Suppr超能文献

单家三级学术医学中心神经放射科医师在头颈部病变影像学检查中的漏诊分析。

Analysis of misses in imaging of head and neck pathology by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary academic medical centre.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California - Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, University of California - Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2021 Oct;76(10):786.e9-786.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

Abstract

AIM

To analyse errors in head and neck (H&N) pathology made by attending neuroradiologists at a single tertiary-care centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A neuroradiology quality assurance (QA) database of radiological errors was searched for attending physician errors in H&N pathology from 2014-2020. Data were limited to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. Data were collected on missed pathologies and study types. Misses were grouped into three categories: central neck (thyroid gland, aerodigestive tract), lateral neck (salivary glands, lymph nodes, soft tissues), and face/orbits (orbits, sinuses, masticator space).

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 283,248 CT and MRI neuroradiology examinations were interpreted (all indications). Seventy-four H&N misses were identified comprising 85.1% perceptual and 14.9% interpretive errors. The distribution of errors was face/orbits (37.8%), central neck (36.5%), and lateral neck (25.7%). Clinically significant errors were found most commonly in the aerodigestive tract (21%), orbits (17.7%), masticator space, and parotid glands (14.5% each). The majority (67.6%) of the misses were detected on examinations that were not performed for a primary H&N indication; MRI brain was the most common examination (27%). Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses accounted for 48.6% of all misses.

CONCLUSION

The majority of H&N misses were perceptual and were detected on examinations not performed for a H&N indication. Clearly malignant or potentially malignant masses represented half of all misses.

摘要

目的

分析单一三级护理中心神经放射科主治医生在头颈部(H&N)病理学方面的错误。

材料与方法

在 2014 年至 2020 年期间,检索神经放射学质量保证(QA)数据库,以查找主治医生在 H&N 病理学方面的放射学错误。数据仅限于计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)报告。收集了遗漏的病理学和研究类型的数据。将遗漏分为三类:中央颈部(甲状腺、呼吸道)、侧颈部(唾液腺、淋巴结、软组织)和面部/眼眶(眼眶、鼻窦、咀嚼肌间隙)。

结果

在研究期间,共解读了 283248 例 CT 和 MRI 神经放射学检查(所有适应证)。确定了 74 例 H&N 遗漏,包括 85.1%的感知错误和 14.9%的解释错误。错误的分布为面部/眼眶(37.8%)、中央颈部(36.5%)和侧颈部(25.7%)。最常见的是呼吸道(21%)、眼眶(17.7%)、咀嚼肌间隙和腮腺(各占 14.5%)有临床意义的错误。大多数(67.6%)遗漏是在非原发性 H&N 适应证的检查中发现的;MRI 脑是最常见的检查(27%)。所有遗漏中,明显恶性或潜在恶性肿块占 48.6%。

结论

大多数 H&N 遗漏是感知错误,是在非 H&N 适应证的检查中发现的。明显恶性或潜在恶性肿块占所有遗漏的一半。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验