Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑障碍的药物治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London UK.

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):768-777. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31793-8. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generalised anxiety disorder is a disease that can be associated with substantial dysfunction. Pharmacological treatment is often the first choice for clinicians because of the cost and resource constraints of psychological alternatives, but there is a paucity of comparative information for the multiple available drug choices.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed on randomised trials in adult outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder identified from MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Drugs@FDA and commercial pharmaceutical registries. Placebo and active control trials were included. Data were extracted from all manuscripts and reports. Primary outcomes were efficacy (mean difference [MD] in change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale Score) and acceptability (study discontinuations for any cause). We estimated summary mean treatment differences and odds ratios using network meta-analyses with random effects. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018087106.

FINDINGS

Studies were published between Jan 1, 1994 and Aug 1, 2017, in which 1992 potential studies were screened for inclusion. This analysis is based on 89 trials, which included 25 441 patients randomly assigned to 22 different active drugs or placebo. Duloxetine (MD -3·13, 95% credible interval [CrI] -4·13 to -2·13), pregabalin (MD -2·79, 95% CrI -3·69 to -1·91), venlafaxine (MD -2·69, 95% CrI -3·50 to -1·89), and escitalopram (MD -2·45, 95% CrI -3·27 to -1·63) were more efficacious than placebo with relatively good acceptability. Mirtazapine, sertraline, fluoxetine, buspirone, and agomelatine were also found to be efficacious and well tolerated but these findings were limited by small sample sizes. Quetiapine (MD -3·60 95% CrI -4·83 to -2·39) had the largest effect on HAM-A but it was poorly tolerated (odds ratio 1·44, 95% CrI 1·16-1·80) when compared with placebo. Likewise, paroxetine and benzodiazepines were effective but also poorly tolerated when compared with placebo. Risk of reporting bias was considered low, and when possible all completed studies were included to avoid publication bias.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the largest contemporary review of pharmacological agents for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder by use of network analysis. There are several effective treatment choices for generalised anxiety disorder across classes of medication. The failure of initial pharmacological therapy might not be a reason to abandon a pharmacological treatment strategy.

FUNDING

No funding was received for this research.

摘要

背景

广泛性焦虑障碍是一种可能导致严重功能障碍的疾病。由于心理替代疗法的成本和资源限制,临床医生通常首先选择药物治疗,但对于多种可用药物选择,比较信息却很少。

方法

对从 MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据、Drugs@FDA 和商业制药登记处中确定的成年门诊广泛性焦虑障碍患者的随机试验进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析。纳入安慰剂和活性对照试验。从所有手稿和报告中提取数据。主要结局是疗效(汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分变化的均值差[MD])和可接受性(任何原因导致的研究中止)。我们使用具有随机效应的网络荟萃分析估计了汇总的平均治疗差异和优势比。这项研究在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42018087106。

发现

研究于 1994 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 8 月 1 日发表,其中筛选了 1992 项潜在研究进行纳入。本分析基于 89 项试验,共纳入 25441 名随机分配至 22 种不同活性药物或安慰剂的患者。度洛西汀(MD-3.13,95%可信区间[CrI] -4.13 至 -2.13)、普瑞巴林(MD-2.79,95% CrI -3.69 至 -1.91)、文拉法辛(MD-2.69,95% CrI -3.50 至 -1.89)和依他普仑(MD-2.45,95% CrI -3.27 至 -1.63)比安慰剂更有效,且具有较好的可接受性。米氮平、舍曲林、氟西汀、丁螺环酮和阿戈美拉汀也被发现有效且耐受良好,但这些发现受到样本量小的限制。喹硫平(MD-3.60,95% CrI -4.83 至 -2.39)对 HAM-A 的影响最大,但与安慰剂相比,其耐受性较差(优势比 1.44,95% CrI 1.16-1.80)。同样,帕罗西汀和苯二氮䓬类药物与安慰剂相比也有效,但耐受性也较差。报告偏倚的风险被认为较低,并且尽可能纳入了所有完成的研究以避免发表偏倚。

解释

据我们所知,这是使用网络分析对治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的药物进行的最大规模的当代综述。在药物治疗中,有多种有效的治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的选择。初始药物治疗失败可能不是放弃药物治疗策略的理由。

结论

无研究资金支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验