• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种射频消融技术治疗膝骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of Efficacy among Three Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.

Orthopaedic Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;18(14):7424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147424.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147424
PMID:34299875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8306337/
Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was first introduced for treating knee osteoarthritis (OA) in 2010 and has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option. Three RFA techniques have been adopted for treating knee OA, including conventional, pulsed, and cooled RFA. However, the efficacy among different RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA is still unclear. Three electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant articles, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of articles that investigated the use of RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA was conducted to pool the effect size in pain before and after treatment. A total of 20 eligible articles (including 605 patients) were included for our meta-analysis. After treatment, the patients had significant improvements in pain for all three RFA techniques when compared with the baseline level for the 1, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups ( < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in the efficacy among the three RFA techniques for all follow-up visits ( > 0.05). The three RFA techniques demonstrated a significant improvement in pain for up to 6 months after treatment. Comparing the efficacy of the three RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA, our results showed that no significant differences in pain relief among the three RFA techniques were observed at the 1-, 3-, 6, and 12-month follow-up visits.

摘要

射频消融术(RFA)于 2010 年首次被引入膝骨关节炎(OA)的治疗,已成为一种微创治疗选择。目前有三种 RFA 技术被用于治疗膝骨关节炎,包括常规、脉冲和冷却 RFA。然而,不同 RFA 技术在膝骨关节炎治疗中的疗效仍不清楚。我们系统地检索了三个电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library,以查找有关 RFA 技术治疗膝骨关节炎的相关文章。对研究 RFA 技术治疗膝骨关节炎的文章进行荟萃分析,以汇总治疗前后疼痛的效应量。共有 20 篇符合条件的文章(包括 605 名患者)被纳入荟萃分析。与治疗前相比,所有三种 RFA 技术在治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月的随访中疼痛均有显著改善(<0.00001)。然而,在所有随访中,三种 RFA 技术的疗效之间没有显著差异(>0.05)。三种 RFA 技术在治疗后长达 6 个月内均显示出疼痛显著改善。比较三种 RFA 技术治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效,我们的结果表明,在 1、3、6 和 12 个月的随访中,三种 RFA 技术在缓解疼痛方面没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/10818cc91932/ijerph-18-07424-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/7fb0448641eb/ijerph-18-07424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/a64d8e826593/ijerph-18-07424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/6dff7bcf5747/ijerph-18-07424-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/9122b89b4790/ijerph-18-07424-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/10818cc91932/ijerph-18-07424-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/7fb0448641eb/ijerph-18-07424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/a64d8e826593/ijerph-18-07424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/6dff7bcf5747/ijerph-18-07424-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/9122b89b4790/ijerph-18-07424-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcea/8306337/10818cc91932/ijerph-18-07424-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Efficacy among Three Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.三种射频消融技术治疗膝骨关节炎疗效比较的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;18(14):7424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147424.
2
The Analgesic Effectiveness of Genicular Nerve-targeted Cooled and Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节内神经靶向冷却脉冲射频消融治疗膝骨关节炎疼痛的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):357-373.
3
Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.射频消融在冷单极或传统双极模式下与其他治疗膝关节骨关节炎的方法相比,能带来更有益的短期临床结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jul;38(7):2287-2302. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.048. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
4
Radiofrequency ablation reduces pain for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.射频消融术可减轻膝骨关节炎疼痛:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2021 Jul;91:105951. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105951. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
5
Effectiveness of the Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Patients with Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study.冷却射频关节突神经消融术治疗膝骨关节炎慢性膝痛的疗效:一项双盲、随机、对照研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 24;60(6):857. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060857.
6
A Review of Long-Term Pain Relief after Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis.膝状神经射频消融术治疗慢性膝骨关节炎后的长期疼痛缓解情况综述
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E437-E444.
7
Thermal Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Nonsurgical Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review.热神经射频消融术治疗膝骨关节炎的非手术治疗:系统文献回顾。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 May 1;29(9):387-396. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00522.
8
A comparison of efficacy among different radiofrequency ablation techniques for the treatment of lumbar facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同射频消融技术治疗腰椎小关节和骶髂关节疼痛的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105854. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105854. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
9
Safety and efficacy comparison of three- vs four-needle technique in the management of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee using cooled radiofrequency ablation.使用冷却射频消融术治疗中度至重度膝骨关节炎时三针与四针技术的安全性和疗效比较
Skeletal Radiol. 2021 Apr;50(4):739-750. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03619-1. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
Comparative Effectiveness Review of Cooled Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.冷却与脉冲射频消融治疗膝关节骨关节炎的比较有效性评价:一项系统评价
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):155-171.

引用本文的文献

1
Genicular Nerve Block Versus Genicular Nerve Ablation for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Retrospective Studies.膝骨关节炎的膝神经阻滞与膝神经消融:随机对照试验和回顾性研究的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):e79106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79106. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Algofunctional outcome after intra-articular bipolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation for pain in osteoarthritis of the knee: A retrospective study.关节内双极脉冲射频消融治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的algofunctional 结局:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 15;103(46):e40504. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040504.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效Meta 分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 May;44(5):877-884. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04489-x. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection: efficacy of hyaluronic acid compared to glucocorticoid in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.超声引导下关节内注射:透明质酸与糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效比较。
Minerva Med. 2019 Dec;110(6):515-523. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06190-1.
3
Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
A retrospective assessment of the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chronic pain caused by advanced knee osteoarthritis.
回顾性评估脉冲射频消融治疗晚期膝骨关节炎引起的慢性疼痛的有效性。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(2):151-159. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.139860.
4
An update on radiofrequency denervation for arthritis-related knee joint pain: a synthesis of the current evidence.射频去神经术治疗关节炎相关膝关节疼痛的最新进展:当前证据的综合分析
BJA Educ. 2024 May;24(5):164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Cryoablation Compared with Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves in Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Study Protocol of Single-Centric, Assessor-Blinded, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Non-inferiority Study.比较膝关节晚期骨关节炎下关节内神经冷冻消融与冷却射频消融的疗效和安全性:一项单中心、评估者盲法、随机、平行组、非劣效性研究方案。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Apr;47(4):508-514. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03703-2. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
6
Cooled Radiofrequency Treatment for Radicular Pain Related to Lumbar Disc Herniation.低温射频治疗与腰椎间盘突出症相关的神经根性疼痛
Cureus. 2023 Sep 30;15(9):e46255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46255. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Can ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of the knee, be performed without locating corresponding arterial pulsations-a cadaveric study.膝关节神经射频消融术是否可以在不定位相应动脉搏动的情况下进行——尸体研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 16;24(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06761-8.
8
Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS).比较常规和冷却射频治疗膝关节神经与假手术治疗慢性膝关节疼痛患者的疗效:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验(COGENIUS)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 2;13(8):e073949. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073949.
9
Facet Joint Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.小关节综合征:病理生理学、诊断与治疗
J Pain Res. 2022 Nov 30;15:3689-3710. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S389602. eCollection 2022.
10
Pulsed Radiofrequency Rhizotomy of the Genicular Nerves of the Knee Guided by Radioscopy and Ultrasonography: Step-By-Step Technique.在透视和超声引导下对膝关节膝神经进行脉冲射频神经根切断术:分步技术
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Feb 18;11(3):e391-e396. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.11.006. eCollection 2022 Mar.
单次与多次注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Dec 16;7(12):2325967119887116. doi: 10.1177/2325967119887116. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
The effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.足部矫形器治疗膝内侧骨关节炎的疗效:系统评价。
Gait Posture. 2020 Feb;76:238-251. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Results of genicular nerve ablation by radiofrequency in osteoarthritis-related chronic refractory knee pain.射频关节支神经消融术治疗骨关节炎相关慢性难治性膝关节痛的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Feb 13;50(1):86-95. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-91.
6
Effectiveness of Denervation Therapy on Pain and Joint Function for Patients with Refractory Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.去神经治疗对难治性膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和关节功能的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Jul;22(4):341-352.
7
Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data.基于试验数据的膝关节骨关节炎慢性疼痛行关节神经冷却射频消融术的成本效果分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jun 26;20(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2.
8
A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound- vs Fluoroscopy-Guided Genicular Nerve Block for Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis.超声与透视引导下膝关节神经阻滞治疗慢性膝骨关节炎的前瞻性随机比较
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):139-146.
9
The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency of Genicular Nerves in the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Severe Degenerative Disease or Previous Total Knee Arthroplasty.超声引导下膝关节神经脉冲射频治疗严重退行性疾病或既往全膝关节置换术后慢性膝关节疼痛的疗效。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Mar 12;25:1857-1863. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915359.
10
Twelve-month analgesia and rescue, by cooled radiofrequency ablation treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain: results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, cross-over trial.通过冷却射频消融术治疗骨关节炎性膝关节疼痛的十二个月镇痛及补救效果:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、交叉试验的结果
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 16. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100051.