Wolcott Michael D, Lobczowski Nikki G, Zeeman Jacqueline M, McLaughlin Jacqueline E
The University of North Carolina, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The University of North Carolina, Adams School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Jun;85(6):8546. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8546. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
To explore pharmacists' and pharmacy students' perceptions regarding the significance of changing the features of test item scenario (eg, switching from a health care to a non-health care context) on their situational judgment test (SJT) responses. Fifteen Doctor of Pharmacy students and 15 pharmacists completed a 12-item SJT intended to measure empathy. The test included six scenarios in a health care context and six scenarios in a non-health care context; participants had to rank potential response options in order of appropriateness and no two items could be of equal rank. Qualitative data were collected individually from participants using think-aloud and cognitive interview techniques. During the cognitive interview, participants were asked how they selected their final responses for each item and whether they would have changed their answer if features of the scenario were switched (eg, changed to a non-health care context if the original item was in a health care context). Interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was conducted to identify the features of the scenario for each item that were perceived to impact response selections. Participants stated that they would have changed their responses on average 51.3% of the time (range 20%-100%) if the features of the scenario for an item were changed. Qualitative analysis identified four pertinent scenario features that may influence response selections, which included information about the examinee, the actors in the scenario, the relationship between examinee and actors, and details about the situation. There was no discernible pattern linking scenario features to the component of empathy being measured or participant type. Results from this study suggest that the features of the scenario described in an SJT item could influence response selections. These features should be considered in the SJT design process and require further research to determine the extent of their impact on SJT performance.
探讨药剂师和药学专业学生对于改变测试项目情景特征(例如,从医疗保健情景转换为非医疗保健情景)对其情景判断测试(SJT)回答的重要性的看法。15名药学博士学生和15名药剂师完成了一项旨在测量同理心的12项SJT。该测试包括六个医疗保健情景和六个非医疗保健情景;参与者必须按照适当程度对潜在的回答选项进行排序,且两个选项不能具有相同的排名。使用出声思考和认知访谈技术分别从参与者那里收集定性数据。在认知访谈中,询问参与者他们如何为每个项目选择最终回答,以及如果情景特征发生转换(例如,如果原始项目处于医疗保健情景中则转换为非医疗保健情景)他们是否会改变答案。访谈内容被转录,并进行了主题分析以确定每个项目中被认为会影响回答选择的情景特征。参与者表示,如果一个项目的情景特征发生改变,他们平均会在51.3%的情况下(范围为20% - 100%)改变回答。定性分析确定了四个可能影响回答选择的相关情景特征,包括关于考生的信息、情景中的角色、考生与角色之间的关系以及情景细节。在情景特征与所测量的同理心成分或参与者类型之间没有明显的关联模式。本研究结果表明,SJT项目中描述的情景特征可能会影响回答选择。在SJT设计过程中应考虑这些特征,并且需要进一步研究以确定它们对SJT表现的影响程度。