Hunter College, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1106-1116. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12793. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Relatively little research has examined the precise components of hopelessness that increase vulnerability to suicidal thinking. We examined whether certainty about an absence of positive future outcomes (Certainty-AP) would more strongly predict suicide ideation over time than certainty about negative future outcomes (Certainty-N).
Young adults (N = 208), ages 18-34 (M = 19.08, SD = 2.22), with either recent suicide ideation, suicide attempt history, or past-year psychiatric diagnosis were assessed four times over 18 months.
We used multilevel modeling to assess within-participant differences in suicide ideation over time. Both Certainty-AP and Certainty-N predicted later suicide ideation above and beyond generalized hopelessness and depressive symptoms, when examined in separate models. However, Certainty-AP emerged as a stronger predictor of suicide ideation than Certainty-N when examined in the same model.
These findings suggest that certainty about an absence of positive future outcomes may have a more unique prospective relationship to SI than certainty about the presence of negative future outcomes. We discuss clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.
鲜有研究探讨导致自杀意念产生的绝望情绪的具体构成。本研究旨在检验,与未来负面结果相关的确定性(Certainty-N)相比,对未来积极结果缺失的确定性(Certainty-AP)是否会更强地预测随时间推移产生自杀意念。
研究共纳入 208 名年龄在 18-34 岁(M=19.08,SD=2.22)之间的年轻人,包括有自杀意念、自杀未遂史或过去一年有精神科诊断史的个体。研究采用 18 个月 4 次评估的方法对参与者进行评估。
本研究采用多层线性模型来评估随时间推移的自杀意念的个体内差异。在单独的模型中,Certainty-AP 和 Certainty-N 均预测了随后的自杀意念,且预测作用独立于一般性绝望感和抑郁症状。然而,当同时纳入同一模型进行检验时,Certainty-AP 对自杀意念的预测作用要强于 Certainty-N。
这些发现表明,与未来负面结果相关的确定性相比,对未来积极结果缺失的确定性可能与 SI 具有更强的前瞻性关系。本研究讨论了这些发现的临床和理论意义。