Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (N.A.H., A.A., J.P.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.A.H.).
Stroke. 2021 Oct;52(10):3258-3265. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031755. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Lifelong treatment with antiplatelet drugs is recommended following a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. Bleeding complications may offset the benefit of antiplatelet drugs in patients at increased risk of bleeding and low risk of recurrent ischemic events. We aimed to investigate the net benefit of antiplatelet treatment according to an individuals’ bleeding risk.
We pooled individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials (CAPRIE [Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events], ESPS-2 [European Stroke Prevention Study-2], MATCH [Management of Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients], CHARISMA [Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance], ESPRIT [European/Australasian Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial], and PRoFESS [Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes]) investigating antiplatelet therapy in the subacute or chronic phase after noncardioembolic transient ischemic attack or stroke. Patients were stratified into quintiles according to their predicted risk of major bleeding with the S2TOP-BLEED score. The annual risk of major bleeding and recurrent ischemic events was assessed per quintile for 4 scenarios: (1) aspirin monotherapy, (2) aspirin-clopidogrel versus aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy, (3) aspirin-dipyridamole versus clopidogrel, and (4) aspirin versus clopidogrel. Net benefit was calculated for the second, third, and fourth scenario.
Thirty seven thousand eighty-seven patients were included in the analyses. Both risk of major bleeding and recurrent ischemic events increased over quintiles of predicted bleeding risk, but risk of ischemic events was consistently higher (eg, from 0.7%/y (bottom quintile) to 3.2%/y (top quintile) for major bleeding on aspirin and from 2.5%/y to 10.2%/y for risk of ischemic events on aspirin). Treatment with aspirin-clopidogrel led to more major bleedings (0.9%–1.7% per year), than reduction in ischemic events (ranging from 0.4% to 0.9/1.0% per year) across all quintiles. There was no clear preference for either aspirin-dipyridamole or clopidogrel according to baseline bleeding risk.
Among patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke included in clinical trials of antiplatelet therapy, the risk of recurrent ischemic events and of major bleeding increase in parallel. Antiplatelet treatment cannot be individualized solely based on bleeding risk assessment.
建议对短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性卒中患者进行终生抗血小板治疗。对于出血风险高且复发缺血事件风险低的患者,出血并发症可能会抵消抗血小板药物的益处。我们旨在根据个体出血风险来探讨抗血小板治疗的净获益。
我们对 6 项随机临床试验(CAPRIE [氯吡格雷与阿司匹林在缺血事件风险患者中的应用]、ESPS-2 [欧洲卒中预防研究-2]、MATCH [氯吡格雷在高危患者中的动脉粥样硬化血栓形成管理]、CHARISMA [氯吡格雷在高动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险和缺血稳定、管理和避免中的应用]、ESPRIT [欧洲/澳大利亚可逆性缺血性卒中试验中的预防方案]和 PROOFESS [有效预防第二次卒中的预防方案])的个体患者数据进行了汇总,这些研究旨在探讨亚急性期或慢性期非心源性短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中后的抗血小板治疗。患者根据 S2TOP-BLEED 评分被分为 5 个五分位组,以预测大出血的风险。对于 4 种情况,每五分位组评估主要出血和复发性缺血事件的年风险:(1)阿司匹林单药治疗;(2)阿司匹林-氯吡格雷与阿司匹林或氯吡格雷单药治疗;(3)阿司匹林-双嘧达莫与氯吡格雷;(4)阿司匹林与氯吡格雷。计算第二、三和四种情况的净获益。
共纳入 37087 例患者。主要出血风险和复发性缺血事件风险随预测出血风险五分位组的增加而增加,但缺血事件风险始终较高(例如,阿司匹林的主要出血风险从五分位组最低的 0.7%/年增加到五分位组最高的 3.2%/年,阿司匹林的缺血事件风险从 2.5%/年增加到 10.2%/年)。与缺血事件减少(每年 0.4%至 0.9/1.0%)相比,阿司匹林-氯吡格雷治疗导致更多的大出血(每年 0.9%至 1.7%)。根据基线出血风险,阿司匹林-双嘧达莫或氯吡格雷均没有明显的优势。
在抗血小板治疗临床试验中纳入的短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性卒中患者中,复发性缺血事件和主要出血风险呈平行增加。抗血小板治疗不能仅根据出血风险评估进行个体化。