Fadda Valeria, Bartoli Laura, Ferracane Elisa, Trippoli Sabrina, Messori Andrea
HTA, ESTAR Toscana, Firenze 50132, Italy.
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):228-230. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.228.
A "simplified" figure was proposed in 2011 to summarize the results of controlled trials that evaluate different treatments aimed at the same disease condition. The original criteria for classifying individual binary comparisons included superiority, inferiority and no significance difference; hence, they did not differentiate between no proof of difference proof of no difference. We updated the criteria employed in the original "simplified" figure in order to include this differentiation. A revised version of the simplified figure is proposed and described herein. An example of application is also presented. The example is focused on first-line treatments for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Three treatments (medical therapy, cryoballoon ablation, radiofrequency ablation) are compared with one another through direct and indirect comparisons.
2011年提出了一个“简化”图,以总结评估针对同一疾病状况的不同治疗方法的对照试验结果。对个体二元比较进行分类的原始标准包括优效性、劣效性和无显著性差异;因此,它们没有区分无差异证据和差异不存在的证据。我们更新了原始“简化”图中使用的标准,以纳入这种区分。本文提出并描述了简化图的修订版。还给出了一个应用示例。该示例聚焦于阵发性心房颤动的一线治疗。通过直接和间接比较,对三种治疗方法(药物治疗、冷冻球囊消融、射频消融)进行了相互比较。