Suppr超能文献

[乳突根治术后术腔感染原因分析及再手术关键技术]

[Causes analysis of mastoid cavity infection after mastoidectomy and key techniques of revision mastoidectomy].

作者信息

Zuo Qiang, Zhang Ke, Ma Furong, Pan Tao, Song Weiming

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing,100191,China.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;35(6):521-524. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.06.008.

Abstract

To analyze the causes of infected mastoid cavity after mastoidectomy and explore the key techniques of revision mastoidectomy. Ninety-two patients, who underwent revision mastoidectomy due to mastoid cavity infection after mastoidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. There were 56 cases of canal wall up mastoidectomy plus tympanoplasty and 36 cases of canal wall down mastoidectomy plus tympanoplasty in previous surgery. The interval between the previous operation and this revision ranged from 7 months to 50 years, with a median of 9 years. By reviewing the general clinical data, preoperative HRCT scan of temporal bone and intraoperative findings, the defects of the previous operation and the region of the lesion were analyzed and counted. Out of the 92 cases, 7 cases(7.6%) had sigmoid sinus antedisplacement and low-lying middle cranial fossa, and 45 cases(48.9%) with facial nerve canal loss. Among the 36 patients who underwent canal wall down mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty, mastoid cells were removed in completely; 26 patients had high facial ridge, accounting for 72.2%(26/36). The defects of the previous operation included: stenosis of external auditory meatus(65/92, 70.7%), obstruction of Eustachian tube(11/92, 12.0%), and tympanitis(2/92, 2.2%). Residual or recurrent lesions were most common in mastoid process and tympanic sinus(50/92, 54.3%), followed by attic cell and anterior cavity(44/92, 47.8%), posterior tympanic cavity(29/92, 31.5%), perilabyrinthine cells(13/92, 14.1%), sinus meningeal angle(13/92, 14.1%), cells behind the facial nerve(12/92, 13.0%), Eustachian tube(10/92, 10.9%), and hypotympanum(9/92, 9.8%). The main causes of mastoid cavity infecion after mastoidectomy include incomplete removal of the lesion and inadequate drainage conditions. The key techniques of revisional mastoidectomy include disc-shaped operative cavity, skeletonization of mastoid process, reduction of facial nerve ridge, management of Eustachian tube and conchaplasty. The above techniques are also key in the first operation in order to improve the success rate of operation and avoid revision operation.

摘要

分析乳突根治术后术腔感染的原因,探讨改良乳突根治术的关键技术。回顾性分析92例因乳突根治术后术腔感染而行改良乳突根治术的患者。初次手术中行完壁式乳突根治术加鼓室成形术56例,开放式乳突根治术加鼓室成形术36例。初次手术至本次改良手术间隔时间7个月至50年,中位数为9年。通过回顾一般临床资料、术前颞骨HRCT扫描及术中所见,分析统计初次手术的不足及病变部位。92例中,乙状窦前置及中颅窝低位7例(7.6%),面神经管缺损45例(48.9%)。36例行开放式乳突根治术加鼓室成形术患者中,乳突气房均完全清除;26例存在高面神经嵴,占72.2%(26/36)。初次手术的不足包括:外耳道狭窄(65/92,70.7%)、咽鼓管阻塞(11/92,12.0%)、鼓膜炎(2/92,2.2%)。残留或复发病变最常见于乳突和鼓窦(50/92,54.3%),其次为上鼓室和前鼓室(44/92,47.8%)、后鼓室(29/92,31.5%)、迷路周围气房(13/92,14.1%)、窦脑膜角(13/92,14.1%)、面神经后气房(12/92,13.0%)、咽鼓管(10/92,10.9%)、下鼓室(9/92,9.8%)。乳突根治术后术腔感染的主要原因包括病变清除不彻底及引流不畅。改良乳突根治术的关键技术包括术腔碟形化、乳突轮廓化、降低面神经嵴、处理咽鼓管及外耳道成形术。上述技术在初次手术中同样关键,以提高手术成功率,避免再次手术。

相似文献

2
[Revisional radical mastoidectomy surgeries--25 cases'experience].[改良乳突根治术手术——25例经验]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 7;52(10):766-770. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.10.010.
3
[Analyses of the factors relevant to revision tympanomastoid surgery].[与鼓室乳突翻修手术相关因素的分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 May;51(5):333-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.05.004.
4
Results of revision mastoidectomy.乳突改良根治术的结果。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;129(2):138-41. doi: 10.1080/00016480802140893.
5
[Cause analysis of non dry ear after canal wall down mastoidectomy].[开放式乳突根治术后不干耳的原因分析]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Apr;32(7):530-533. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.07.013.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验