis relative to failed medical management compared with total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.与骨关节炎全髋关节和膝关节置换术相比,退行性腰椎滑脱症微创手术相对于保守治疗失败的终生增量成本-效用比。
Can J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;64(4):E391-E402. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015719.
2
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
3
Comparison of lifetime incremental cost:utility ratios of surgery relative to failed medical management for the treatment of hip, knee and spine osteoarthritis modelled using 2-year postsurgical values.比较髋关节、膝关节和脊柱骨关节炎治疗中手术相对于失败的医学管理的终生增量成本-效用比:使用术后 2 年的数值进行建模。
Can J Surg. 2012 Jun;55(3):181-90. doi: 10.1503/cjs.033910.
4
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,腰椎局灶性狭窄症的手术治疗的比较结果和成本-效用——第 1 部分:健康相关生活质量的长期变化。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
5
Cost-utility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.有症状退行性腰椎滑脱症患者行减压融合与单纯减压手术的成本-效用分析。
Spine J. 2012 Jan;12(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
6
Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,局灶性症状性脊柱狭窄手术治疗后健康相关生活质量的评估。
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
7
Cost-Utility Analysis of Instrumented Fusion Versus Decompression Alone for Grade I L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis at 1-Year Follow-up: A Pilot Study.I级L4-L5椎体滑脱症行器械融合术与单纯减压术1年随访的成本效用分析:一项初步研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):E80-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000103.
8
Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of surgical treatment for focal (one- to two-level) lumbar spinal stenosis compared with total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.术后健康相关生活质量的改善:对比全膝关节置换术治疗骨关节炎,手术治疗局灶性(1-2 节段)腰椎狭窄症的全国性比较。
Spine J. 2011 Nov;11(11):1033-41. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.10.011.
9
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴下腰痛和下肢痛的两年成本效果分析。
World Neurosurg. 2012 Jul;78(1-2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.013. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
10
Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis With Spondylolisthesis: A Cost Utility Analysis.腰椎减压融合术与非融合术治疗腰椎滑脱伴腰椎狭窄的成本效用分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Jun 15;49(12):847-856. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004928. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of a pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway versus usual care in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.腰椎融合手术患者术前、术中和术后康复路径与常规护理的成本-效用分析
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 26;5:104221. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104221. eCollection 2025.
2
Out-of-hours emergent surgery for degenerative spinal disease in Canada: a retrospective cohort study from a national registry.加拿大退行性脊柱疾病的非工作时间急诊手术:一项来自国家登记处的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jun 11;36:100816. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100816. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Clinical efficacy and psychological improvement in elderly patients with knee arthritis after comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine care.

本文引用的文献

1
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
2
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
3
Breaking Through the "Glass Ceiling" of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.突破微创脊柱手术的“玻璃天花板”。
综合中医护理对老年膝关节炎患者的临床疗效及心理改善情况
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Aug 15;14(8):5491-5500. eCollection 2022.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S39-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001482.
4
Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.腰椎滑脱症后路微创融合术与传统开放融合术的成本效用分析
SAS J. 2011 Jun 1;5(2):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.02.001. eCollection 2011.
5
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.微创后路腰椎融合术的比较结果:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1727-37. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3465-5.
6
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,腰椎局灶性狭窄症的手术治疗的比较结果和成本-效用——第 1 部分:健康相关生活质量的长期变化。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
7
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
8
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jun;14(3):367-72. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0471-6.
9
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症的比较:有效性和成本效用分析。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.041. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
10
Comparison of lifetime incremental cost:utility ratios of surgery relative to failed medical management for the treatment of hip, knee and spine osteoarthritis modelled using 2-year postsurgical values.比较髋关节、膝关节和脊柱骨关节炎治疗中手术相对于失败的医学管理的终生增量成本-效用比:使用术后 2 年的数值进行建模。
Can J Surg. 2012 Jun;55(3):181-90. doi: 10.1503/cjs.033910.