Korda Athanasia, Wimmer Wilhelm, Zamaro Ewa, Wagner Franca, Sauter Thomas C, Caversaccio Marco D, Mantokoudis Georgios
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 12;13:920357. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.920357. eCollection 2022.
A three-step bedside test ("HINTS": Head Impulse-Nystagmus-Test of Skew), is a well-established way to differentiate peripheral from central causes in patients with acute vestibular syndrome (AVS). Nowadays, the use of videooculography gives physicians the possibility to quantify all eye movements. The goal of this study is to compare the accuracy of VOG "HINTS" (vHINTS) to an expert evaluation.
We performed a prospective study from July 2015 to April 2020 on all patients presenting at the emergency department with signs of AVS. All the patients underwent clinical HINTS (cHINTS) and vHINTS followed by delayed MRI, which served as a gold standard for stroke confirmation.
We assessed 46 patients with AVS, 35 patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy, and 11 patients with stroke. The overall accuracy of vHINTS in detecting a central pathology was 94.2% with 100% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity. Experts, however, assessed cHINTS with a lower accuracy of 88.3%, 90.9% sensitivity, and 85.7% specificity. The agreement between clinical and video head impulse tests was good, whereas for nystagmus direction was fair.
vHINTS proved to be very accurate in detecting strokes in patients AVS, with 9% points better sensitivity than the expert. The evaluation of nystagmus direction was the most difficult part of HINTS.
一种三步床旁检查(“HINTS”:头部脉冲-眼震-斜倾试验)是区分急性前庭综合征(AVS)患者外周性与中枢性病因的成熟方法。如今,视频眼震图的应用使医生能够量化所有眼动。本研究的目的是比较视频眼震图“HINTS”(vHINTS)与专家评估的准确性。
我们于2015年7月至2020年4月对所有因AVS症状就诊于急诊科的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。所有患者均接受了临床HINTS(cHINTS)和vHINTS检查,随后进行延迟MRI检查,MRI作为卒中确诊的金标准。
我们评估了46例AVS患者,35例急性单侧前庭病患者和11例卒中患者。vHINTS检测中枢性病变的总体准确率为94.2%,敏感性为100%,特异性为88.9%。然而,专家评估cHINTS的准确性较低,为88.3%,敏感性为90.9%,特异性为85.7%。临床和视频头部脉冲试验之间的一致性良好,而眼震方向的一致性一般。
vHINTS在检测AVS患者的卒中方面非常准确,敏感性比专家评估高9个百分点。眼震方向的评估是HINTS中最困难的部分。