Shi Junbo, Li Yun, Ren Yan, Hong Yingying, Huang Zhiwu, Chen Ying
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Ear Institute,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases(14DZ2260300.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul;35(7):577-581. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.07.001.
To evaluate the efficacy of modified mini-mental state examination(MMSE) in elderly patients with severe to profound hearing loss. A total of 24 elderly patients with severe to profound hearing loss from April to June 2019 were involved. Severe to profound hearing loss was defined by a pure-tone average of hearing thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in the better-hearing ear. Modified and original MMSE was completed for the patients at first visit. Two weeks later, they all return hospital and MMSE were carried out by the other method. The aggregate score and subitem score of MMSE by modified and original instrument were analyzed. The degree of cognitive impairment evaluated by two methods were compared. Among the 24 patients, the mean MMSE score by routine method and improved method were 10.88±9.70 and 25.29±3.70(<0.01). The average score of sub-items of MMSE with routine method and improved method are as follows: orientation 3.21±4.03 vs 8.71±1.92(<0.01), registration 1.04±1.33 vs 2.79±0.51(<0.01), attention and calculation 1.63±2.02 vs 4.00±1.41(<0.01), recall 0.79±1.14 vs 2.50±0.72(<0.01), language 4.21±2.11 vs 7.29±1.33(<0.01). Compared with the routine method, the degree of cognitive impairment getting better in 83.3% patients with improved method, meanwhile, 16.7% of the patients remain the same and no deterioration. The routine method of MMSE should be improved to seek the real cognitive state of the patients with severe to profound hearing loss.
评估改良简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)在重度至极重度听力损失老年患者中的有效性。纳入了2019年4月至6月期间的24例重度至极重度听力损失老年患者。重度至极重度听力损失定义为较好耳在0.5、1、2和4千赫兹处听力阈值的纯音平均值。患者首次就诊时完成改良版和原版MMSE检查。两周后,他们均返回医院,采用另一种方法进行MMSE检查。分析改良版和原版工具的MMSE总分及分项得分。比较两种方法评估的认知障碍程度。24例患者中,常规方法和改良方法的MMSE平均得分分别为10.88±9.70和25.29±3.70(P<0.01)。常规方法和改良方法的MMSE分项平均得分如下:定向力3.21±4.03对8.71±1.92(P<0.01),记忆1.04±1.33对2.79±0.51(P<0.01),注意力及计算1.63±2.02对4.00±1.41(P<0.01),回忆0.79±1.14对2.50±0.72(P<0.01),语言4.21±2.11对7.29±1.33(P<0.01)。与常规方法相比,改良方法使83.3%的患者认知障碍程度改善,同时,16.7%的患者保持不变且无恶化。应改进MMSE的常规方法以探寻重度至极重度听力损失患者的真实认知状态。