Suppr超能文献

验证和可靠性的原型正畸托槽粘接剂脱落后设备配备了力敏感电阻(FSR ) :一种新的方法来衡量正畸托槽粘接剂脱落的力量在体内。

Validation and reliability of a prototype orthodontic bracket debonding device equipped with force-sensitive resistor (FSR): a novel method of measuring orthodontic bracket debonding force in vivo.

机构信息

Department of Science of Dental Materials, Bangladesh Dental College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Orthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2019 Jul 8;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0277-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To introduce an orthodontic bracket debonding device capable of measuring debonding force clinically by a novel sensor mechanism MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prototype orthodontic debonding device was constructed utilizing a lift-off debonding instrument (LODI) and force-sensitive resistor (FSR). For data interpretation, the force sensor was equipped with a microcontroller and C++ programming software running on a computer. Ninety-nine (99) 0.022-in. conventional metallic brackets were bonded to premolar teeth in vitro by a single clinician applying the same adhesive and bonding technique. For validation, the mean debonding force measured by the prototype debonding device (n = 30) and the universal testing machine (n = 30) was compared. Both intra- and inter-examiner reliability tests were done by holding and operating the device in a standardized manner. Following debonding by the prototype device, the bracket failure pattern was evaluated (n = 30) by adhesive remnant index (ARI) under the stereomicroscope at × 30 magnification. Statistical analysis included independent samples t test for validation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval for both intra- and inter-examiner reliability.

RESULTS

Mean orthodontic bracket debonding force measured by the prototype device (9.36 ± 1.65 N) and the universal testing machine (10.43 ± 2.71 N) was not significantly different (p < 0.05). The prototype device exhibited excellent intra- [ICC (3, 1) = 0.942] and inter-examiner reliability [ICC (2, 1) = 0.921] and was able to debond brackets mostly at the bracket-adhesive interface.

LIMITATION

Due to adjusting the position and mechanism of the force sensor, the device had to be held in a modified standardized position.

CONCLUSION

A novel method of measuring in vivo orthodontic bracket debonding force has been introduced which proved to be validated, reliable, and safe in terms of enamel damage.

摘要

背景

介绍一种通过新型传感器机制在临床上测量脱粘力的正畸托槽脱粘装置。

材料与方法

利用脱粘仪(LODI)和力敏电阻(FSR)构建了正畸脱粘装置的原型。为了数据解释,力传感器配备了一个微控制器和在计算机上运行的 C++编程软件。由同一位临床医生使用相同的胶粘剂和粘接技术将 99 个 0.022 英寸的传统金属托槽粘接到离体的前磨牙上。为了进行验证,通过原型脱粘装置(n=30)和万能试验机(n=30)测量的平均脱粘力进行比较。以标准化的方式握持和操作装置进行了内和间检验员可靠性测试。通过原型装置进行脱粘后,通过立体显微镜在 ×30 放大倍数下评估(n=30)根据粘固剂残留指数(ARI)的托槽失效模式。统计分析包括用于验证的独立样本 t 检验和具有 95%置信区间的内类相关系数(ICC),用于内和间检验员可靠性。

结果

原型装置测量的正畸托槽平均脱粘力(9.36±1.65 N)和万能试验机(10.43±2.71 N)没有显著差异(p<0.05)。原型装置具有出色的内[ICC(3,1)=0.942]和间检验员可靠性[ICC(2,1)=0.921],并且能够主要在托槽-粘固剂界面处脱粘托槽。

局限性

由于调整了力传感器的位置和机制,因此必须以修改后的标准化位置握持该装置。

结论

介绍了一种测量体内正畸托槽脱粘力的新方法,该方法在釉质损伤方面已被证明是经过验证、可靠且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58b1/6612523/c2dc9fe5df7f/40510_2019_277_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

3
Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Nov;112(5):552-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70083-0.
4
Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):82-88. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.082-088.oar.
5
Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Jul;116(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70307-0.
6
The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Aug;112(2):132-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70237-3.
8
Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov;36(11):595-600. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4412. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Pain and removal force associated with bracket debonding: a clinical study.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2021 Jul 23;29:e20200879. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0879. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Feb;22(1):82-88. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.1.082-088.oar.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
What is the best method for debonding metallic brackets from the patient's perspective?
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0088-7. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Shear bond strength of precoated orthodontic brackets: an in vivo study.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2010 Jun 15;2:41-5. Print 2010.
7
Effect of simulated debracketing on enamel damage.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Oct;111(10):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.027.
9
The effects of application time of a self-etching primer and debonding methods on bracket bond strength.
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):131-6. doi: 10.2319/020411-82.1. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验