Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0255122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255122. eCollection 2021.
Frailty has been recognized as an independent risk factor for inferior outcomes, but its effect on emergency general surgery (EGS) is understudied.
The purpose of the present study was to define the impact of frailty on risk-adjusted mortality, non-home discharge, and readmission following EGS operations.
Adults undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small bowel resection, large bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, or laparotomy within two days of an urgent admission were identified in the 2016-2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was defined using diagnosis codes corresponding to the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable regression was used to study in-hospital mortality and non-home discharge by operation, and Kaplan Meier analysis to study freedom from unplanned readmission at up to 90-days follow-up.
Among 655,817 patients, 11.9% were considered frail. Frail patients most commonly underwent large bowel resection (37.3%) and cholecystectomy (29.2%). After adjustment, frail patients had higher mortality rates for all operations compared to nonfrail, including those most commonly performed (11.9% [95% CI 11.4-12.5%] vs 6.0% [95% CI 5.8-6.3%] for large bowel resection; 2.3% [95% CI 2.0-2.6%] vs 0.2% [95% CI 0.2-0.2%] for cholecystectomy). Adjusted non-home discharge rates were higher for frail compared to nonfrail patients following all operations, including large bowel resection (68.1% [95% CI 67.1-69.0%] vs 25.9% [95% CI 25.2-26.5%]) and cholecystectomy (33.7% [95% CI 32.7-34.7%] vs 2.9% [95% CI 2.8-3.0%]). Adjusted hospitalization costs were nearly twice as high for frail patients. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, frail patients had greater unplanned readmissions (log rank P<0.001), with 1 in 4 rehospitalized within 90 days.
Frail patients have inferior clinical outcomes and greater resource use following EGS, with the greatest absolute differences following complex operations. Simple frailty assessments may inform expectations, identify patients at risk of poor outcomes, and guide the need for more intensive postoperative care.
衰弱已被认为是预后不良的独立危险因素,但它对急诊普通外科(EGS)的影响仍研究不足。
本研究旨在确定衰弱对 EGS 手术后风险调整死亡率、非出院和再入院的影响。
在 2016-2017 年全国再入院数据库中,确定了在紧急入院后两天内接受阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术、小肠切除术、大肠切除术、穿孔性溃疡修复或剖腹术的成年人。使用与约翰霍普金斯调整临床组衰弱指标相对应的诊断代码来定义衰弱。多变量回归用于研究按手术分类的院内死亡率和非出院,Kaplan-Meier 分析用于研究最多 90 天随访时无计划再入院的自由。
在 655817 名患者中,11.9%被认为虚弱。虚弱的患者最常接受大肠切除术(37.3%)和胆囊切除术(29.2%)。调整后,与非虚弱患者相比,所有手术的虚弱患者死亡率更高,包括最常见的手术(11.9%[95%CI 11.4-12.5%]比大肠切除术的 6.0%[95%CI 5.8-6.3%];2.3%[95%CI 2.0-2.6%]比胆囊切除术的 0.2%[95%CI 0.2-0.2%])。与非虚弱患者相比,所有手术后虚弱患者的非出院率更高,包括大肠切除术(68.1%[95%CI 67.1-69.0%]比 25.9%[95%CI 25.2-26.5%])和胆囊切除术(33.7%[95%CI 32.7-34.7%]比 2.9%[95%CI 2.8-3.0%])。虚弱患者的住院费用几乎是虚弱患者的两倍。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,虚弱患者的无计划再入院率更高(对数秩 P<0.001),其中 1/4 名患者在 90 天内再次住院。
虚弱患者在接受 EGS 后临床结局较差,资源利用率较高,复杂手术后的绝对差异最大。简单的衰弱评估可以提供预期,识别预后不良的患者,并指导需要更密集的术后护理。