Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Climate Impacts Research Centre, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Oct;27(20):5070-5083. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15767. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
Arctic plants are adapted to climatic variability, but their long-term responses to warming remain unclear. Responses may occur by range shifts, phenological adjustments in growth and reproduction, or both. Here, we compare distribution and phenology of 83 arctic and boreal mountain species, sampled identically in the early 20th (1917-1919) and 21st centuries (2017-2018) from a region of northern Sweden that has warmed significantly. We test two compensatory hypotheses to high-latitude warming-upward shifts in distribution, and earlier or extended growth and reproduction. For distribution, we show dramatic upward migration by 69% of species, averaging 6.1 m per decade, especially boreal woodland taxa whose upward expansion has reduced arctic montane habitat by 30%. Twenty percent of summit species showed distributional shifts but downward, especially moisture-associated snowbed flora. For phenology, we detected wide inter-annual variability in the onset of leafing and flowering in both eras. However, there was no detectable change in growing-season length, relating to two mechanisms. First, plot-level snow melt data starting in 1917 demonstrated that melt date, rather than vernal temperatures, better predicts plant emergence, with snow melt influenced by warmer years having greater snowfall-warmer springs did not always result in earlier emergence because snowbeds can persist longer. Second, the onset of reproductive senescence between eras was similar, even when plant emergence was earlier by a month, possibly due to intensified summer heat stress or hard-wired 'canalization' where senescence occurs regardless of summer temperature. Migrations in this system have possibly buffered arctic species against displacement by boreal expansion and warming, but ongoing temperature increases, woody plant invasion, and a potential lack of flexibility in timing of senescence may foreshadow challenges.
北极植物适应气候变化,但它们对变暖的长期响应仍不清楚。响应可能通过分布范围的变化、生长和繁殖的物候调整或两者同时发生。在这里,我们比较了 83 种北极和北方山地物种的分布和物候,这些物种在瑞典北部一个变暖显著的地区,在 20 世纪 1917-1919 年和 21 世纪 2017-2018 年进行了相同的采样。我们测试了两种补偿性假设,即分布向高纬度变暖方向的向上移动,以及更早或更长的生长和繁殖。对于分布,我们发现 69%的物种显著向上迁移,平均每十年 6.1 米,特别是北方林地物种,其向上扩张使北极山地栖息地减少了 30%。20%的山顶物种表现出分布上的变化,但向下移动,特别是与水分相关的雪床植物。对于物候,我们在两个时期都检测到了叶片和花朵出现的广泛年际变化。然而,生长季节的长度没有发生可检测到的变化,这与两种机制有关。首先,从 1917 年开始的地块级融雪数据表明,融雪日期而不是春季温度更好地预测了植物的出现,由于温暖年份的融雪量更大,融雪时间受影响,温暖的春天并不总是导致更早的出现,因为雪床可能会持续更长时间。其次,两个时期之间生殖衰老的开始时间相似,即使植物的出现早了一个月,这可能是由于夏季热应激加剧,或者由于衰老无论夏季温度如何都会发生而导致的“硬连线”“管化”。这个系统中的迁移可能缓冲了北极物种免受北方扩张和变暖的影响,但持续的温度升高、木本植物入侵以及衰老时间缺乏灵活性可能预示着挑战。