• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

容积研究揭示了贝伐珠单抗联合放化疗治疗不可切除胶质母细胞瘤期间,疗效与早期放射学反应之间的关系。

Volumetric study reveals the relationship between outcome and early radiographic response during bevacizumab-containing chemoradiotherapy for unresectable glioblastoma.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2021 Sep;154(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03812-9. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-021-03812-9
PMID:34322829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8437873/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although we have shown the clinical benefit of bevacizumab (BEV) in the treatment of unresectable newly diagnosed glioblastomas (nd-GBM), the relationship between early radiographic response and survival outcome remains unclear. We performed a volumetric study of early radiographic responses in nd-GBM treated with BEV.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with unresectable nd-GBM treated with BEV during concurrent temozolomide radiotherapy were analyzed. An experienced neuroradiologist interpreted early responses on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (GdT1WI). Volumetric changes were evaluated using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and GdT1WI according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The results were categorized into improved (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) or non-improved (stable disease [SD] or progressive disease [PD]) groups; outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The volumetric GdT1WI improvement was a significant predictive factor for overall survival (OS) prolongation (p = 0.0093, median OS: 24.7 vs. 13.6 months); however, FLAIR and DWI images were not predictive. The threshold for the neuroradiologist's interpretation of improvement in GdT1WI was nearly 20% of volume reduction, which was lesser than 50%, the definition of PR applied in the RANO criteria. However, even less stringent neuroradiologist interpretation could successfully predict OS prolongation (improved vs. non-improved: p = 0.0067, median OS: 17.6 vs. 8.3 months). Significant impact of OS on the early response in volumetric GdT1WI was observed within the cut-off range of 20-50% (20%, p = 0.0315; 30%, p = 0.087; 40%, p = 0.0456).

CONCLUSIONS

Early response during BEV-containing chemoradiation can be a predictive indicator of patient outcome in unresectable nd-GBM.

摘要

目的

虽然我们已经证明贝伐单抗(BEV)在治疗不可切除的新诊断胶质母细胞瘤(nd-GBM)中的临床益处,但早期影像学反应与生存结果之间的关系仍不清楚。我们对接受 BEV 治疗的 nd-GBM 的早期影像学反应进行了容积研究。

方法

对 22 例接受 BEV 联合替莫唑胺放疗的不可切除 nd-GBM 患者进行分析。一名有经验的神经放射科医生根据神经肿瘤学反应评估标准(RANO)在液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)和钆增强 T1 加权成像(GdT1WI)上解释早期反应。根据 RANO 标准,使用扩散加权成像(DWI)和 GdT1WI 评估容积变化。将结果分为改善(完全缓解[CR]或部分缓解[PR])或未改善(稳定疾病[SD]或进展性疾病[PD])组;使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较结果。

结果

GdT1WI 容积改善是总生存期(OS)延长的显著预测因素(p=0.0093,中位 OS:24.7 与 13.6 个月);然而,FLAIR 和 DWI 图像没有预测价值。神经放射科医生解释 GdT1WI 改善的阈值接近体积减少的 20%,小于 RANO 标准中 PR 的定义的 50%。然而,即使是不严格的神经放射科医生解释也可以成功预测 OS 延长(改善与未改善:p=0.0067,中位 OS:17.6 与 8.3 个月)。在 20%-50%的截止范围内观察到 OS 对 GdT1WI 早期反应的显著影响(20%,p=0.0315;30%,p=0.087;40%,p=0.0456)。

结论

BEV 联合放化疗期间的早期反应可以成为不可切除 nd-GBM 患者预后的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/c1ef57e8923c/11060_2021_3812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/e39be6a0ec6c/11060_2021_3812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/a2f22acbd2c5/11060_2021_3812_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/259c6eb310fe/11060_2021_3812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/c1ef57e8923c/11060_2021_3812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/e39be6a0ec6c/11060_2021_3812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/a2f22acbd2c5/11060_2021_3812_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/259c6eb310fe/11060_2021_3812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d32/8437873/c1ef57e8923c/11060_2021_3812_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Volumetric study reveals the relationship between outcome and early radiographic response during bevacizumab-containing chemoradiotherapy for unresectable glioblastoma.容积研究揭示了贝伐珠单抗联合放化疗治疗不可切除胶质母细胞瘤期间,疗效与早期放射学反应之间的关系。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Sep;154(2):187-196. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03812-9. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab-a report from the BELOB trial.贝伐单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的二维(RANO)与容积评估方法比较——BELOB试验报告
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):853-861. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now311.
3
Survival benefits of hypofractionated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide or temozolomide plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with glioblastoma aged ≥ 75 years.对于年龄≥75 岁的老年胶质母细胞瘤患者,低分割放疗联合替莫唑胺或替莫唑胺联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的生存获益。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov 12;14(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1389-7.
4
Relative cerebral blood volume is a potential predictive imaging biomarker of bevacizumab efficacy in recurrent glioblastoma.相对脑血容量是复发性胶质母细胞瘤中贝伐单抗疗效的一种潜在预测性影像生物标志物。
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Aug;17(8):1139-47. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov028. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
5
Early post-bevacizumab progression on contrast-enhanced MRI as a prognostic marker for overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma: results from the ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625 Central Reader Study.贝伐珠单抗治疗后早期增强 MRI 进展作为复发性胶质母细胞瘤总生存期的预后标志物:来自 ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625 中心读片研究的结果。
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Jul;15(7):945-54. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not049. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide.贝伐珠单抗联合替莫唑胺一线治疗胶质母细胞瘤可改善患者生存。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Feb;146(3):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03339-0. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
Dexamethasone administration during definitive radiation and temozolomide renders a poor prognosis in a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.在一项针对新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者的回顾性分析中,在确定性放疗和替莫唑胺治疗期间给予地塞米松预后较差。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Oct 31;10:222. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0527-0.
8
The prognostic improvement of add-on bevacizumab for progressive disease during concomitant temozolomide and radiation therapy in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.贝伐珠单抗联合同期替莫唑胺放疗治疗胶质母细胞瘤和间变星形细胞瘤患者进展期疾病的预后改善。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Dec;64(6):502-508. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04463-6. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Survival benefit of glioblastoma patients after FDA approval of temozolomide concomitant with radiation and bevacizumab: A population-based study.美国食品药品监督管理局批准替莫唑胺联合放疗和贝伐单抗后胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存获益:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44015-44031. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17054.
10
Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and irinotecan versus bevacizumab and temozolomide followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: A randomized phase II study.新辅助贝伐单抗联合伊立替康与贝伐单抗联合替莫唑胺序贯同步放化疗治疗新诊断多形性胶质母细胞瘤:一项随机II期研究。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):939-44. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.879607. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Depth of Radiographic Response as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Hepatectomy following Targeted Therapy plus Immunotherapy.影像学反应深度作为初始不可切除肝细胞癌患者在接受靶向治疗加免疫治疗后行肝切除术的独立预后因素
Liver Cancer. 2024 Sep 12;14(2):142-157. doi: 10.1159/000541300. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Response to correspondence on an exploratory prospective phase II study of preoperative neoadjuvant bevacizumab and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.对关于术前新辅助使用贝伐单抗和替莫唑胺治疗新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的探索性前瞻性II期研究的信件回复
J Neurooncol. 2024 Nov;170(2):465-466. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04806-z. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma).日本胶质母细胞瘤治疗的当前趋势:一项使用诊断程序组合数据库的全国性调查(J-ASPECT研究 - 胶质母细胞瘤)
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;26(8):1441-1449. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01929-5. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
Clinical significance of CDKN2A homozygous deletion in combination with methylated MGMT status for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.CDKN2A 纯合缺失联合甲基化 MGMT 状态对 IDH 野生型胶质母细胞瘤的临床意义。
Cancer Med. 2021 May;10(10):3177-3187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3860. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
3
An exploratory prospective phase II study of preoperative neoadjuvant bevacizumab and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
新诊断胶质母细胞瘤术前新辅助贝伐珠单抗和替莫唑胺的探索性前瞻性 II 期研究。
J Neurooncol. 2024 Feb;166(3):557-567. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04544-8. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
4
Evolution and implementation of radiographic response criteria in neuro-oncology.神经肿瘤学中影像学反应标准的演变与实施
Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Sep 13;5(1):vdad118. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad118. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Supramaximal Resection Can Prolong the Survival of Patients with Cortical Glioblastoma: A Volumetric Study.超最大切除范围可延长皮质胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存时间:一项体积研究。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Aug 15;63(8):364-374. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0351. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Impact of Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab on Neuroradiographic Response and Histological Findings Related to Tumor Stemness and the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment in Glioblastoma: Paired Comparison Between Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastomas.新辅助贝伐单抗对胶质母细胞瘤神经影像学反应及与肿瘤干性和缺氧肿瘤微环境相关的组织学结果的影响:新诊断和复发性胶质母细胞瘤的配对比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 17;12:898614. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898614. eCollection 2022.
7
Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.术中磁共振成像在脑胶质瘤切除术中的应用。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Mar 1;21(1):148-167. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0116. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
8
Imposing Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trials of Targeted Drugs for Glioblastoma: Current Status and Progress.胶质母细胞瘤靶向药物的II期和III期临床试验:现状与进展
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:719623. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.719623. eCollection 2021.
Response assessment during chemoradiation using a hypercellular/hyperperfused imaging phenotype predicts survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
采用高细胞/高灌注成像表型在放化疗期间进行反应评估可预测新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):1537-1546. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab038.
4
Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤的化疗方法及贝伐单抗使用管理的最新进展
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;13(12):470. doi: 10.3390/ph13120470.
5
Value of dynamic contrast perfusion MRI to predict early response to bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from ACRIN 6686 multicenter trial.动态对比灌注 MRI 预测新诊断胶质母细胞瘤贝伐珠单抗早期应答的价值:ACRIN 6686 多中心试验结果。
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;23(2):314-323. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa167.
6
First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide.贝伐珠单抗联合替莫唑胺一线治疗胶质母细胞瘤可改善患者生存。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Feb;146(3):451-458. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03339-0. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
7
The prognostic improvement of add-on bevacizumab for progressive disease during concomitant temozolomide and radiation therapy in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.贝伐珠单抗联合同期替莫唑胺放疗治疗胶质母细胞瘤和间变星形细胞瘤患者进展期疾病的预后改善。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2020 Dec;64(6):502-508. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04463-6. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
Advantages and Disadvantages of Combined Chemotherapy with Carmustine Wafer and Bevacizumab in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Single-Institutional Experience.卡莫司汀植入剂联合贝伐珠单抗治疗新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的优缺点:单机构经验。
World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e508-e514. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.070. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy-an exploratory analysis of AVAglio.治疗下胶质母细胞瘤的放射学进展——AVAglio 的探索性分析。
Neuro Oncol. 2018 Mar 27;20(4):557-566. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox162.
10
Prevalence and clinicopathological features of H3.3 G34-mutant high-grade gliomas: a retrospective study of 411 consecutive glioma cases in a single institution.H3.3 G34突变型高级别胶质瘤的患病率及临床病理特征:对一家机构连续411例胶质瘤病例的回顾性研究
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2017 Jul;34(3):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s10014-017-0287-7. Epub 2017 Apr 26.