Appaneal Haley J, Shireman Theresa I, Lopes Vrishali V, Mor Vincent, Dosa David M, LaPlante Kerry L, Caffrey Aisling R
Infectious Diseases Research Program, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Ave, Providence, RI, 02908, USA.
Center of Innovation in Long-Term Support Services, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02378-5.
Antibiotic use is associated with several antibiotic-related harms in vulnerable, older long-term care (LTC) residents. Suboptimal antibiotic use may also be associated with harms but has not yet been investigated. The aim of this work was to compare rates of poor clinical outcomes among LTC residents with UTI receiving suboptimal versus optimal antibiotic treatment.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study among residents with an incident urinary tract infection (UTI) treated in Veterans Affairs LTC units (2013-2018). Potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was defined as use of a suboptimal initial antibiotic drug choice, dose frequency, and/or excessive treatment duration. The primary outcome was time to a composite measure of poor clinical outcome, defined as UTI recurrence, acute care hospitalization/emergency department visit, adverse drug event, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), or death within 30 days of antibiotic discontinuation. Shared frailty Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the time-to-event between suboptimal and optimal treatment.
Among 19,701 LTC residents with an incident UTI, 64.6% received potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment and 35.4% experienced a poor clinical outcome. In adjusted analyses, potentially suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a small increased hazard of poor clinical outcome (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) as compared with optimal treatment, driven by an increased hazard of CDI (aHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.54-2.44).
In this national cohort study, suboptimal antibiotic treatment was associated with a 6% increased risk of the composite measure of poor clinical outcomes, in particular, a 94% increased risk of CDI. Beyond the decision to use antibiotics, clinicians should also consider the potential harms of suboptimal treatment choices with regards to drug type, dose frequency, and duration used.
在脆弱的老年长期护理(LTC)居民中,抗生素的使用与多种抗生素相关危害有关。抗生素使用不当也可能与危害相关,但尚未得到研究。这项工作的目的是比较接受不当与最佳抗生素治疗的LTC居民尿路感染(UTI)的不良临床结局发生率。
我们对在退伍军人事务LTC单位接受治疗的新发尿路感染(UTI)居民进行了一项回顾性队列研究(2013 - 2018年)。潜在的不当抗生素治疗定义为使用不当的初始抗生素药物选择、剂量频率和/或过长的治疗持续时间。主要结局是不良临床结局综合指标的发生时间,定义为UTI复发、急性护理住院/急诊科就诊、药物不良事件、艰难梭菌感染(CDI)或抗生素停用后30天内死亡。采用共享脆弱性Cox比例风险回归模型比较不当治疗与最佳治疗之间的事件发生时间。
在19,701例新发UTI的LTC居民中,64.6%接受了潜在的不当抗生素治疗,35.4%出现了不良临床结局。在调整分析中,与最佳治疗相比,潜在的不当抗生素治疗与不良临床结局的风险略有增加相关(调整后风险比[aHR] 1.06,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01 - 1.11),这是由CDI风险增加所驱动的(aHR 1.94,95% CI 1.54 - 2.44)。
在这项全国性队列研究中,不当抗生素治疗与不良临床结局综合指标的风险增加6%相关,特别是CDI风险增加94%。除了使用抗生素的决策外,临床医生还应考虑在药物类型、剂量频率和使用持续时间方面不当治疗选择的潜在危害。