Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1868-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02906-1. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Performing a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence of intra-arterial therapies in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients.
A systemic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS for studies regarding intra-arterial therapies in LMBC patients. Full text studies of LMBC patients (n ≥ 10) published between January 2010 and December 2020 were included when at least one outcome among response rate, adverse events or survival was available. Response rates were pooled using generalized linear mixed models. A weighted estimate of the population median overall survival (OS) was obtained under the assumption of exponentially distributed survival times.
A total of 26 studies (1266 patients) were included. Eleven articles reported on transarterial radioembolization (TARE), ten on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and four on chemo-infusion. One retrospective study compared TARE and TACE. Pooled response rates were 49% for TARE (95%CI 32-67%), 34% for TACE (95%CI 22-50%) and 19% for chemo-infusion (95%CI 14-25%). Pooled median survival was 9.2 months (range 6.1-35.4 months) for TARE, 17.8 months (range 4.6-47.0) for TACE and 7.9 months (range 7.0-14.2) for chemo-infusion. No comparison for OS was possible due to missing survival rates at specific time points (1 and 2 year OS) and the large heterogeneity.
Although results have to be interpreted with caution due to the large heterogeneity, the superior response rate of TARE and TACE compared to chemo-infusion suggests first choice of TARE or TACE in chemorefractory LMBC patients. Chemo-infusion could be considered in LMBC patients not suitable for TARE or TACE.
3a.
系统评价和荟萃分析评估经肝动脉治疗在肝转移性乳腺癌(LMBC)患者中的证据。
在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 SCOPUS 中进行系统文献检索,以查找关于 LMBC 患者经肝动脉治疗的研究。纳入至少有一项反应率、不良事件或生存结果的 LMBC 患者(n≥10)的全文研究,且这些研究发表于 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月之间。使用广义线性混合模型对反应率进行汇总。在假设生存时间呈指数分布的情况下,获得人群中位总生存(OS)的加权估计值。
共纳入 26 项研究(1266 例患者)。11 项研究报告了经肝动脉放射栓塞术(TARE),10 项研究报告了经肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE),4 项研究报告了化疗输注。一项回顾性研究比较了 TARE 和 TACE。TARE 的汇总反应率为 49%(95%CI 32-67%),TACE 为 34%(95%CI 22-50%),化疗输注为 19%(95%CI 14-25%)。TARE 的中位生存时间为 9.2 个月(范围 6.1-35.4 个月),TACE 为 17.8 个月(范围 4.6-47.0 个月),化疗输注为 7.9 个月(范围 7.0-14.2 个月)。由于特定时间点(1 年和 2 年 OS)的生存率缺失和高度异质性,无法进行 OS 比较。
尽管由于高度异质性,结果必须谨慎解释,但 TARE 和 TACE 的反应率优于化疗输注,提示在化疗耐药的 LMBC 患者中首选 TARE 或 TACE。对于不适合 TARE 或 TACE 的 LMBC 患者,可以考虑化疗输注。
3a。