• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作人员对大规模伤亡事件应急准备的看法。

Staff Perspectives of Mass Casualty Incident Preparedness.

作者信息

Moran Mary E, Zimmerman Jacob R, Chapman Amelia D, Ballas Derek A, Blecker Nathan, George Richard L

机构信息

Research, Sponsored Programs, and Innovation, Summa Health, Akron, USA.

Surgery, Division of Trauma, Summa Health, Akron, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jun 23;13(6):e15858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15858. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.15858
PMID:34322342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8299895/
Abstract

Introduction Mass casualty incidents (MCI) are low-frequency, high-risk events that disrupt the day-to-day operations of medical centers. Day-to-day protocols are insufficient for effectively managing MCI events, creating a need to develop and test MCI-specific protocols. The aim of this project was to utilize interviews to gain insight into staff experience and perspective on MCIs and their institution's response plans. Methods Staff members who participated in an MCI drill were asked semi-structured interview questions regarding their perspectives on their current priorities, the information needed to perform their role, and their greatest concerns about an MCI. This quality improvement (QI) project utilized a qualitative methodology to thematically organize the results of the staff responses. Results A total of 64 staff members with various levels of patient care experience were interviewed to reach thematic saturation. The use of staff interviews helped to identify the four primary themes that emerged, which were: 1) process, 2) supplies and resources, 3) communication, and 4) roles. Furthermore, each theme also included a number of subthemes. Conclusions This project demonstrated the importance of staff experiences related to MCI simulation training and preparedness, which may be useful for future training and emergency response planning. Additionally, the results may be helpful for other institutions when building a robust MCI simulation training program or designing an emergency response plan.

摘要

引言 大规模伤亡事件(MCI)是低频、高风险事件,会扰乱医疗中心的日常运作。日常协议不足以有效管理MCI事件,因此需要制定和测试针对MCI的协议。本项目的目的是通过访谈深入了解工作人员对MCI及其机构应对计划的经验和看法。方法 参与MCI演练的工作人员被问及半结构化访谈问题,内容涉及他们对当前工作重点的看法、履行职责所需的信息以及对MCI的最大担忧。这个质量改进(QI)项目采用定性方法对工作人员的回答结果进行主题组织。结果 共采访了64名具有不同患者护理经验水平的工作人员,以达到主题饱和。通过工作人员访谈,确定了出现的四个主要主题,分别是:1)流程,2)物资和资源,3)沟通,4)角色。此外,每个主题还包括若干子主题。结论 本项目证明了工作人员与MCI模拟培训及准备相关经验的重要性,这可能对未来的培训和应急响应规划有用。此外,这些结果在构建强大的MCI模拟培训计划或设计应急响应计划时,可能对其他机构有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d02/8299895/d91170ef2f63/cureus-0013-00000015858-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d02/8299895/d91170ef2f63/cureus-0013-00000015858-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d02/8299895/d91170ef2f63/cureus-0013-00000015858-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Staff Perspectives of Mass Casualty Incident Preparedness.工作人员对大规模伤亡事件应急准备的看法。
Cureus. 2021 Jun 23;13(6):e15858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15858. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Evolution of a mass casualty drill design team: A program evaluation.大规模伤亡事件演练设计团队的演变:一项方案评估。
J Emerg Manag. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):367-377. doi: 10.5055/jem.0542.
3
Small-Scale High-Fidelity Simulation for Mass Casualty Incident Readiness.针对大规模伤亡事件应急准备的小规模高保真模拟
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 15;6(4):S1-S111. doi: 10.21980/J84S8S. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
5
Management of Mass-Casualty Incidents in Nepal: A Qualitative Case Study of Three District Hospitals in Nepal.尼泊尔大规模伤亡事件的管理:尼泊尔三家地区医院的定性案例研究
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Oct;38(5):606-611. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006209. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Survey of major trauma centre preparedness for mass casualty incidents in Australia, Canada, England and New Zealand.澳大利亚、加拿大、英格兰和新西兰主要创伤中心应对大规模伤亡事件的准备情况调查。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 2;21:100322. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100322. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Hospital preparedness for mass gathering events and mass casualty incidents in Matera, Italy, European Capital of Culture 2019.意大利 2019 年文化之都马泰拉的医院为大型集会活动和大批伤员事件做好准备。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3831-3836. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01775-0. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
Wearable Proximity Sensors for Monitoring a Mass Casualty Incident Exercise: Feasibility Study.用于监测大规模伤亡事件演习的可穿戴式接近传感器:可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 26;21(4):e12251. doi: 10.2196/12251.
9
A Critical Pathway for Mass Casualty Incident Preparedness.大规模突发事件准备的关键路径。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(4):275-280. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000597.
10
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Chemical-Mass Casualty Incident Response Education Module (C-MCIREM): A Pilot Simulation Study With a Before and After Design.评估化学大规模伤亡事件应急教育模块(C-MCIREM)的有效性:一项采用前后设计的试点模拟研究。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 14;13(9):e17980. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17980. eCollection 2021 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of prehospital preparedness for major incidents on a national level, with focus on mass casualty incidents.国家级重大事件院前准备评估,重点关注批量伤员事件。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):945-957. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02386-7. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
2
Disaster day: a simulation-based competition for educating emergency medicine residents and medical students on disaster medicine.灾难日:一场基于模拟的竞赛,用于培训急诊医学住院医师和医学生的灾难医学知识。
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 13;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00520-1.
3
The impact of the three-level collaboration exercise on collaboration and leadership during scenario-based hospital evacuation exercises using flexible surge capacity concept: a mixed method cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Disaster preparedness for charge nurses: A program evaluation.护士长备灾能力:方案评估。
J Emerg Manag. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):39-45. doi: 10.5055/jem.0551.
2
Back to Basics: Mass Casualty Incidents.回归基础:大规模伤亡事件
AORN J. 2019 Jan;109(1):95-103. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12443.
3
Emergency Preparedness and Mass Casualty Considerations for Anesthesiologists.麻醉医生的应急准备与大规模伤亡事件考量
三级协作演练对基于情景的医院疏散演练中运用灵活扩充能力概念时的协作和领导力的影响:一项混合方法的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):862. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09882-x.
4
Smart Glasses: A New Tool for Assessing the Number of Patients in Mass-Casualty Incidents.智能眼镜:评估大规模突发事件中患者人数的新工具。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):480-484. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000929. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
Adv Anesth. 2018 Dec;36(1):39-66. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
What have we learned from the time trend of mass shootings in the U.S.?从美国大规模枪击事件的时间趋势中我们了解到了什么?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0204722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204722. eCollection 2018.
5
The Role of Hospital Medicine in Emergency Preparedness: A Framework for Hospitalist Leadership in Disaster Preparedness, Response, and Recovery.医院医学在应急准备中的作用:灾难准备、应对及恢复中医院医师领导力框架
J Hosp Med. 2018 Sep;13(10):713-718. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3073.
6
Strategies for Improved Hospital Response to Mass Casualty Incidents.改善医院应对大规模伤亡事件的策略。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Dec;12(6):778-790. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.4. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
Students' understanding of teamwork and professional roles after interprofessional simulation-a qualitative analysis.跨专业模拟后学生对团队合作和专业角色的理解——一项定性分析
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Apr 8;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0041-6. eCollection 2017.
8
Analysis of performance and stress caused by a simulation of a mass casualty incident.大规模伤亡事件模拟所造成的性能与压力分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.016. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Training Together: Interdisciplinary MCI drill prepares paramedic and nursing students for safe, effective care.共同训练:跨学科的轻度认知障碍演练让护理人员和护理专业学生为安全、有效的护理做好准备。
JEMS. 2017 Mar;42(3):60-3.
10
Treat gun violence like the public health crisis it is.将枪支暴力视为一场公共卫生危机来对待。
J Fam Pract. 2017 Nov;66(11):653.