Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering Group (STEN), Coupure Links 653, Ghent, Belgium; Eurecat, Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya, Waste, Energy and Environmental Impact Unit, 08243 Manresa, Spain.
Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering Group (STEN), Coupure Links 653, Ghent, Belgium.
Waste Manag. 2021 Aug 1;132:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
This study focuses on a comprehensive sustainability assessment of the management of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in Ghent (Belgium), Hamburg (Germany) and Pécs (Hungary). A sustainability assessment framework has been applied to analyse social, environmental, and economic consequences at the midpoint level (25 impact categories) and at the endpoint level (5 areas-of-protection). For each case study, the reference scenario was analysed, along with three solutions to improve the sustainability performance, which were selected and developed with the collaboration of local stakeholders. The solutions focus on food waste prevention, collection (increasing separate collection and household composting) and/or valorisation treatment (insect breeding, bioplastic production and improvement of centralised treatment). The results show that food waste prevention results in substantial improvements in all areas of protection when a significant quantity of food is saved. Solutions proposing innovative treatments such as insect breeding do not show clear improvements at the endpoint level, given current technology development level, but appear promising for some categories such as Revenues, Ecotoxicity, Land Use or Particulate Matter if the substituted products compensate the impact of the treatment (e.g., energy and water use). Enhancing the separate collection of organic waste can improve sustainability, but trade-offs may arise, e.g., decreased environmental savings from energy recovery at incineration. For this, the influence of the electricity mix (more or less decarbonised) should be carefully considered in future studies. The application of the solutions proposed to other cities should also consider potential bottlenecks such as legislation barriers, public acceptance, or management costs.
本研究重点对根特(比利时)、汉堡(德国)和佩奇(匈牙利)的城市固体废物有机部分管理进行全面可持续性评估。应用可持续性评估框架分析了中点水平(25 个影响类别)和终点水平(5 个保护领域)的社会、环境和经济后果。针对每个案例研究,分析了参考情景,并结合当地利益相关者的合作选择和开发了三种提高可持续性绩效的解决方案。这些解决方案侧重于防止食物浪费、收集(增加单独收集和家庭堆肥)和/或增值处理(昆虫养殖、生物塑料生产和集中处理改进)。结果表明,当大量食物被节省时,防止食物浪费会在所有保护领域带来实质性的改进。提出创新处理方法的解决方案,如昆虫养殖,在当前技术发展水平下,在终点水平上没有明显的改进,但如果替代产品补偿了处理的影响(例如,能源和水的使用),则在某些类别(如收入、生态毒性、土地利用或颗粒物)中似乎很有前景。增强有机废物的单独收集可以提高可持续性,但可能会出现权衡,例如,在焚烧时,能源回收的环境节约减少。为此,未来的研究应仔细考虑电力组合(脱碳程度更高或更低)的影响。在其他城市应用所提出的解决方案还应考虑潜在的瓶颈,例如立法障碍、公众接受度或管理成本。