• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发热性尿路感染男性患者使用 7 天与 14 天抗生素治疗对症状缓解的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of 7 vs 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy on Resolution of Symptoms Among Afebrile Men With Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 Jul 27;326(4):324-331. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9899.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2021.9899
PMID:34313686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8317010/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Determination of optimal treatment durations for common infectious diseases is an important strategy to preserve antibiotic effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether 7 days of treatment is noninferior to 14 days when using ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole to treat urinary tract infection (UTI) in afebrile men.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of afebrile men with presumed symptomatic UTI treated with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at 2 US Veterans Affairs medical centers (enrollment, April 2014 through December 2019; final follow-up, January 28, 2020). Of 1058 eligible men, 272 were randomized.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants continued the antibiotic prescribed by their treating clinician for 7 days of treatment and were randomized to receive continued antibiotic therapy (n = 136) or placebo (n = 136) for days 8 to 14 of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The prespecified primary outcome was resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after completion of active antibiotic treatment. A noninferiority margin of 10% was selected. The as-treated population (participants who took ≥26 of 28 doses and missed no more than 2 consecutive doses) was used for the primary analysis, and a secondary analysis included all patients as randomized, regardless of treatment adherence. Secondary outcomes included recurrence of UTI symptoms and/or adverse events within 28 days of stopping study medication.

RESULTS

Among 272 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [62-73] years) who were randomized, 100% completed the trial and 254 (93.4%) were included in the primary as-treated analysis. Symptom resolution occurred in 122/131 (93.1%) participants in the 7-day group vs 111/123 (90.2%) in the 14-day group (difference, 2.9% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.2% to ∞]), meeting the noninferiority criterion. In the secondary as-randomized analysis, symptom resolution occurred in 125/136 (91.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 123/136 (90.4%) in the 14-day group (difference, 1.5% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -5.8% to ∞]) Recurrence of UTI symptoms occurred in 13/131 (9.9%) participants in the 7-day group vs 15/123 (12.9%) in the 14-day group (difference, -3.0% [95% CI, -10.8% to 6.2%]; P = .70). Adverse events occurred in 28/136 (20.6%) participants in the 7-day group vs 33/136 (24.3%) in the 14-day group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among afebrile men with suspected UTI, treatment with ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for 7 days was noninferior to 14 days of treatment with regard to resolution of UTI symptoms by 14 days after antibiotic therapy. The findings support the use of a 7-day course of ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as an alternative to a 14-day course for treatment of afebrile men with UTI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01994538.

摘要

重要性:确定常见传染病的最佳治疗持续时间是保护抗生素有效性的重要策略。

目的:确定在使用环丙沙星或复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗无发热男性下尿路感染(UTI)时,治疗 7 天是否与 14 天一样有效。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 2 家美国退伍军人事务医疗中心进行的无发热男性拟诊症状性 UTI 患者使用环丙沙星或复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验(招募期:2014 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月;最终随访期:2020 年 1 月 28 日)。共有 1058 名符合条件的男性,其中 272 名被随机分组。

干预措施:参与者继续接受其治疗医生开的抗生素治疗 7 天,并随机接受继续抗生素治疗(n=136)或安慰剂(n=136)治疗 8 至 14 天。

主要结果和措施:预先指定的主要结局是在完成主动抗生素治疗后 14 天内 UTI 症状的缓解。选择了 10%的非劣效性边界。主要分析采用了接受治疗的人群(接受≥28 剂中的 26 剂且不超过连续 2 剂的参与者),次要分析包括所有按随机分组的患者,无论治疗依从性如何。次要结局包括停药后 28 天内 UTI 症状和/或不良事件的复发。

结果:在 272 名随机分组的患者(中位数[四分位间距]年龄,69[62-73]岁)中,100%完成了试验,254 名(93.4%)患者纳入主要按接受治疗的分析。在 7 天组中,131 名参与者中有 122 名(93.1%)症状缓解,14 天组中 123 名(90.2%)症状缓解(差异,2.9%[1 侧 97.5%置信区间,-5.2%至 ∞]),符合非劣效性标准。在次要的按随机分组分析中,在 7 天组中,136 名参与者中有 125 名(91.9%)症状缓解,在 14 天组中,136 名参与者中有 123 名(90.4%)症状缓解(差异,1.5%[1 侧 97.5%置信区间,-5.8%至 ∞])。在 7 天组中,131 名参与者中有 13 名(9.9%)症状复发,在 14 天组中,123 名参与者中有 15 名(12.9%)症状复发(差异,-3.0%[95%置信区间,-10.8%至 6.2%];P=0.70)。在 7 天组中,136 名参与者中有 28 名(20.6%)发生不良事件,在 14 天组中,136 名参与者中有 33 名(24.3%)发生不良事件。

结论和相关性:在无发热的男性疑似 UTI 患者中,与使用 14 天抗生素治疗相比,使用环丙沙星或复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗 7 天在治疗后 14 天内缓解 UTI 症状方面无劣效性。研究结果支持使用 7 天疗程的环丙沙星或复方磺胺甲噁唑作为替代 14 天疗程治疗无发热男性 UTI 的方法。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01994538。

相似文献

1
Effect of 7 vs 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy on Resolution of Symptoms Among Afebrile Men With Urinary Tract Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.发热性尿路感染男性患者使用 7 天与 14 天抗生素治疗对症状缓解的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 27;326(4):324-331. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9899.
2
In afebrile men with UTIs, 7 d of ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was noninferior to 14 d.在无发热的尿路感染男性患者中,环丙沙星或复方新诺明治疗7天并不劣于治疗14天。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Dec;174(12):JC141. doi: 10.7326/ACPJ202112210-141. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
3
Effect of C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antibiotic Treatment Duration, 7-Day Treatment, or 14-Day Treatment on 30-Day Clinical Failure Rate in Patients With Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.C-反应蛋白指导的抗生素治疗持续时间、7 天疗程或 14 天疗程对无并发症革兰氏阴性菌血症患者 30 天临床失败率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2160-2169. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6348.
4
Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头孢吡肟/恩他唑巴坦对比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性尿路感染或急性肾盂肾炎患者的临床疗效和微生物学清除率:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1304-1314. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.17034.
5
A Seven-Day Course of TMP-SMX May Be as Effective as a Seven-Day Course of Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Pyelonephritis.复方磺胺甲恶唑七日疗程治疗肾盂肾炎的疗效可能与环丙沙星七日疗程相当。
Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):842-845. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.025. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
A randomized trial of short-course ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in women. Ciprofloxacin Urinary Tract Infection Group.一项关于短程环丙沙星、氧氟沙星或甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗女性急性尿路感染的随机试验。环丙沙星尿路感染组。
Am J Med. 1999 Mar;106(3):292-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00026-1.
7
Oral fosfomycin versus ciprofloxacin in women with E.coli febrile urinary tract infection, a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (FORECAST).口服磷霉素与环丙沙星治疗大肠埃希菌致女性发热性尿路感染的双盲安慰剂对照随机对照非劣效试验(FORECAST)。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3562-2.
8
Urinary tract infection in male veterans: treatment patterns and outcomes.男性退伍军人的尿路感染:治疗模式和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14;173(1):62-8. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.829.
9
Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial.美罗培南-维巴坦与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗复杂性尿路感染的临床疗效和微生物清除率:TANGO I 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0438.
10
Lactobacilli vs antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in postmenopausal women.乳酸杆菌与抗生素预防尿路感染:一项针对绝经后女性的随机、双盲、非劣效性试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 May 14;172(9):704-12. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.777.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Therapy Duration for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: An Evidence-Based Review.耐多药革兰氏阴性菌感染的抗生素治疗疗程:一项基于证据的综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 18;26(14):6905. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146905.
2
Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of male community-acquired urinary tract infections using reimbursement data.利用报销数据评估男性社区获得性尿路感染治疗中的抗生素处方情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 28;20(7):e0327197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327197. eCollection 2025.
3
Urinary tract infection in adults: gaps in current guidelines - opinions from an international multidisciplinary panel and relevance to clinical practice.成人尿路感染:现行指南的差距——来自国际多学科专家组的意见及其与临床实践的相关性
BMC Proc. 2025 Jul 3;19(Suppl 16):18. doi: 10.1186/s12919-025-00333-5.
4
Antibiotic De-Escalation in the Intensive Care Unit: Rationale and Potential Strategies.重症监护病房中的抗生素降阶梯治疗:基本原理与潜在策略
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 3;14(5):467. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14050467.
5
Evaluation of shorter versus longer antifungal treatment durations for . urinary tract infections among hospitalized adults.住院成年患者尿路感染的短疗程与长疗程抗真菌治疗评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Jun 4;69(6):e0192024. doi: 10.1128/aac.01920-24. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
6
A comparison of empiric therapy with cefazolin versus ceftriaxone for patients with complicated urinary tract infections in a tertiary care veterans affairs medical center.在一家三级医疗退伍军人事务医疗中心,对经验性使用头孢唑林与头孢曲松治疗复杂性尿路感染患者的疗效进行比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10494-5.
7
Utility of urine culture in men with uncomplicated cystitis in ambulatory settings.门诊环境下尿液培养在单纯性膀胱炎男性患者中的应用价值。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 27;5(1):e69. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.42. eCollection 2025.
8
Effect of Inadequate Treatment in Adult Patients with Community-Acquired Acute Pyelonephritis Due to Enterobacterales Under Empirical Management with Cefazolin.在经验性使用头孢唑林治疗的情况下,大肠埃希菌所致社区获得性急性肾盂肾炎成年患者治疗不充分的影响。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;14(2):197. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14020197.
9
Improving effective antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevention in ambulatory care: lessons from secondary appraisal of Belgian anti-infectious treatment care guidelines.提高门诊医疗中有效的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)预防水平:对比利时抗感染治疗护理指南二次评估的经验教训
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1251-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05075-y. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
10
Antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections-a systematic review.常见细菌感染的抗生素使用疗程——一项系统评价
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jan 29;7(1):dlae215. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae215. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Three Weeks Versus Six Weeks of Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Pilot Trial.三周与六周抗生素治疗糖尿病足骨髓炎:一项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1539-e1545. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1758.
2
No Clinical Benefit to Treating Male Urinary Tract Infection Longer Than Seven Days: An Outpatient Database Study.治疗男性尿路感染超过七天无临床益处:一项门诊数据库研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 May 6;6(6):ofz216. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz216. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Symptomatic treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in the ambulatory setting: randomised, double blind trial.门诊环境中单纯性下尿路感染的对症治疗:随机双盲试验。
BMJ. 2017 Nov 7;359:j4784. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4784.
4
Urinary Tract Infection.尿路感染。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):ITC49-ITC64. doi: 10.7326/AITC201710030.
5
Treatment duration of febrile urinary tract infection: a pragmatic randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial in men and women.发热性尿路感染的治疗疗程:一项针对男性和女性的实用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 3;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0835-3.
6
Duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗时间:一项多中心随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1257-65. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3633.
7
Comparison of fosfomycin to ertapenem for outpatient or step-down therapy of extended-spectrum β-lactamase urinary tract infections.磷霉素与厄他培南治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶尿路感染的门诊或降阶梯治疗比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Jul;48(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Executive Summary: Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.执行摘要:实施抗生素管理计划:美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):1197-1202. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw217.
9
Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection.腹腔内感染短程抗菌治疗试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):1996-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162.
10
Urinary tract infection in male veterans: treatment patterns and outcomes.男性退伍军人的尿路感染:治疗模式和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14;173(1):62-8. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.829.