Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 8;17(11):e0276917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276917. eCollection 2022.
With limited national studies available, we characterized the association of frailty with outcomes of surgical resection for colonic volvulus.
Adults with sigmoid or cecal volvulus undergoing non-elective colectomy were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was identified using the Johns Hopkins indicator which utilizes administrative codes. Multivariable models were developed to examine the association of frailty with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, stoma use, length of stay, hospitalization costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day non-elective readmissions.
An estimated 66,767 patients underwent resection for colonic volvulus (Sigmoid: 39.6%; Cecal: 60.4%). Using the Johns Hopkins indicator, 30.3% of patients with sigmoid volvulus and 15.9% of those with cecal volvulus were considered frail. After adjustment, frail patients had higher risk of mortality compared to non-frail in both sigmoid (10.6% [95% CI 9.47-11.7] vs 5.7% [95% CI 5.2-6.2]) and cecal (10.4% [95% CI 9.2-11.6] vs 3.5% [95% CI 3.2-3.8]) volvulus cohorts. Frailty was associated with greater odds of acute venous thromboembolism occurrences (Sigmoid: AOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.18-1.94]; Cecal: AOR 2.0 [95% CI 1.50-2.72]), colostomy formation (Sigmoid: AOR 1.73 [95% CI 1.57-1.91]; Cecal: AOR 1.48 [95% CI 1.10-2.00]), non-home discharge (Sigmoid: AOR 1.97 [95% CI 1.77-2.20]; Cecal: AOR 2.56 [95% CI 2.27-2.89]), and 30-day readmission (Sigmoid: AOR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01-1.30]; Cecal: AOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.10-1.45]). Frailty was associated with incremental increase in length of stay (Sigmoid: +3.4 days [95% CI 2.8-3.9]; Cecal: +3.8 days [95% CI 3.3-4.4]) and costs (Sigmoid: +$7.5k [95% CI 5.9-9.1]; Cecal: +$12.1k [95% CI 10.1-14.1]).
Frailty, measured using a simplified administrative tool, is associated with significantly worse clinical and financial outcomes following non-elective resections for colonic volvulus. Standard assessment of frailty may aid risk-stratification, better inform shared-decision making, and guide healthcare teams in targeted resource allocation in this vulnerable patient population.
由于国家研究有限,我们描述了虚弱与结肠扭转手术切除结果的关系。
在 2010-2019 年全国再入院数据库中,确定了接受非择期结肠切除术的乙状结肠或盲肠扭转的成年人。使用约翰霍普金斯指标(利用行政代码)来确定虚弱。开发多变量模型来检查虚弱与院内死亡率、围手术期并发症、造口术使用、住院时间、住院费用、非家庭出院和 30 天非择期再入院之间的关系。
估计有 66767 名患者接受了结肠扭转切除术(乙状结肠:39.6%;盲肠:60.4%)。使用约翰霍普金斯指标,30.3%的乙状结肠扭转患者和 15.9%的盲肠扭转患者被认为虚弱。调整后,虚弱患者的死亡率明显高于非虚弱患者,无论是在乙状结肠(10.6%[95%CI9.47-11.7]比 5.7%[95%CI5.2-6.2])还是盲肠(10.4%[95%CI9.2-11.6]比 3.5%[95%CI3.2-3.8])。虚弱与急性静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生几率较高相关(乙状结肠:AOR1.50[95%CI1.18-1.94];盲肠:AOR2.0[95%CI1.50-2.72])、结肠造口术(乙状结肠:AOR1.73[95%CI1.57-1.91];盲肠:AOR1.48[95%CI1.10-2.00])、非家庭出院(乙状结肠:AOR1.97[95%CI1.77-2.20];盲肠:AOR2.56[95%CI2.27-2.89])和 30 天再入院(乙状结肠:AOR1.15[95%CI1.01-1.30];盲肠:AOR1.26[95%CI1.10-1.45])。虚弱与住院时间的延长(乙状结肠:+3.4 天[95%CI2.8-3.9];盲肠:+3.8 天[95%CI3.3-4.4])和成本(乙状结肠:+7.5k[95%CI5.9-9.1];盲肠:+12.1k[95%CI10.1-14.1])的增加相关。
使用简化的行政工具测量的虚弱与结肠扭转非择期切除后的临床和财务结果显著恶化有关。虚弱的标准评估可能有助于风险分层,更好地为共同决策提供信息,并指导医疗保健团队在这个脆弱的患者群体中进行有针对性的资源分配。