University of Georgia.
Purdue University.
Personal Disord. 2021 Jul;12(4):300-311. doi: 10.1037/per0000416. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Despite the advances in our understanding of the structure of personality and psychopathology (see Kotov et al., 2017), less attention has been paid to empirically examining their underlying facet structure. To gain a more nuanced understanding of the structure of personality, it is important to identify empirically derived lower order structures of these trait domains; thus, the present study sought to examine the structure of antagonism as represented by items from commonly used measures of pathological personality traits. Participants were recruited from a large, southeastern university ( = 532) and completed 234 antagonism items selected from seven measures of pathological personality traits. Criterion variables measuring interpersonal adjectives, aggression, substance use, depression, and anxiety were also collected. A series of factor analyses were conducted to examine the structure of antagonism at a range of specificities. A seven-factor solution emerged as being both comprehensive and reasonably parsimonious with factors labeled Callousness, Grandiosity, Domineering, Manipulation, Suspiciousness, Aggression, and Risk Taking. The present findings demonstrate how trait Antagonism unfolds at varying levels of specificity as well as how the emergent factors differentially relate to outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管我们对人格和精神病理学结构的理解有了进步（参见 Kotov 等人，2017），但对其实证检验其潜在的层面结构的关注较少。为了更细致地了解人格结构，重要的是要识别这些特质领域的实证得出的较低阶结构；因此，本研究旨在检验以常见的病理性人格特质测量项目来表示的敌意的结构。参与者从一所位于东南部的大型大学中招募（=532），并完成了 234 个来自七种病理性人格特质测量的敌意项目。还收集了衡量人际关系形容词、攻击性、物质使用、抑郁和焦虑的标准变量。进行了一系列因素分析，以在不同的特定性水平上检验敌意的结构。一个七因素的解决方案被证明是全面的，并且具有相当的简约性，这些因素被标记为无情、自大、专横、操纵、多疑、攻击性和冒险性。本研究结果表明了特质敌意如何在不同的特异性水平上展开，以及新出现的因素如何与结果不同相关。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。
