Kelly Patrick D, Fernando Shanik J, Malenke Jordan A, Chandra Rakesh K, Turner Justin H, Chambless Lola B
Department of Neurosurgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jul;82(Suppl 3):e70-e78. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701217. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Pituitary apoplexy is often treated urgently, but this is based on studies which assess vision categorically and dichotomizes the time interval between symptom onset and surgery which may introduce bias in measuring an association between the two. This study was aimed to assess for a relationship between continuously valued surgery delay and visual acuity recovery after pituitary apoplexy. In this retrospective study, all patients presenting with symptomatic pituitary apoplexy between 2004 and 2016 were identified from an institutional database. The primary endpoint was visual acuity improvement, measured as the difference in acuity from the pre- to postoperative period, and measured in Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) units. Analysis was performed using continuous values of time delay and visual acuity to assess for an underlying association. Thirty-two pituitary apoplexy patients were identified. Visual acuity deficits were reported in 81%. The median visual acuity was 0.35 LogMAR (Snellen's fraction 20/40) preoperatively, and 0.1 (20/25) postoperatively ( < 0.01). The time between symptom onset and surgery was not associated with improvement in visual acuity ( = 0.46). When the time delay and visual outcome were intentionally dichotomized, patients undergoing surgery within 2 days of symptom onset had 0.21 times the odds of a good visual outcome (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-1.05). When assessed as continuously valued measures, the time from symptom onset to surgical intervention and the improvement in visual acuity are not associated, although intentional dichotomization of data produced conflicting results.
垂体卒中通常需要紧急治疗,但这是基于一些研究,这些研究对视力进行分类评估,并将症状出现与手术之间的时间间隔进行二分法划分,这可能会在衡量两者之间的关联时引入偏差。 本研究旨在评估垂体卒中后连续取值的手术延迟与视力恢复之间的关系。 在这项回顾性研究中,从机构数据库中识别出2004年至2016年间所有出现症状性垂体卒中的患者。主要终点是视力改善情况,以术前至术后视力的差异来衡量,单位为最小分辨角对数(LogMAR)。使用手术延迟和视力的连续值进行分析,以评估潜在的关联。 共识别出32例垂体卒中患者。81%的患者报告有视力缺陷。术前中位视力为0.35 LogMAR(斯内伦分数20/40),术后为0.1(20/25)( < 0.01)。症状出现与手术之间的时间与视力改善无关( = 0.46)。当故意将时间延迟和视力结果进行二分法划分时,在症状出现后2天内接受手术的患者获得良好视力结果的几率为0.21倍(95%置信区间[CI]:0.04 - 1.05)。 当作为连续取值的指标进行评估时,从症状出现到手术干预的时间与视力改善无关,尽管对数据进行故意二分法划分产生了相互矛盾的结果。