Suppr超能文献

优化 cfDNA 处理的预分析变量并检测存档血浆样本中的 ctDNA。

Optimization of Preanalytical Variables for cfDNA Processing and Detection of ctDNA in Archival Plasma Samples.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 8;2021:5585148. doi: 10.1155/2021/5585148. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

DNA released from cells into the peripheral blood is known as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), representing a promising noninvasive source of biomarkers that could be utilized to manage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), among other diseases. The procedure for purification and handling of cfDNA is not yet standardized, and various preanalytical variables may affect the yield and analysis of cfDNA, including the purification kits, blood collection tubes, and centrifugation regime. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of these preanalytical variables on the yield of cfDNA by comparing three different purification kits DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen), and Quick-cfDNA Serum & Plasma Kit (Zymo Research). Two blood collection tubes (BCTs), EDTA-K2 and Cell-Free DNA (Streck), stored at four different time points before plasma was separated and cfDNA purified, were compared, and for EDTA tubes, two centrifugation regimes at 2000 × and 3000 × were tested. Additionally, we have tested the utility of long-term archival blood samples from DLBCL patients to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We observed a higher cfDNA yield using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen) purification kit, as well as a higher cfDNA yield when blood samples were collected in EDTA BCTs, with a centrifuge regime at 2000 × . Moreover, ctDNA detection was feasible from archival plasma samples with a median storage time of nine years.

摘要

从细胞释放到外周血中的 DNA 被称为游离 DNA(cfDNA),它是一种很有前途的非侵入性生物标志物来源,可以用于管理弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)等疾病。cfDNA 的纯化和处理程序尚未标准化,各种分析前变量可能会影响 cfDNA 的产量和分析,包括纯化试剂盒、血液采集管和离心方案。因此,我们旨在通过比较三种不同的纯化试剂盒(Qiagen 的 DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit、Qiagen 的 QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit 和 Zymo Research 的 Quick-cfDNA Serum & Plasma Kit)来研究这些分析前变量对 cfDNA 产量的影响。我们比较了两种血液采集管(EDTA-K2 和 Cell-Free DNA,Streck),分别在分离血浆和纯化 cfDNA 之前的四个不同时间点采集,对于 EDTA 管,我们测试了 2000×和 3000×两种离心方案。此外,我们还测试了从 DLBCL 患者的长期存档血液样本中检测循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)的能力。我们观察到使用 QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit(Qiagen)纯化试剂盒可获得更高的 cfDNA 产量,并且在 EDTA BCT 中采集的血液样本具有更高的 cfDNA 产量,离心方案为 2000×。此外,从中位储存时间为九年的存档血浆样本中可以检测到 ctDNA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4687/8285169/ddc4fd771626/BMRI2021-5585148.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验