• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托槽脱落时的疼痛和脱落力:一项临床研究。

Pain and removal force associated with bracket debonding: a clinical study.

机构信息

Nihon University School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Nihon University School of Dentistry, Division of Clinical Research, Dental Research Center, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, Japann.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Jul 23;29:e20200879. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0879. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0879
PMID:34320118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8315792/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pain is a problem during bracket removal, and more comfortable treatment is needed. This study examined the association of pain with the removal force required for ceramic brackets, compared with metal and plastic brackets, to determine which removal method resulted in less pain and discomfort.

METHODOLOGY

81 subjects (mean age, 25.1 years; 25 males and 56 females) were enrolled, from whom 1,235 brackets (407 ceramic, 432 plastic, and 396 metal) were removed. Measured teeth were distinguished at six segments. Pain was measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the removal of each bracket. An additional grip was placed on the grips of debonding pliers with right-angled beaks; a mini loading cell sensor pinched by the grips was used to measure removal force during debonding. VAS and force values were statistically analyzed. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were performed for multiple comparisons; multiple regression analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Forces in the upper and lower anterior segments were significantly smaller (p<0.05) than those in the other segments. Pain tended to be greater in the upper and lower anterior segments than in the posterior segments. In all segments, the removal force was greater for metal brackets than for plastic or ceramic brackets. Ceramic brackets caused significantly greater pain than plastic brackets for the upper and lower anterior segments. Debonding force was involved in the brackets, following adjustments for pain, upper left segment, age, and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and discomfort are likely to occur during bracket debonding.

摘要

目的

托槽去除过程中会产生疼痛,因此需要更舒适的治疗方法。本研究比较了陶瓷托槽、金属托槽和塑料托槽去除所需的力与疼痛的关系,以确定哪种去除方法产生的疼痛和不适更少。

方法

共纳入 81 名受试者(平均年龄 25.1 岁;男性 25 名,女性 56 名),共去除 1235 个托槽(陶瓷托槽 407 个,塑料托槽 432 个,金属托槽 396 个)。将待处理的牙齿分为六个区段。在去除每个托槽时,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量疼痛程度。在直喙型去釉镊的手柄上再放置一个握力器;使用夹在手柄上的微型测力传感器测量去釉过程中的去除力。对 VAS 和力值进行统计学分析。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,随后进行多重比较的 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Bonferroni 校正;还进行了多元回归分析。

结果

在上颌和下颌前牙段,力值明显小于其他段(p<0.05)。上颌和下颌前牙段的疼痛程度大于后牙段。在所有段,金属托槽的去除力均大于塑料托槽和陶瓷托槽。在上颌和下颌前牙段,陶瓷托槽引起的疼痛明显大于塑料托槽。在调整疼痛、上颌左侧段、年龄和性别后,去除力与托槽相关。

结论

托槽去除过程中可能会出现疼痛和不适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/e81dc6c6bec2/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/33c18195320c/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/ec585b23573b/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/83c06ec969b2/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/31e4fb5e8466/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/e81dc6c6bec2/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/33c18195320c/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/ec585b23573b/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/83c06ec969b2/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/31e4fb5e8466/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb5a/8315792/e81dc6c6bec2/1678-7765-jaos-29-e20200879-gf05.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain and removal force associated with bracket debonding: a clinical study.托槽脱落时的疼痛和脱落力:一项临床研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Jul 23;29:e20200879. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0879. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.新型可折叠陶瓷托槽脱粘特性的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Nov;112(5):552-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70083-0.
3
Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.两种新型陶瓷托槽设计的脱粘特性比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70307-0.
4
Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.铒激光用于金属和陶瓷托槽脱粘:关于牙髓腔内温度、扫描电子显微镜及能谱分析的体外研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov;36(11):595-600. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4412. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.窄刃钳和宽刃钳在拆除陶瓷托槽时的效果比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Mar;103(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70006-A.
6
Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.在模拟临床环境中,不同脱粘技术对陶瓷托槽脱粘力和失效模式的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):680-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.035.
7
Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets.金属和陶瓷托槽热粘接后人牙髓组织学研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Nov;102(5):410-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81187-4.
8
Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.使用超声器械进行预裂纹制备对陶瓷托槽去除的影响。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Aug;114(8):704-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.不同粘结和脱粘技术对正畸陶瓷托槽脱粘的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Aug;112(2):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70237-3.
10
Experimental traumatic debonding of orthodontic brackets.正畸托槽的实验性创伤性脱粘
Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):131-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0131:ETDOOB>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of cotton roll biting on pain perception during orthodontic bracket debonding using Weingart pliers: A randomized controlled trial.使用温格特钳进行正畸托槽拆除时咬棉卷对疼痛感知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Int Med Res. 2025 Sep;53(9):3000605251370333. doi: 10.1177/03000605251370333. Epub 2025 Sep 2.
2
Orthodontic Ceramic Bracket Removal Using Lasers: A Systematic Review.使用激光去除正畸陶瓷托槽:一项系统评价。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 1;16(4):123. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040123.
3
Influence of orthodontic archwire (nickel-titanium versus copper-nickel-titanium) on pain in adult patients in the aligning phase of treatment with self-ligating brackets (two months of follow-up): a prospective observational pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of text messages and anxiety on pain perception and its impact on orthodontic patients routine.短信和焦虑对疼痛感知的影响及其对正畸患者日常的影响。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):30-37. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.5.030-037.oar.
2
Evaluation of pain intensity in patients treated with aligners and conventional fixed appliances: Randomized clinical trial.评价使用牙套和传统固定矫治器治疗的患者的疼痛强度:随机临床试验。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 May;24(2):268-276. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12431. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Validation and reliability of a prototype orthodontic bracket debonding device equipped with force-sensitive resistor (FSR): a novel method of measuring orthodontic bracket debonding force in vivo.
正畸弓丝(镍钛丝与铜镍钛丝)对使用自锁托槽治疗的成年患者排齐阶段疼痛的影响(随访两个月):一项前瞻性观察性初步研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Feb 25;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00483-z.
4
Does the pain experienced during orthodontic treatment and bracket removal depend on the architecture of the bracket or debonding method?正畸治疗及去除托槽过程中所经历的疼痛是否取决于托槽的结构或去粘结方法?
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Dec 4;47(1). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae073.
5
Effectiveness of high-frequency vibration, cotton rolls and elastomeric wafers in alleviating debonding pain of orthodontic metal brackets: a randomized clinical trial.高频振动、棉卷和弹性片缓解正畸金属托槽脱落后疼痛的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75725-2.
6
Nociceptor mechanisms underlying pain and bone remodeling via orthodontic forces: toward no pain, big gain.正畸力作用下疼痛与骨重塑的伤害性感受器机制:追求无痛,收获颇丰。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 22;5:1365194. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1365194. eCollection 2024.
7
Deep learning for virtual orthodontic bracket removal: tool establishment and application.深度学习在虚拟正畸托槽去除中的应用:工具建立与应用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 27;28(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05440-1.
8
Effect of Solitaire FR Stent Thrombectomy Combined with the Suction Thrombus on the Clinical Effect and Prognosis of Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion.Solitaire FR支架取栓联合抽吸血栓对急性大脑中动脉闭塞临床疗效及预后的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 30;2022:9227790. doi: 10.1155/2022/9227790. eCollection 2022.
验证和可靠性的原型正畸托槽粘接剂脱落后设备配备了力敏感电阻(FSR ) :一种新的方法来衡量正畸托槽粘接剂脱落的力量在体内。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0277-x.
4
A study of the mechanical properties of as-received and intraorally exposed single-crystal and polycrystalline orthodontic ceramic brackets.接收时和口腔内暴露的单晶和多晶正畸陶瓷托槽的机械性能研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jan 27;42(1):72-77. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz024.
5
Effectiveness of different debonding techniques and adjunctive methods on pain and discomfort perception during debonding fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review.不同去带技术和辅助方法在去带固定正畸矫治器过程中对疼痛和不适感知的效果:系统评价。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Sep 21;41(5):486-494. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz013.
6
Assessment of bond strength studies of the orthodontic bracket-adhesive system: A systematic review.正畸托槽-黏结剂系统黏结强度研究的评估:一项系统评价
Eur J Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):602-609. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_22_18.
7
Comparative assessment of chewing gum and ibuprofen in the management of orthodontic pain with fixed appliances: A pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial.口香糖与布洛芬用于固定矫治器正畸疼痛管理的比较评估:一项实用多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Aug;150(2):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.02.018.
8
Efficacy of different methods to reduce pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets.不同方法在正畸托槽去除过程中减轻疼痛的效果
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):917-924. doi: 10.2319/020116-88R.1. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
What is the best method for debonding metallic brackets from the patient's perspective?从患者的角度来看,去除金属托槽的最佳方法是什么?
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0088-7. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
10
Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets.陶瓷和金属托槽粘结与脱粘后的剪切粘结强度及釉质表面比较
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):77-85. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.077-085.oar.