Department of Geoscience & Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Department of Systems Analysis, University of Economics, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;18(14):7517. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147517.
Health behaviour among young people has a social gradient, and tends to be skewed in terms of gender as well. Young men in vocational educational settings are an example where the inequality in health is apparent. Addressing this problem requires an understanding of health behaviour and its determinants in the target group in order to be able to develop interventions that can address the problem. The aim of the paper is to investigate to what extent a multicomponent intervention based on the Whole School Approach, targeting the risk behaviours, smoking, eating and physical activity that have an impact on health behaviour among male students in a disadvantaged educational setting. The paper uses self-reported longitudinal data on risk behaviours from the "Gearing up the Body" 1-year intervention program that was implemented among students at a Danish vocational school. For the analysis, we created a score model to categorise students and behaviour. Analyses suggest that interventions had only a modest impact and what evidence there is shows that the interventions reduced the health behaviour scores by 0.03 points. More specifically, we find that symbolic violence reduces the health behaviour score of the healthy types by 0.20 points, whereas soft power increases the health behaviour of the unhealthy type by 0.05 points. An explanation for the disappointing results of the "Gearing up the Body" program is tension between different understanding of what is "right" and "wrong" health behaviour. We find that the ideas of soft power and symbolic violence can contribute to a better understanding of why health and health behaviour is understood differently among vocational students. Thus, the finding demonstrates that one needs to apply a participatory approach rather than a normative approach addressing the health behaviour of disadvantaged individuals.
年轻人的健康行为存在社会梯度差异,而且往往存在性别偏差。职业教育背景下的年轻男性就是一个明显存在健康不平等的例子。解决这个问题需要了解目标群体的健康行为及其决定因素,以便能够制定出能够解决问题的干预措施。本文旨在探讨基于全纳学校模式的多组分干预措施在多大程度上能够针对影响劣势教育环境中男学生健康行为的风险行为、吸烟、饮食和体育活动,从而改变这些男学生的健康行为。本文使用了丹麦一所职业学校学生参与为期一年的“准备好身体”风险行为自我报告纵向数据。为了进行分析,我们创建了一个评分模型来对学生和行为进行分类。分析表明,干预措施的影响有限,现有证据表明,干预措施将健康行为评分降低了 0.03 分。更具体地说,我们发现象征性暴力将健康型学生的健康行为评分降低了 0.20 分,而软实力则将不健康型学生的健康行为提高了 0.05 分。“准备好身体”计划令人失望的结果的一个解释是,对于什么是“正确”和“错误”的健康行为存在不同的理解之间存在紧张关系。我们发现,软实力和象征性暴力的理念有助于更好地理解为什么职业学生对健康和健康行为的理解不同。因此,这一发现表明,需要采用参与式方法,而不是规范性方法来解决弱势群体的健康行为问题。