Høilund-Carlsen P F, Marving J, Rasmussen S, Gadsbøll N, Chraemmer-Jørgensen B, Lauritzen S L
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Card Imaging. 1987;2(3):183-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01784306.
Confidence limits for single and repeat measurements of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were established by means of a model based on the statistical method of variance components. A total of 80 subjects (age 23 to 74 years) were examined by two radionuclide methods 1) gated first-pass (fp) technique performed in a standard 30 degrees right anterior oblique projection, and 2) multigated equilibrium imaging (muga) in an individual left anterior oblique view, applying with both methods separate end-diastolic and end-systolic ventricular regions of interest. Values obtained by fp technique were clearly higher than those measured by the muga approach, and the correlation between them was only fair: RVEFmuga = 0.48 RVEFfp + 0.13; r = 0.73; SEE = 0.08. The 95% confidence limits for a single measurement were with the fp technique: 'true' RVEF = measured RVEF +/- 6 EF-units compared to +/- 16 units with the muga method. At repeat determination within an interval of four weeks, the minimal changes in measured RVEF that were statistically significant at the 5% level were with the fp technique +/- 8 units with the same observer on both occasions and +/- 9 units with different observers. Corresponding figures with the muga method were +/- 16 and +/- 22 units, respectively. The minimal changes in a subject's 'true' RVEF necessary to produce a significant change in measured RVEF were with fp technique +/- 14 units for the same observer and +/- 17 units for different observers, compared to +/- 30 and +/- 41 units with the muga method. In conclusion, the variability with the muga approach was far greater than with the fp technique and the consequent reproducibility so poor as to preclude meaningful measurement of RVEF by the muga method.
通过基于方差成分统计方法的模型,确定了右心室射血分数(RVEF)单次和重复测量的置信区间。共有80名受试者(年龄23至74岁)接受了两种放射性核素方法的检查:1)在标准的右前斜30度投影中进行的门控首次通过(fp)技术,以及2)在个体左前斜视图中进行的多门控平衡成像(muga),两种方法均应用舒张末期和收缩末期心室感兴趣区。fp技术获得的值明显高于muga方法测量的值,两者之间的相关性一般:RVEFmuga = 0.48 RVEFfp + 0.13;r = 0.73;SEE = 0.08。fp技术单次测量的95%置信区间为:“真实”RVEF = 测量的RVEF ± 6个EF单位,而muga方法为 ± 16个单位。在四周的间隔内进行重复测定时,在5%水平上具有统计学意义的测量RVEF的最小变化,对于fp技术,同一观察者两次测量为 ± 8个单位,不同观察者测量为 ± 9个单位。muga方法的相应数字分别为 ± 16和 ± 22个单位。对于同一观察者,使测量的RVEF产生显著变化所需的受试者“真实”RVEF的最小变化,fp技术为 ± 14个单位,不同观察者为 ± 17个单位,而muga方法为 ± 30和 ± 41个单位。总之,muga方法的变异性远大于fp技术,其再现性很差,以至于无法通过muga方法进行有意义的RVEF测量。