Orofacial Pain and TMD Unit, University Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Otto Von Guericke University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 24;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01687-w.
In terms of diagnostic and therapeutic management, clinicians should adequately address the frequent aspects of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA) associated with disk displacement. Condylar erosion (CE) is considered an inflammatory subset of OA and is regarded as a sign of progressive OA changes potentially contributing to changes in dentofacial morphology or limited mandibular growth. The purpose of this study was to establish a risk prediction model of CE by a multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict the individual risk of CE in TMJ arthralgia. It was hypothesized that there was a closer association between CE and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicators.
This retrospective paired-design study enrolled 124 consecutive TMJ pain patients and analyzed the clinical and TMJ-related MRI data in predicting CE. TMJ pain patients were categorized according to the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I protocol. Each patient underwent MRI examination of both TMJs, 1-7 days following clinical examination.
In the univariate analysis analyses, 9 influencing factors were related to CE, of which the following 4 as predictors determined the binary multivariate logistic regression model: missing posterior teeth (odds ratio [OR] = 1.42; P = 0.018), RDC/TMD of arthralgia coexistant with disk displacement without reduction with limited opening (DDwoR/wLO) (OR = 3.30, P = 0.007), MRI finding of disk displacement without reduction (OR = 10.96, P < 0.001), and MRI finding of bone marrow edema (OR = 11.97, P < 0.001). The model had statistical significance (chi-square = 148.239, Nagelkerke R square = 0.612, P < 0.001). Out of the TMJs, 83.9% were correctly predicted to be CE cases or Non-CE cases with a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 85.2%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.916.
The established prediction model using the risk factors of TMJ arthralgia may be useful for predicting the risk of CE. The data suggest MRI indicators as dominant factors in the definition of CE. Further research is needed to improve the model, and confirm the validity and reliability of the model.
在诊断和治疗管理方面,临床医生应充分解决与颞下颌关节(TMJ)骨关节炎(OA)相关的常见盘移位问题。髁突侵蚀(CE)被认为是 OA 的炎症亚组,被认为是潜在导致牙颌面形态变化或下颌生长受限的进行性 OA 变化的标志。本研究的目的是通过多变量逻辑回归分析建立 CE 的风险预测模型,以预测 TMJ 关节痛患者中 CE 的个体风险。假设 CE 与磁共振成像(MRI)指标之间存在更密切的关联。
这是一项回顾性配对设计研究,共纳入 124 例连续的 TMJ 疼痛患者,分析了预测 CE 的临床和 TMJ 相关 MRI 数据。TMJ 疼痛患者根据颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)I 轴协议进行分类。每位患者在临床检查后 1-7 天接受双侧 TMJ 的 MRI 检查。
在单因素分析中,有 9 个影响因素与 CE 相关,其中以下 4 个因素作为预测因子确定了二元多变量逻辑回归模型:缺失后牙(比值比 [OR] = 1.42;P = 0.018)、伴髁突不可复性盘前移位但开口受限的 RDC/TMD (DDwoR/wLO)(OR = 3.30,P = 0.007)、MRI 显示不可复性盘前移位(OR = 10.96,P < 0.001)和 MRI 显示骨髓水肿(OR = 11.97,P < 0.001)。该模型具有统计学意义(卡方 = 148.239,Nagelkerke R 平方 = 0.612,P < 0.001)。83.9%的 TMJ 被正确预测为 CE 或非 CE 病例,敏感性为 81.4%,特异性为 85.2%。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.916。
使用 TMJ 关节痛的危险因素建立的预测模型可能有助于预测 CE 的风险。数据表明 MRI 指标是 CE 定义的主要因素。需要进一步研究以改进该模型,并验证该模型的有效性和可靠性。