Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UcL Namur, Site Godinne, Avenue Dr G. Therasse, 1, 5530, Yvoir, Belgium.
Laboratory of Microengineering and Bioinstrumentation, HEPIA - University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO Geneva), Geneva, Switzerland.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2022 Aug;36(4):1131-1137. doi: 10.1007/s10877-021-00745-6. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
A more sensitive method than the train-of-four ratio seems required to detect low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade before tracheal extubation. The goal of the study was to determine the potential benefit of 5 s of 100 versus 200 Hz tetanic stimulation to quantify the residual block with mechanomyography in anesthetised patients. Twenty informed and consenting 18- to 80-year-old patients undergoing nose surgery were included. On the left hand, neuromuscular transmission was continuously monitored by acceleromyography. On the right side, a new mecanomyographic device (Isometric Thumb Force) recorded the force of thumb adduction (N) developed during 5 s of 100- and 200 Hz tetanic stimulations of the ulnar nerve at three consecutive times: baseline before inducing the neuromuscular blockade, at the time of contralateral train-of-four ratio 0.9 recovery, and 3 min after additional sugammadex reversal. Tetanic Fade Ratios (TFR = F residual/F max) were compared between 100 and 200 Hz stimulations using Student's t test. At the time of TOF ratio 0.9 recovery, both 100 and 200 Hz TFR were significantly decreased compared to baseline (0.61 and 0.16 on average, respectively, p < 0.0001). The 200 Hz TFR was significantly lower than the 100 Hz TFR (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between baseline and post-reversal TFR. The 200 Hz TFR has the potential to better describe low levels of residual neuromuscular blockade than the TOF ratio and 100 Hz TFR and would benefit from further investigations. Retrospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000273189.
一种比四串比更敏感的方法似乎需要在气管拔管前检测到低水平的残余神经肌肉阻滞。该研究的目的是确定使用肌电图描记术在麻醉患者中定量评估残余阻滞时,100Hz 和 200Hz 强直刺激 5 秒的潜在益处。纳入了 20 名知情并同意的 18 至 80 岁接受鼻手术的患者。在左手,通过加速度描记术连续监测神经肌肉传递。在右手,一种新的肌电图描记设备(等长拇指力)记录了在连续 3 次记录时,尺神经 100Hz 和 200Hz 强直刺激 5 秒时拇指内收的力(N):在诱导神经肌肉阻滞之前的基线、对侧四串比 0.9 恢复时和 3 分钟后额外使用 sugammadex 逆转时。使用学生 t 检验比较 100Hz 和 200Hz 强直刺激的强直消退比(TFR= F 残余/F 最大)。在 TOF 比值 0.9 恢复时,与基线相比,100Hz 和 200Hz 的 TFR 均显著降低(平均分别为 0.61 和 0.16,p<0.0001)。200Hz 的 TFR 明显低于 100Hz 的 TFR(p<0.0001)。基线和逆转后 TFR 之间无差异。200Hz 的 TFR 比 TOF 比值和 100Hz 的 TFR 更能描述低水平的残余神经肌肉阻滞,值得进一步研究。在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12619000273189)进行了回顾性注册。