Garcia Rodrigue, Waldmann Victor, Vanduynhoven Philippe, Nesti Martina, Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo Márcio, Narayanan Kumar, Conte Giulio, Guerra Jose M, Boveda Serge, Duncker David
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, F-86021 Poitiers, France.
Univ Poitiers, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, F-86021, Poitiers, France.
Europace. 2021 Dec 7;23(12):2039-2045. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab154.
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become one of the most common procedures in the electrophysiology lab with rapidly increasing volumes. Peri-procedural anaesthesia for AF ablation varies between centres, from general anaesthesia to deep or conscious sedation. The aim of this survey was to assess current sedation practices for AF ablation worldwide and its evolution over the last decade. Centres regularly performing AF ablation responded to an online survey. A total of 297 centres participated in the survey. Overall, the median (interquartile range) number of AF ablation procedures increased from 91 (43-200) to 200 (74-350) per year (P < 0.001) between 2010 and 2019. The proportion of cryoablation also increased from 17.0% to 33.2% (P < 0.001). In 2019, the most used sedation technique was general anaesthesia (40.5%), followed by conscious sedation (32.0%) and deep sedation (27.5%). Between 2010 and 2019, the proportion of procedures performed under general anaesthesia (+4.4%; P = 0.02) and deep sedation (+4.8%; P < 0.01) increased, whereas the use of conscious sedation decreased (-9.2%; P < 0.001). The most commonly used hypnotic drugs were propofol and midazolam, whereas the most commonly used opioid drugs were remifentanyl and fentanyl. This worldwide survey shows that the number of AF ablation procedures has more than doubled over the last decade and general anaesthesia remains most commonly used. Studies comparing outcomes between different sedation strategies are needed to guide optimal decision-making.
心房颤动(AF)导管消融术已成为电生理实验室中最常见的手术之一,手术量迅速增加。AF消融术的围手术期麻醉在不同中心有所不同,从全身麻醉到深度或清醒镇静。本调查的目的是评估全球范围内AF消融术当前的镇静实践及其在过去十年中的演变。定期进行AF消融术的中心对一项在线调查做出了回应。共有297个中心参与了该调查。总体而言,2010年至2019年间,每年AF消融手术的中位数(四分位间距)从91例(43 - 200例)增加到200例(74 - 350例)(P < 0.001)。冷冻消融的比例也从17.0%增加到33.2%(P < 0.001)。2019年,最常用的镇静技术是全身麻醉(40.5%),其次是清醒镇静(32.0%)和深度镇静(27.5%)。2010年至2019年间,在全身麻醉(+4.4%;P = 0.02)和深度镇静(+4.8%;P < 0.01)下进行的手术比例增加,而清醒镇静的使用减少(-9.2%;P < 0.001)。最常用的催眠药物是丙泊酚和咪达唑仑,而最常用的阿片类药物是瑞芬太尼和芬太尼。这项全球调查表明,在过去十年中,AF消融手术数量增加了一倍多,全身麻醉仍然是最常用的。需要进行比较不同镇静策略结果的研究以指导最佳决策。