Institut für Deutsche Sprache und Literatur I, Universität zu Köln, Universitätsstraße 41, 50923, Köln, Germany.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1461-1486. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09793-0. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
The goal of this study is to provide better empirical insight into the licensing conditions of a large set of NPIs in German so that they can be used as reliable diagnostics in future research on negation-related phenomena. Experiment 1 tests the acceptability of 60 NPIs under semantic operators that are expected to license superstrong, strong, weak, and nonveridicality-licensed NPIs, respectively: antimorphic (not), anti-additive (no), downward entailing (hardly), nonveridical (maybe, question). Controls were positive assertions. Cluster analysis revealed seven clusters of NPIs, some of which confirm the licensing categorization from the literature (superstrong and weak NPIs). Other clusters show unclear patterns (overall high or medium ratings) and require further scrutiny in future research. One cluster showed high acceptability ratings only with the antimorphic and the question operator. Experiment 2 tested whether the source of this unexpected distribution was a rhetorical interpretation of the questions. Results suggest that rhetoricity was not the sole source. Overall, the results show gradual rather than categorical differences in acceptability, with higher acceptability corresponding to stronger negativity. The paper provides the detailed results for the individual NPIs as a preliminary normed acceptability index.
本研究的目的是为德语中大量否定限制词的许可条件提供更好的经验洞察,以便它们能够在未来关于否定相关现象的研究中作为可靠的诊断工具。实验 1 测试了 60 个否定限制词在语义算子下的可接受性,这些算子分别预计可许可超强、强、弱和非真值许可的否定限制词:反形(not)、反加(no)、向下蕴涵(hardly)、非真值(maybe、question)。控制条件为肯定断言。聚类分析揭示了七个否定限制词聚类,其中一些聚类与文献中的许可分类相吻合(超强和弱否定限制词)。其他聚类显示出不清晰的模式(整体高或中等评分),需要在未来的研究中进一步研究。一个聚类仅在使用反形和 question 算子时表现出高可接受性评分。实验 2 测试了这种意想不到的分布来源是否是对问题的修辞解释。结果表明,修辞性不是唯一的来源。总体而言,结果表明可接受性存在逐渐而非分类的差异,更高的可接受性对应更强的否定性。本文提供了个别否定限制词的详细结果,作为初步规范的可接受性指数。