• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sanya Central Hospital (Hainan Third People's Hospital), Sanya, China.

Department of Urology, Yuzhou People's Hospital, Xuchang, China.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14639. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14639. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14639
PMID:34309982
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects.

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was done and 36 studies included 23 013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; 8178 of them were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14 835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91-66.90, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (MD, -1.71; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.00, P < .001), lower blood loss (MD, -133.82; 95% CI, -220.92 to -46.73, P = .003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67, P < .001) and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90, P < .001) compared with open nephroureterectomy. However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2-5-years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.18, P = .46), 2-5-years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69-1.28, P = .68) and 2-5-years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91-1.87, P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, lower blood loss, transfusion need and overall complication compared with open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估开放式输尿管切除术与腹腔镜输尿管切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者术后结果方面的影响。

方法

系统检索至 2021 年 1 月,并纳入 36 项研究,共 23013 例上尿路尿路上皮癌患者,其中 8178 例为腹腔镜输尿管切除术,14835 例为开放式输尿管切除术。这些研究报告了开放式输尿管切除术与腹腔镜输尿管切除术在治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的疗效和安全性方面的关系。我们使用二项或连续方法,以随机或固定效应模型,计算比值比(OR)或均数差(MD)及其 95%置信区间(CI),以评估开放式输尿管切除术与腹腔镜输尿管切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌治疗中的疗效和安全性。

结果

与开放式输尿管切除术相比,腹腔镜输尿管切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中具有明显更长的手术时间(MD,43.90;95%CI,20.91-66.90,P<0.001)、更短的住院时间(MD,-1.71;95%CI,-2.42 至-1.00,P<0.001)、更少的出血量(MD,-133.82;95%CI,-220.92 至-46.73,P=0.003)、更低的输血需求(OR,0.56;95%CI,0.47-0.67,P<0.001)和更低的总并发症发生率(OR,0.79;95%CI,0.70-0.90,P<0.001)。然而,在 2-5 年无复发生存率(OR,0.90;95%CI,0.69-1.18,P=0.46)、2-5 年癌症特异性生存率(OR,0.94;95%CI,0.69-1.28,P=0.68)和 2-5 年总生存率(OR,1.31;95%CI,0.91-1.87,P=0.15)方面,腹腔镜输尿管切除术与开放式输尿管切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中没有显著差异。

结论

与开放式输尿管切除术相比,腹腔镜输尿管切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中可能具有更长的手术时间、更短的住院时间、更少的出血量、输血需求和总并发症发生率。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic compared with open nephroureterectomy in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systemic review and a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14639. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14639. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.开放性肾输尿管切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 13;8:729686. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686. eCollection 2021.
3
Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):205-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes.经腹腔与经腹膜后腹腔镜肾输尿管全长切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和比较结局的汇总分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 May 29;21(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03046-1.
5
Complete transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in a single position for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and comparative outcomes.单部位完全经腹腔腹腔镜下肾盂输尿管癌根治术治疗上尿路上皮癌及对比研究结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul 2;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02297-0.
6
Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖口切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后的肿瘤学结局
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.081. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years.机器人辅助与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌:跨越十年的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;38:101607. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607. Epub 2021 May 16.
8
Oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial neoplasia in Denmark.丹麦根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮肿瘤的肿瘤学结果。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Feb;54(1):58-64. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1710562. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性和/或局部进展性上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学结果
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0202-x.
10
Intermediate-term oncological outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open bilateral nephroureterectomy for dialysis and kidney transplant patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜与开放双侧肾输尿管切除术治疗透析及肾移植的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的中期肿瘤学结局
J Endourol. 2009 Jul;23(7):1139-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0162.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Oncological Outcomes between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches in Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.腹腔镜肾盂输尿管癌根治术中经腹腔与后腹腔入路的肿瘤学结果比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 29;60(3):421. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030421.
2
Atypical presentations of UTUC: a case report of three patients.上尿路尿路上皮癌的非典型表现:三例患者的病例报告
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 8;13:1294316. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1294316. eCollection 2023.
3
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.
上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后的肿瘤学结局:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Aug 31;12(8):1351-1362. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-882. Epub 2023 Jul 28.