• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与胱抑素 C 相比,2 型糖尿病患者接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗时,基于肌酐计算的肾小球滤过率被高估。

Overestimation of glomerular filtration rate calculated from creatinine as compared with cystatin C in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving sodium-glucose cotransportor 2 inhibitors.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2022 Jan;39(1):e14659. doi: 10.1111/dme.14659. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14659
PMID:34309941
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this cross-sectional study is to compare creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcr) and cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys) between patients with type 2 diabetes receiving and not receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

METHODS

The plasma specimens from 90 patients with type 2 diabetes who had been receiving SGLT2 inhibitors for at least 24 weeks (SGLT2 inhibitors group) were selected. Meanwhile, the plasma specimens from age-, sex- and BMI-matched patients with type 2 diabetes not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (non-SGLT2 inhibitors group) in 1:1 matching were also selected for comparison. eGFRcr and eGFRcys were calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.

RESULTS

When compared with the non-SGLT2 inhibitors group, eGFRcr was significantly higher in the SGLT2 inhibitors group (70.54 ± 24.87 vs. 79.95 ± 19.57 mL/min/1.73 m , p = 0.014) while eGFRcys was not different (66.32 ± 24.98 vs 69.17 ± 20.10 ml/min/1.73 m , p = 0.401). Based on eGFRcr, the chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage in the SGLT2 inhibitors group was lower than that in the non-SGLT2 inhibitors group, but it was not different when CKD stage was classified by eGFRcys. The difference between eGFRcr and eGFRcys (eGFRcr-cys) was significantly higher in the SGLT2 inhibitors group (4.22 ± 11.20 vs. 10.78 ± 10.42 ml/min/1.73 m , p < 0.001). In male patients, there was significant correlation between the eGFRcr-cys and duration of receiving SGLT-2 inhibitors (r = 0.398, p = 0.004). This correlation was not found in female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a discrepancy between eGFRcr and eGFRcys in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving SGLT2 inhibitors when compared with those not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors.

摘要

目的

本横断面研究旨在比较接受和未接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂的 2 型糖尿病患者的基于肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFRcr)和基于胱抑素 C 的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFRcys)。

方法

选择 90 例已接受 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗至少 24 周的 2 型糖尿病患者的血浆标本(SGLT2 抑制剂组),同时选择年龄、性别和 BMI 匹配的 1:1 未接受 SGLT2 抑制剂的 2 型糖尿病患者的血浆标本作为对照(非 SGLT2 抑制剂组)。使用慢性肾脏病流行病学合作方程计算 eGFRcr 和 eGFRcys。

结果

与非 SGLT2 抑制剂组相比,SGLT2 抑制剂组的 eGFRcr 显著升高(70.54 ± 24.87 比 79.95 ± 19.57 ml/min/1.73 m ,p = 0.014),而 eGFRcys 无差异(66.32 ± 24.98 比 69.17 ± 20.10 ml/min/1.73 m ,p = 0.401)。基于 eGFRcr,SGLT2 抑制剂组的慢性肾脏病(CKD)分期低于非 SGLT2 抑制剂组,但基于 eGFRcys 分类时则无差异。SGLT2 抑制剂组的 eGFRcr 与 eGFRcys 之间的差值(eGFRcr-cys)显著高于非 SGLT2 抑制剂组(4.22 ± 11.20 比 10.78 ± 10.42 ml/min/1.73 m ,p < 0.001)。在男性患者中,eGFRcr-cys 与接受 SGLT-2 抑制剂的时间呈显著相关性(r = 0.398,p = 0.004)。在女性患者中则未发现这种相关性。

结论

与未接受 SGLT2 抑制剂的患者相比,接受 SGLT2 抑制剂的 2 型糖尿病患者的 eGFRcr 和 eGFRcys 之间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Overestimation of glomerular filtration rate calculated from creatinine as compared with cystatin C in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving sodium-glucose cotransportor 2 inhibitors.与胱抑素 C 相比,2 型糖尿病患者接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗时,基于肌酐计算的肾小球滤过率被高估。
Diabet Med. 2022 Jan;39(1):e14659. doi: 10.1111/dme.14659. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Glomerular filtration rate estimation using cystatin C alone or combined with creatinine as a confirmatory test.单独使用胱抑素 C 或联合使用肌酐作为确证试验估算肾小球滤过率。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Jun;29(6):1195-203. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft509. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Applicability of chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration equations in a Chinese population.慢性肾脏病流行病学合作方程在中国人群中的适用性。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Mar;29(3):580-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft374. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
Comparison of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate with Both Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) versus Single Analyte (eGFRcr or eGFRcys) Using CKD-EPI and MDRD Equations in Tertiary Care Hospital Settings.在三级保健医院环境中,使用 CKD-EPI 和 MDRD 方程比较血清肌酐和胱抑素 C(eGFRcr-cys)与单一分析物(eGFRcr 或 eGFRcys)估算肾小球滤过率的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Jul;30(7):701-706. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.07.701.
5
Discrepancy between estimated glomerular filtration rate by creatinine versus cystatin C in different patient care settings.在不同的患者护理环境中,基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的估计肾小球滤过率之间存在差异。
Clin Biochem. 2024 Oct;131-132:110801. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110801. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate, vascular disease, and mortality in persons with diabetes in the U.S.基于胱抑素C和肌酐的估计肾小球滤过率、血管疾病及美国糖尿病患者的死亡率
Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):1002-8. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1910. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
7
Association of Intraindividual Difference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate by Creatinine vs Cystatin C and End-stage Kidney Disease and Mortality.基于肌酐与胱抑素C估算的肾小球滤过率个体内差异与终末期肾病及死亡率的关联
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148940. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48940.
8
Creatinine- versus cystatin C-based renal function assessment in the Northern Manhattan Study.基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 的肾功能评估在北方曼哈顿研究中的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206839. eCollection 2018.
9
Geriatric assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a cross-sectional study.估算肾小球滤过率的老年评估:一项横断面研究。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 Mar;24(3):216-224. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01797-4. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Association of Estimated GFR Calculated Using Race-Free Equations With Kidney Failure and Mortality by Black vs Non-Black Race.基于种族无关方程估算肾小球滤过率与黑种人与非黑种人肾衰竭和死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Jun 21;327(23):2306-2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8801.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Cardiovascular and Renal Biomarkers Associated with SGLT2 Inhibitors Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者中与SGLT2抑制剂治疗相关的心血管和肾脏生物标志物变化
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Oct 25;15(11):2526. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112526.
2
Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cardiorenal patients: a step forward.心肾疾病患者肾小球滤过率的评估:向前迈进的一步。
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Apr 10;16(7):1049-1055. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad083. eCollection 2023 Jul.