Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Nishinomiya Municipal Hospital, 8-24 Hayashida-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8014, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 23;11(1):15119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94596-5.
To investigate the prevalence of nodular pulmonary ossifications (POs) in patients with honeycombing on ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) and to compare the detectability of nodular POs between images reconstructed using the ultra-high-resolution setting (UHR-setting) and those using the conventional setting (C-setting) on UHRCT. Twenty patients with honeycombing in the lung were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent non-contrast-enhanced UHRCT. Images were reconstructed with UHR-setting (matrix, 2048 × 2048; slice thickness, 0.25 mm) and with C-setting (matrix size, 512 × 512; slice thickness, 0.5 mm). Two chest radiologists independently recorded the number of nodular POs (< 4 mm diameter) in each lung lobes. Each lobe was classified as one of the following five categories according to the number of POs: C0, none; C1, 1-4 POs; C2, 5-9 POs; C3, 10-49 POs; and C4, ≥ 50 POs. The maximum CT values of the POs were measured and compared between the two settings. PO categories were significantly higher with UHR-setting than with C-setting (p < 0.001). Maximum CT values were significantly higher with UHR-setting than with C-setting (p < 0.001). Nodular POs were seen in 80% or more of patients with honeycombing and more easily detected in images reconstructed with UHR-setting than in those with C-setting.
调查超高分辨率 CT(UHRCT)中蜂巢样改变患者肺内结节状骨化灶(POs)的发生率,并比较 UHRCT 超高分辨率重建(UHR-setting)与常规重建(C-setting)图像上 POs 的检出率。
回顾性分析 20 例肺蜂巢样改变患者。所有患者均行非增强 UHRCT 检查。采用 UHR-setting(矩阵 2048×2048,层厚 0.25mm)和 C-setting(矩阵大小 512×512,层厚 0.5mm)进行图像重建。两名胸部放射科医师独立记录每侧肺各肺叶的结节状 POs(<4mm 直径)数量。根据 POs 数量,将每个肺叶分为以下 5 个类别之一:C0,无;C1,1-4 个 POs;C2,5-9 个 POs;C3,10-49 个 POs;C4,≥50 个 POs。测量 POs 的最大 CT 值,并比较两种重建方法之间的差异。
与 C-setting 相比,UHR-setting 下 PO 分类明显更高(p<0.001)。UHR-setting 下的最大 CT 值明显高于 C-setting(p<0.001)。在 80%以上的蜂巢样改变患者中可见结节状 POs,且 UHR-setting 重建图像较 C-setting 重建图像更容易检出。
在 UHRCT 中,结节状 POs 在蜂巢样改变患者中较为常见,UHR-setting 重建图像较 C-setting 重建图像更易检出。