Suppr超能文献

自动化交替遮盖试验用于“HINTS”评估:一项验证研究。

Automated alternate cover test for 'HINTS' assessment: a validation study.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;279(6):2873-2879. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06998-w. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The alternate cover test (ACT) in patients with acute vestibular syndrome is part of the 'HINTS' battery test. Although quantitative, the ACT is highly dependent on the examiner's experience and could theoretically vary greatly between examiners. In this study, we sought to validate an automated video-oculography (VOG) system based on eye tracking and dedicated glasses.

METHODS

We artificially induced a vertical strabismus to simulate a skew deviation on ten healthy subjects, aged from 26 to 66, using different press-on Fresnel prisms on one eye while recording eye position with VOG of the contralateral eye. We then compared the system's performance to that of a blinded trained orthoptist using conventional, semi-quantitative method of skew measurement known as the alternate prism cover test (APCT) as a gold standard.

RESULTS

We found a significant correlation between the reference APCT and the Skew VOG (Pearson's R = 0.606, p < 0.05). There was a good agreement between the two tests (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.852, 95 CI 0.728-0.917, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the VOG was estimated at 80.53% with an error rate of 19.46%. There was no significant difference in VOG skew estimations compared with the gold standard except for very small skews.

CONCLUSIONS

VOG offers an objective and quantitative skew measurement and proved to be accurate in measuring vertical eye misalignment compared to the ACT with prisms. Precision was moderate, which mandates a sufficient number of tests per subject.

摘要

目的

急性前庭综合征患者的交替遮盖试验(ACT)是“HINTS”电池测试的一部分。虽然是定量的,但 ACT 高度依赖于检查者的经验,并且理论上在不同的检查者之间可能会有很大的差异。在这项研究中,我们试图验证一种基于眼球追踪和专用眼镜的自动视频眼动描记术(VOG)系统。

方法

我们在 10 名年龄在 26 至 66 岁的健康受试者中,通过在一只眼睛上使用不同的压贴式菲涅耳棱镜来人为诱导垂直斜视,以模拟斜视偏差,同时记录对侧眼睛的 VOG 眼位。然后,我们将系统的性能与一位经过训练的、使用传统半定量斜视测量方法(称为交替棱镜遮盖试验(APCT))的盲视验光师进行比较,APCT 作为金标准。

结果

我们发现参考 APCT 与 VOG 斜视(Pearson's R = 0.606,p < 0.05)之间存在显著相关性。两种测试之间具有良好的一致性(组内相关系数 0.852,95%置信区间 0.728-0.917,p < 0.001)。VOG 的总体准确性估计为 80.53%,误差率为 19.46%。除了非常小的斜视偏差外,VOG 的斜视估计与金标准相比没有显著差异。

结论

VOG 提供了一种客观和定量的斜视测量方法,与使用棱镜的 ACT 相比,证明在测量垂直眼位偏斜方面是准确的。精度为中等,这要求每个受试者进行足够数量的测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbec/9072275/7020c097e854/405_2021_6998_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验