Chen Debbie C, Shlipak Michael G, Scherzer Rebecca, Bauer Scott R, Potok O Alison, Rifkin Dena E, Ix Joachim H, Muiru Anthony N, Hsu Chi-Yuan, Estrella Michelle M
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Kidney Health Research Collaborative, San Francisco VA Health Care System & University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148940. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48940.
As cystatin C is increasingly adopted to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), clinicians will encounter patients in whom cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) and creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr) differ widely. The clinical implications of these differences, eGFRdiffcys-cr, are unknown.
To evaluate the associations of eGFRdiffcys-cr with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prospective cohort study of 4956 individuals with mild to moderate CKD from 7 clinical centers in the United States who enrolled in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study between 2003 to 2018. Statistical analyses were completed in December 2021.
eGFRdiffcys-cr (eGFRcys - eGFRcr) was calculated at baseline and annually thereafter for 3 years. Because 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 represents a clinically meaningful difference in eGFR that also distinguishes CKD stages, eGFRdiffcys-cr was categorized as: less than -15 mL/min/1.73 m2, -15 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater.
The outcomes of ESKD, defined as initiation of maintenance dialysis or receipt of a kidney transplant, and all-cause mortality were adjudicated from study entry until administrative censoring in 2018.
Among 4956 participants with mean (SD) age of 59.5 (10.5) years, 2152 (43.4%) were Black, 515 (10.4%) were Hispanic, and 2113 (42.6%) were White. There were 2156 (43.5%) women and 2800 (56.5%) men. At baseline, eGFRcys and eGFRcr values differed by more than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 in one-third of participants (1638 participants [33.1%]). Compared with participants with similar baseline eGFRcys and eGFRcr (eGFRdiffcys-cr -15 to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), those in whom eGFRcys was substantially lower than eGFRcr (eGFRdiffcys-cr < -15 mL/min/1.73 m2) had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.40-2.48) while those with eGFRdiffcys-cr of 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater had lower risks of ESKD (subHR [SHR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89) and mortality (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, CI 0.58-0.81). In time-updated analyses, participants with eGFRdiffcys-cr less than -15 mL/min/1.73 m2 had higher risks of ESKD (SHR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.10-3.04) and mortality (HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.19-4.19) compared with participants with similar eGFRcys and eGFRcr. Conversely, participants with eGFRdiffcys-cr of 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater had lower risks of ESKD (SHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71) and mortality (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.75). Longitudinal changes in eGFRdiffcys-cr were associated with mortality risk. Compared with participants who had similar slopes by eGFRcys and eGFRcr, those with smaller eGFRcr declines had an 8-fold increased mortality risk (HR, 8.20; 95% CI, 6.37-10.56), and those with larger apparent declines by eGFRcr had a lower mortality risk (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.24).
These findings suggest that large differences between eGFRcys and eGFRcr were common in persons with CKD. These differences and their changes over time may be informative of ESKD and mortality risks, warranting monitoring of both eGFRcys and eGFRcr in this high-risk population.
随着胱抑素C越来越多地用于估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR),临床医生将会遇到基于胱抑素C的eGFR(eGFRcys)和基于肌酐的eGFR(eGFRcr)差异很大的患者。这些差异(eGFRdiffcys-cr)的临床意义尚不清楚。
评估eGFRdiffcys-cr与慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的终末期肾病(ESKD)及死亡率之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项对来自美国7个临床中心的4956例轻至中度CKD患者进行的前瞻性队列研究,这些患者于2003年至2018年参加了慢性肾功能不全队列(CRIC)研究。统计分析于2021年12月完成。
在基线时以及之后3年每年计算eGFRdiffcys-cr(eGFRcys - eGFRcr)。由于15 mL/min/1.73 m2代表eGFR中具有临床意义的差异,且该差异也用于区分CKD分期,因此eGFRdiffcys-cr被分类为:小于-15 mL/min/1.73 m2、-15至15 mL/min/1.73 m2以及15 mL/min/1.73 m2或更高。
ESKD的结局定义为开始维持性透析或接受肾移植,全因死亡率从研究入组直至2018年行政审查进行判定。
在4956名平均(标准差)年龄为59.5(10.5)岁的参与者中,2152名(43.4%)为黑人,515名(10.4%)为西班牙裔,2113名(42.6%)为白人。有2156名(43.5%)女性和2800名(56.5%)男性。在基线时,三分之一的参与者(1638名参与者[33.1%])的eGFRcys和eGFRcr值相差超过15 mL/min/1.73 m2。与基线eGFRcys和eGFRcr相似的参与者(eGFRdiffcys-cr为-15至15 mL/min/1.73 m2)相比,eGFRcys显著低于eGFRcr的参与者(eGFRdiffcys-cr < -15 mL/min/1.73 m2)有更高的死亡风险(风险比[HR],1.86;95%置信区间,1.40 - 2.48),而eGFRdiffcys-cr为15 mL/min/1.73 m2或更高的参与者发生ESKD的风险较低(亚风险比[SHR],0.73;95%置信区间,0.59 - 0.89)且死亡风险较低(HR,0.68;95%置信区间,CI 0.58 - 0.81)。在时间更新分析中,与eGFRcys和eGFRcr相似的参与者相比,eGFRdiffcys-cr小于-15 mL/min/1.73 m2的参与者发生ESKD的风险更高(SHR,1.83;95%置信区间,1.10 - 3.04)和死亡风险更高(HR,3.03;95%置信区间,2.19 - 4.19)。相反,eGFRdiffcys-cr为15 mL/min/1.73 m2或更高的参与者发生ESKD的风险较低(SHR,0.50;95%置信区间,0.35 - 0.71)和死亡风险较低(HR,0.58;95%置信区间,0.45 - 0.75)。eGFRdiffcys-cr的纵向变化与死亡风险相关。与eGFRcys和eGFRcr斜率相似的参与者相比,eGFRcr下降较小的参与者死亡风险增加8倍(HR,8.20;95%置信区间,6.37 - 10.56),而eGFRcr明显下降较大的参与者死亡风险较低(HR,0.14;95%置信区间,0.08 - 0.24)。
这些发现表明,CKD患者中eGFRcys和eGFRcr之间的巨大差异很常见。这些差异及其随时间的变化可能有助于了解ESKD和死亡风险,因此有必要对这一高风险人群同时监测eGFRcys和eGFRcr。